The Bitcoin-Classic

The Bitcoin-Classic thread.
As soon as the SEGWIT is activated, I will make a hard fork, as it is said here:
Https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2018878
After this Bitcoin Core clients earlier version 0.14.1 will start rejecting new blocks.
The difficulty will fall and it will be possible to mine Bitcoin classic even if there is no mining of pools.
In the Bitcoin console, the command "setgenerate true".
Install Bitcoin-Core of 2017 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/releases/tag/v0.9.1 and save your Bitcoin-Classic from thieves.

>Becouse it more undestandable.
>Segwit it fail try to prevent BITCOIN CLASSIC existince.

Stop posting, please

>>2865631
>Buy one get one free !!
>Comic Sans font

Oh god.

Why can't you even post a link properly, sysbrah?

THE BITCOIN-CLASSIC THREAD.
AS SOON AS THE SEGWIT IS ACTIVATED, I WILL MAKE A HARD FORK, AS IT IS SAID HERE:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2018878
AFTER THIS BITCOIN CORE CLIENTS EARLIER VERSION 0.14.1 WILL START REJECTING NEW BLOCKS.
THE DIFFICULTY WILL FALL AND IT WILL BE POSSIBLE TO MINE BITCOIN CLASSIC EVEN IF THERE IS NO MINING OF POOLS.
IN THE BITCOIN CONSOLE, THE COMMAND "setgenerate true".
INSTALL BITCOIN-CORE OF 2017 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/releases/tag/v0.9.1 AND SAVE YOUR BITCOIN-CLASSIC FROM THIEVES.

need wait 15 days for dificulty fall
https://bitcoinwisdom.com/bitcoin/difficulty

>>2865788
>>2865819

If this is the best marketing BCC can do then it's doomed

this tread is wrong!
>>2866721

This shit will be spammed into oblivion unless they change the PoW to make it asic proof.

>>2867235
You're acting like a contentious hard fork with a dev team who disregards Core wasn't already doomed to begin with

>>2867949
it the core but old version
save and well tested