sup bizbros, some of you guys are pretty chill.
me and my team are about to launch our pre-ico. I'm not going to divulge too much information about it here until we talk to our attorney, but just before we finalize everything, is there anything specific you guys would like to see in our whitepaper or website? 8^)
>>2796284
>you guys would like to see in our whitepaper or website?
Hot chicks wrestling
>>2796284
trips decides something that gets placed in our whitepaper or website and a small bounty of our coin. Also, we have a pretty serious team (devs are from companies like facebook), so this should turn on decently ok.
>>2796301
Gas the kikes race war now
why i should invest in your product
>>2796326
Are you asking me why you should invest in my product, or saying that should be included in our whitepaper?
I'm not currently selling my product on /biz, I'll leave that to our marketing team when we're ready to go public. Regarding our white paper, we already have that shit in there! haha
>>2796301
sad wojakz
how about an explanation of why a competing service that strips out any unnecessary token integration won't be able to be more efficient and liquid than your version tied to a token because if it wasnt you wouldn't get any funding.
>>2796434
kek, got that covered. unlike other shitcoins, our project is revenue based; devs make money if the project makes money, and coin holders are basically share holders and will get dividends monthly.
It's basically a share that doesn't need to be registered as a security because it's a cryptocurrency which is technically private property according to the IRS
>>2796434
and honestly I don't even understand why people invest in tokens that aren't revenue based / profit driven hahahahaha