Doing your own research

1 sat coins / Coins around 1 sat.

1L3RHfJztcCEB7LZByUW4GXHuqQzVxzgCC

what are yobit coins.

Coins ready for a pump and dump.

>>2370887

I'll give you a clue: If you're thinking of an answer relating to anything after September 2015 you're wrong.

>>2370876
jews.

>>2370903
LOTS OF BAGHOLDERS!!

>>2370876
Coins that mooned in the last bubble, and are mooning now again. Indicating that we are once more in a bubble.


1NN4cmXCp5hAbxBZSUaPo61TjTUSRGwnQN

Shitcoin PnD's

They're all shitcoins

1PJtxw9ote1nFGycaL3BCyZSVoakyxifVx

>>2370920
With the last bubble, I mean right before Mt Gox crash in 2014.

All past their prime

Coins that are has-beens, they used to be worth more than they are right now. Were pumped and dumped during Bubbles

1AK7HNEctA3zzbtiaHUdmciN9t3YiFURUT

They are all 2+ year old coins (most ANN on bitcointalk are 2013-2014). None are based on ETH?

>>2370920
>>2370934
What he said except for now we're not in a bubble.

1L3RHfJztcCEB7LZByUW4GXHuqQzVxzgCC

>>2370876
what are fates that nucoins like ETH XEM and XRP will soon face.

>>2370903

Bush did 9/11

>>2370944

Yes both points to note.

>>2370961
Alright I'll bite once more. They're also all non-turing complete. You can add that to my answer if you think it's relevant. (might be in 10 years)

copypasta coins

>>2370876
Mining was frontloaded, i.e. a lot of the coin's supply was mined shortly after the ICO?

Only thing I can think of. Some of those coins are fucking obscure.

>>2370987
Doge didn't have an ICO. That can't be the answer.

Coins that OP has been holding since last bubble

All decentralised LTC derivatives?
Are you saying something is going to happen to LTC?

>>2370876
these are all supershticoins that no one should ever invest in

Proof of work?

>>2370987

Some specifically didn't.

>>2370995
Ltc is an ltc derivative now? The causal link between all members of a set and the set itself can't be a part of the set. Unless OP is retarded it has to be something else than that.

>>2371011
Pre-mine?

>>2370997

Part of the list is explained by PoW yes.

They are all created and mostly owned by the same group of people

All Bitcoin forks?

>threadtheme

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9D-QD_HIfjA

>>2370876
the first altcoins?

super old stuff i remember from 2013/14

>>2371011
im noticing a bunch are pos which i didnt even know was a thing that long ago. only started getting into crypto a few months ago

>>2371032

Yes

they're all shitcoins

>>2371045
>1L3RHfJztcCEB7LZByUW4GXHuqQzVxzgCC

>>2371054
dont be a faggot.

>>2371045
Wait what. Did I win?

>>2371032
if this was the actual answer I'm gonna kill myself

So, Bitcoin forks, are all old, and bring nothing to the table other than being currencies (nothing like stratis or factom)

>>2371054

>that's not the answer friendo

>>2371060
You can send me some too. Don't be shy.

>1L3RHfJztcCEB7LZByUW4GXHuqQzVxzgCC

File: 1496876027474.png (20KB, 592x477px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 592x477px

Old ass shitcoins? Darkcoin is Dash now though, not that it's not a piece of shit.

>>2371063
Don't do that, anon. It was a fun game.

>>2371062

No sorry :(

They all use the scrypt hashing algorithm

>>2371064

All btc forks

All PoS or PoW

All from before the Mt Gox crash

None of them have risen in value since

Some of them have gimmicks but no real value proposition.


What type of rule would select only these coins from a list of all coins?

>>2371084
>All btc forks - x
>All PoS or PoW
>All from before the Mt Gox crash
>None of them have risen in value since
>Some of them have gimmicks but no real value proposition.

>>2371084
>none of them have risen in value since

Except for the bubble we're in right now.

>>2371081
Not true.

>>2371084
>None of them have risen in value since
Also not true.

>>2371077
Is this the entire list of what fits within the 'theme' or just a part of it?

None of them use SHA-256

>>2371104
>Is this the entire list of what fits within the 'theme' or just a part of it?

It's the entire list there's a specific sentence which gets this list.

They are all coins biz doesn't shill and avoids

gpu mining

All threads about these coins were archived when you made this thread.

>>2371112
The gimmicks part

Segwit

I need to sleep. Someone get it already.

Peercoin was actually the first PoS coin. novacoin was the first to make use of both pos and pow. YAcoin is aderivative of both peercoin and Novacoin.


Is this a list of coins that were built on top of each others' technology?

They've all been hacked

>>2371152

True but that wouldn't get you this list specifically.

All of these coins survived the OG BTC crash?

There is no answer and OP just like messin' with us. :-)

>>2370876
Dont listen /biz/ about those shitcoins

1ayy2DoLj5ZHHyQgJZFuyFqNM5gb6sRB4

Free bump!
Now, make a ''Roll'' here >>2370686

The thing that they have in common is that the only place they're all mentioned together is here: >>2370876

>>2371185
It's a list of coins that all have gimmicks that are non-exclusive to one an another. Do you want to build a coin implementing some or most of these features because you believe that all together they would lead to a superior coin?

>>2371112
Coins from 2012-2014 that introduced some (small, gimmicky parameter) change?

This is just a ruse, right OP? There's not many other common factors than what have been mentioned unless I'm missing something. They weren't on any common exchange from what I remember.

