Why are you not buying BAT?

>>2810154
Brendan, is that you?

>>2810154
To be honest, I don't believe in its idea anymore. We'll see how it goes, of course, but the whole concept of "we're here to protect users from online ads by.. other ads!" seems not very clever to me. Why? Because normies don't mind ads in the first place. By the way, I'm kinda into online marketing myself.

Maybe their browser will gain some traction and, in its turn, the token, but I don't really know

I had heard whale bought huge chunks of it when it first started. Like the anon said, idea is really great but it might just be theory.

Why are you buying it OP?

>>2810154
I'm thinking of buying this moon coin

Just bought 100,000k

nice! sign me up for 100k

>>2810154
I have $300 in BAT, which is 1/6th or so of my portfolio.

It's irrational to say it won't take over or be bought out by a bigger company as it literally just improves on google chrome and makes it much faster and safe straight away.
There's no reason for it not to boom. It's still not a top pick of mine, Iota and Bitquence are absolutely hands down the best techs in the cryptospace right now.
They, without a doubt, unless they're all round up and shot, will increase by 100x+ in the coming years.

BATs weird
A+ team with a clear roadmap yet it constantly gets shit on and dumped.

>>2811434
Because a complicated ad token attached to a niche browser is no replacement to Google AdWords and Chrome.

Use your head.