>>2537560
absolutely.
theyre probably not hindered by being "a working man" and thus have more freedom to do things that are considered girly.
i remember seeing a rich kid documentary and some kid got into fashion design and made millions off of it. he came from a family of mechanics.
i remember a thread about some brother making fun of his other brother sewing up my little pony plushes and the brother showed him how much people were willing to pay for it on ebay. they both began watching the show and paying close attention to it while sewing up dolls.
>>2537560
gay people are generally better at everything than straights. their brains are wired differently, hemispheres more connected. anywhere you go you will see gays near or at the top.
>>2537942
found the gay
>>2537942
Except when I am there, then they are bottoms ;)
>>2537560
I'm gay and have been successful with my cryptos, maybe you're on to something
>>2537942
very true, breeders btfo
>>2538025
Anon is a literal fag, abandon
For men, sex is usually one of the most (if not the most) pleasurable thing. Not so for women, who leverage their position in the sexual economy. Therefore, if you're a gay man, finding another gay man means basically free sex (since you both want it) and lots of free time to spend on non-sexual pursuits. This is also why society oppresses homosexual men, they're too good.
>>2538027
Like what is actually his problem?
>>2537942
This isn't true at all. They do have more freedom tho. Since they never seem to commit to long-term relationships, they have more disposable income, which they burn on retarded luxury items and gay parades around the globe while documenting it all on Instagram. This adds up to the myth that gay men are "successful," when in reality a lot of them are sex-addict, depressed individuals who jump from one partner to another in hopes of finding true love, with little to no care with their bodies, which explains the ridiculously high HIV infection rate among gay men.
This is not to say that gay people can't be intelligent, pic related is a prime example of an intelligent fag, but your post is a biased exaggeration.
>>2537560
jesus fuck. why doesn't anyone ever fucking label anything
who are these people?