Thoughts?
>>2860397
I can't find it on bittrex, is it an asian coin?
>>2860789
if it wasn't for AMD and Nvidia, you wouldn't have any joke to make
>>2860397
second tier for plebs (like me)
gpus sucks for mining any coin that use sgminer. huge minus. power consumption is much worse than nvidia analogs.
but cpus are getting better. 1600 without x (apart from its lack of overclocking pass 4ghz) is so good that intel will release i5 6 cores next time (rumors).
they are planning to get in server market with their behemoth cpu's...... good luck with that. many companies will probably continue to buy intel ones cause long term "connections".
>>2860397
Intels new stuff is about to make them irrelevant
Always amazes me people hate amd at 2 love it at 14 every time
Short to 0
>>2860828
>Muh secret Intel plan to stop gAyMD!
>>2860397
Constantly manipulated by Jewman Sachs.
Stay away.
>>2860397
Incompetent software team
Incompetent hardware team
They are riding on node shrinks for their performance gains. Performance gains from here on out will rely solely on trading off power consumption.
Ryzen has a 3.9ghz wall.
Vega isn't any better than Fiji.
Buy something like Tesla instead. Innovative, environmental, technological, safe, guaranteed 2x gains.
Intel is probably stuck as well but they have 20x the budget of AMD and can throw money at problems until it's solved.
>>2860397
I'm selling half of my shares, if they rise to at least 14.5$ before ER. AMD is going to be win/win stock to me anyway.
AMD fails; 9$ share that will rise to 14$ again.
AMD wins; 16-18$ then 20$+ after Q3.
AMD does average: 12-13$
>>2860828
I cant even count the number of times this has been said since the 486 days.
>>2860397
I keep hearing online that it's overvalued by 30%
>>2861726
Intel uses 14nm+ but their KabyLake performance per watt is piss poor.
Node shrinks alone are not why Ryzen is power efficient. Every pipeline is optimised to prevent power leaks - 4GHz is the optimal balance between IPC gains/Performance Per Watt/CCX scalability.
AMD has created an architecture that even in its behemoth 32 core dies can effectively clock to 4Ghz per core. The jump from Bulldozer to something this power efficient is beyond impressive.
The R7 1700 in a 65W envelope makes the i7 5960X look silly, and that thing sold for $1000.
AMD for me is a long term buy - its very clear their silicon architects are better than you'd suggest.