Androids Token is a weird one. Not much on it anywhere.

>>2371223

There is although I'm not sure how obvious it is that's why I'm asking - trying to gauge how /biz/ thinks.

One more hint. Is it tech or something else?

>>2371254
This is how I think. Fuck you.

>>2371254

I'm going to go for a while however I'll see if someone happens across the answer later.

>>2371254
Coins (from 2012-2014) introducing new mining algorithms? Quite sure that doesn't apply to all actually.

>>2371271
op no dont

>>2371268

Me too

>>2370876

they're all forks which lead to more forks than their siblings?

>>2370903
>September 2015
what did he mean by this

the theme they share is PoS (proof of stake)
1NbES9it8RmzWPYKaArYaW3iXbnPnEH2Uk

>>2370876
They have all been timestamped into the bitcoin blockchain through via Ledger. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ledger_(journal)

Thanks OP, that was fun.
1HJ6A1N7QfXxuDdAXymHjWxsMRVcuxr2Bv

I think I'm on the right track. I just need to see the pattern. But I got why the September 2015 clue is crucial, by the way

I don't know what the answer to the question is but I AM autistic enough to recognize ops writing style. I know who you be Mr whale arrr

They were all the 1st to do something significant in the history of crypto.

IE: Nova coin was the 1st PoS combined with scrypt
Litecoin was the First cryptocurrency to use scrypt and a faster block generation rate


1H8pa4vLNwW6fVGKNhzgF97qCc3T4UKUzh

>>2371696
Already said, you just worded it differently.

File: 1495755495787s.jpg (4KB, 250x203px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 250x203px

Ok cash, I find it laughable the fact that nobody talks about it here, almost insigunificantes walls until the 10 thousand satoshis, listed in the bitrex, while I say he just uploaded 100 satoshis, for sure it will be a top volume coin soon, at least for one day

12t2rH6cm3VPW7mQJeg5fzDjjyXh7iZ6dZ

>>2371271
I think I get you. These coins are now worthless. The coins now will be worthless after an imminent crash.

>>2371736
wat

>>2371736
huh

File: 1494610705655.jpg (83KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 800x600px

the coin okcash ,just check in bitrex ,is going to 10k satoshi today >>2371756
>>2371764

just look the sell wal ,is just 1,4 bitcoin for 6k ,i think is going to more than 10k

File: 1490435593751.png (105KB, 362x492px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 362x492px

>>2371799
>>2371811

File: look.png (19KB, 1234x657px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 1234x657px

>>2371826

File: mqdefault.jpg (4KB, 320x180px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 320x180px

>>2371799
I love you /biz/

They all have a MIT license?

Okay. I'm stuck... might as well share what I found. If this helps you win anything, don't hesitate to throw some of your gains my way: 1BJVakRy3dy45EsqWPaBnf53QJMM44JY4A

He's referring to september 2015 because this is the last date present on this website: http://mapofcoins.com/bitcoin.

Here's a rough map of the tree involved:
A) bitcoin > peercoin > novacoin > yacoin > vertcoin > altcoin
> cubits
B) bitcoin > sifcoin > quark > darkcoin > x14
C) bitcoin > tenebrix > litecoin > feathercoin > securecoin
> starcoin > androids tokens > colossus coin
> smartcoin > spots > copperbars
> junkcoin > luckycoin > doge

Here's when each leaf (i.e., the last coin in a branch) has appeared:
x14: july 14
colossus: august 13
copperbar: august 13
securecoin: may 13
doge: december 13
altcoin: february 14
cubits: november 13

I tried using their filter (top left) but I don't get any obvious patterns. Also I'm not sure the data is correct (altcoin is "defunct on arrival).

Good luck /biz/. I'll let you know if I find anything else.

>>2371950
Crap.
it messed up my beautiful tree.
A) cubits starts from novacoin.
C) the sub-branches start from litecoin

They were all on Stasibit

>>2371950
This anon deserves a cookie for sure OP.

>>2371950
Last addendum. I wrote my message in a hurry. I forgot to put apostrophes in front of the numbers. those are years, not days... '13 as in 2013.

To me, I can officially say these look like they were created by the same developer or team.

Same structure: p2p trade, same rare website domains ie:. cc and orgs. Looks like the dev rolled with the winning coins.

18eFq53pUuupfxyeQnRqfg8Yw5dYDgBSCL

Yeah... There's also a search function below the timeline. It's somewhat broken (it stops working and I need to refresh the page to fix it). I tried searching for common keywords and I got no results.

But I have an idea... to highlight the complete path to include every single one of those coins, you just need to find something in common between the leaves (since the parents of said leave will have to be highlighted anyway):
altcoin, cubits, x14, securecoin, colossus, copperbars and doge.

They are all coins that experienced a huge bubble during the summer.

>>2370876
near identical chart activity but i dont know enough about charting to say more

>>2370876
You mined a fuckton of them with your GPU before 2015, because they were all unpopular bitcoin forks with small network hashrates and with the price going sideways, and now you hope some of them moon.
There's your theme

They all use the MIT license

They all will have some form of inflation like 1% a year

Thx
Its inflation right?


:D

>>2370876
all coins created by the same scammer
what do I win

OP, don't leave us hanging. Just reveal it if it hasn't been solved yet.

I think these were all listed on Mintpal, Darkcoin became Dash so at least that one was successful

I'm still waiting for an answer !