golem mclonghodlers represent

holding mine til $100

File: golem.jpg (103KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 960x720px

>>2701282
rollin

>>2701282
in from 8 cents my nigglet

File: Star_of_David.svg.png (48KB, 1200x1385px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 1200x1385px

>>2701287
>The word golem occurs once in the Bible in Psalm 139:16, which uses the word גלמי (galmi; my golem),that means "my light form", "raw" material,connoting the unfinished human being before God's eyes.The Mishnah uses the term for an uncultivated person: "Seven characteristics are in an uncultivated person, and seven in a learned one," (שבעה דברים בגולם) (Pirkei Avot 5:6 in the Hebrew text; English translations vary). In Modern Hebrew, golem is used to mean "dumb" or "helpless". Similarly, it is often used today as a metaphor for a brainless lunk or entity who serves a man under controlled conditions but is hostile to him under others."Golem" passed into Yiddish as goylem to mean someone who is clumsy or slow.

>>2701313
nigger you posted this shit yesterday, nigger

>>2701287
You don't know what you are talking about. 100 dollars per coin would make many whales very rich

>>2701282
Yea im waiting to offload these bags too

why would anyone buy golem ?

> On a different note, there is a reason too. Decentralized computing power or decentralized storage just isn't a viable economic product. Because it is decentralized, you would never be able to get a product as reliable as what you would get from Amazon or Dropbox. Amazon and Dropbox already have some levels of redundancy and protection, and for a decentralized network to have the same level of reliability, it would have to have A LOT more redundancy than the centralized players. So a user will either end up paying the same amount for an inferior product with decentralization or pay a lot more for a product that is just as stable. AirBnB and Uber were able to tackle an industry with some gaps in their model. But distributed computing power and distributed storage is already been optimized for maximum efficiency in the centralized world. It is going to be really hard to find gaps in Dropbox's or Amazon's model.

> Look at a decentralized model like the blockchain. It is sooooooo terribly inefficient and weak compared to a centralized database solution, but what it offers is an extreme level of security. For storing, money, people will be willing to deal with the decentralized drawbacks for the increased security, but for securing their family videos, or running a model 3D, they don't need high level of security, they want the cheapest, quickest, and easiest option. Amazon and Dropbox know that and have offered a service that is already finely tuned and optimized for that. Both Amazon and Dropbox have free tiers for smaller users, it is going to be hard for Golem or Storj to beat free, easy, and reliable.


Info from - https://forum.nem.io/t/catapult-questions-big-picture/3886

>>2702756
gotta think long term

gonna wait till then wall get pulled