Thread replies: 12
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4
Anonymous
Funfair now on Novaexchange 2017-07-27 07:03:05 Post No. 2888150
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Funfair now on Novaexchange 2017-07-27 07:03:05 Post No. 2888150
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: funfair_logo-1.jpg?fit=2560%2C1789.jpg (392KB, 2560x1789px) Image search:
[Google]
392KB, 2560x1789px
https://novaexchange.com/market/BTC_FUN/
There's no volume yet, but as the western side of the world wakes up it'll be noticed. Wouldn't hurt to buy on Bittrex for around 400-500 sats, move it to Nova and set higher sells on Nova just in case there's a dumb buyer who buys at the higher price. After all its value still hasn't adjusted there. If it adjusts anyway keep holding until September when a good chunk of the leftover supply is burned after the next token sale happening then.
>>
>>2888150
I wouldn't buy. They're doing a second ICO and it kinda looks bad from what they've shown.
>>
>>2888183
>second ICO
fuck sake are we having fun yet?
>>
I wanna invest in a gambling ICO but gonna hold out for betking
this logo looks like some fucking county fair shit where they scam the fuck out of you.
I don't trust it.
>>
>>2888233
>county fair
H-haha
http://breaking911.com/ride-malfunctions-ohio-state-fair-leaving-least-1-dead/
But I'm holding for the long term. Just look at what happened to Etheroll a few months after its ICO, despite having the problems of taking forever, needless transaction costs for each roll, etc. And these problems are all solved thanks to Funfair's state channels, I'm confident in its value many months from now, only time will tell.
>>
Dao.casino
>>
File: ECigPic.png (364KB, 499x395px) Image search:
[Google]
364KB, 499x395px
fun never ends, mang
>>
>>2888183
>second ICO
The fuck? The entire selling point to the first ICO was that there would never be any additional FUN generated so the value would only go up unless the entire platform collapsed.
I was already suspicious when they exceeded their "hardcap" on FUN production during the ICO by like a billion coins, but now it's getting pretty damn obvious that the devs are just looking to trade shit tokens for cash.
>>
>>2888330
>The entire selling point to the first ICO was that there would never be any additional FUN generated
oh but there's always more FUN to be had, friend
>>
F̛͟͟ ̧̡Ų͡ N̛
>>
Seriously though, at this point I'm pretty sure that anything that isn't a PoW no-premine crypto is outright trash.
ICO? Trash.
ETH token? Trash.
PoS? Trash.
>>
File: 2017-07-26 16.31.41.jpg (169KB, 1756x800px) Image search:
[Google]
169KB, 1756x800px
>>2888354
sounds like you need some SIGT
Thread posts: 12
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4