Why is the 1060 and 1070 being shilled for mining
>>2383568
because amd cards are non existent out of stock everywhere
>>2383568
Because you can buy a 1070 for much less than a 480 right now and it gets about the same hashrate.
>>2383568
1060 gets about 20mh/s and 1070 gets about 25 without clocking. good luck finding an RX anything
I'm getting about 30-31mh/s with overclocked 1070's on ethminer. They consume the same power as RX 480's as far as I'm aware. Plus they are actually good at mining other things.
nvidia cards aren't all that bad at mining altcoins
Is there any point in mining with a single 1070?
If so, what is best to mind and how ?
>>2383781
AMD wasn't planning on selling 6+ GPUs per customer to everyone in the mining community so there are supply issues.
>>2384443
nicehash is the way to go, 1070 is worth. Almost $4 a day with the 1060 you'll get better results with a 1070
>>2384443
If you leave your computer on anyway you might as well just run nicehash (or run Eth miner in a pool if you wanna put more effort in but not really worth for a single 1070). You'll make about 0.002 BTC per day with nicehash with a single 1070.
I can get my hands on the 1080's for $450...is it worth it?
Anybody know how U.S. taxes work on mined coins?
>>2384529
1080's aren't really much better than 1070's for mining. They're slightly better but also consume more power and cost more. The 1080Ti seems to be the most efficient card (in terms of hashing power per watt), but when you consider initial capital limitations the 1070 comes out on top (only being slightly less efficient than the 1080Ti but you can buy a shit ton more of them for the same $$$).
>>2384443
I've been mining eth for the last 3 weeks with my 1070. Not 100% uptime, more like 85-90%.