Segwit or core?

this >>2785819

why don't they leave BTC as it is? If people crave for new specs and miners want to decide the future then they should associate and create another crypto not fucking trying to destroy the most valued one.

Reee

There is literally no reason to mod BTC

neither, they all need to burn.

>>2789533
There is a massive massive reason. Tx speed. You do realise major organizations operate on bitcoin right? Especially the trillion dollar illegal ones that operate through the dark web such as porn and drugs. Normal corporations also start adapting it. As it stands now compared to bank fiat transfer you can wait days for BTC to transfer unless you pay much higher fees for miners to take notice. Do you know how troublesome that waiting period is in the biz world? BTC needed an upgrade for the long term. If you actually want it to some day reach 5k, 10k, 20k and possibly 1mil it needs to keep on being improved.

>>2789533
Newfag detected

>>2789518
can't even read the words he's trying to type

>>2789569
So what you are basically saying is that the commodity characteristic of BTC is useless for you? If you want a more fiat like crypto and everyone wants a @lighter and @faster blockchain move the mark cap to one with those specs.

BTC isn't suppose to be traded on low amounts or trade within seconds.

Do you buy in gold?

You idiots are the reason why at the end we will have BTC 1, BTC 2, BTC 3. The only reason to mod a crypto is if fails, and so far its secure as fuck. I dont care if it takes a week to confirm, its the beauty of it. You stupid morons who have to idea of economy are willing to kill the best one and shill the JPMorgan one (ETH) so they can make cycles and take all your money by whaling.