I chose my hedge

>>2789570
Good choice, ICN is my biggest holding. I will be holding it for a good few years. I don't give a flying fuck about this dip, I'm actually super happy if everything stays low for a few months the weak handed cucks will sell stuff at a loss and us long term investors can stock up for the long term, ready for the next bull run.

>>2789761
Dumbass

>>2789775

Is you

>>2789775
We'll see who's the dumbass in 2 years time. Screenshot this and I'll post an update this time next year.

>>2789570
>Remember that ICN, MLN, LKK, etc. are company stocks.

they are not. it's what they want you to think, but they simply are not. you have voting rights with stocks, because a stock represents ownership. with icn for instance the only ownership you get is 'ownership of the web app', but without real voting rights. read their fucking white papers, anon. they are (half-)scams.

ICN said in their AMA's ICN token holders will have holding rights.

>>2790712
Not every stock holds a voting right, snap for example

>>2790744
that's true, but all of them entitle you to a claim to a part of the companies assets and earnings.
while iconomy does the latter in terms of a buy back (which they sure enough not decide for because it's easier to distribute that way, like they claimed when they broke their own ICO-promises), you have no claim to any company assets - or even the company funds which consist of profits and ico money in case the company gets liquidated for any reason.

*voting rights

>>2790743
they don't get to vote on whether to pay out dividends or do a buy back. that they explicitly said. what let's you believe that you get a vote in any major decision or even elect board members? they'll let you decide on colours and names like it was some pepsi promo campaign.

The only thing holding me back from this coin is the 3% management fee they are going to be charging for the ICNX token. I think that is too high of a rate to attract whale investors. Why not just create your own diverse portfolio?