DGB VS VTR

Not sure, but VTR is going to have a big pump

VTR is the next Digibyte in terms of pump.

DGB while a good coin has had its day

vtr
dgb will fall

File: Screen Shot 2017-06-05 at 12.18.40 AM.png (206KB, 2476x914px) Image search: [Google]

206KB, 2476x914px

holy fuck VTR

10btc wall fell in the last fucking 30 minutes!!!!

File: [アニメ BD] ギャラクシーエンジェル 第3期(AA) 第47-48話「とにかくエンジェルモーニングセット／星の子ソーセージ」(1424x1072 HEVC 10bit FLAC softSub(chi+eng) chap).mkv_snapshot_01.52_[2017.01.17_22.54.12].jpg (124KB, 1424x1072px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 1424x1072px

>>2290931
>>2290937
>>2290938
>>2290967
>>2290978
Thanks boys, I sold (half) out DGB as soon as I could at 1973 sat and bought into VTR and it has been a pretty damn good decision so far.

Vtr will finish it's pump soon then dump hard. Dgb will slowly recover, stew for a day or two then pump again

>>2291294
You're welcome man

VTR too stronk

>>2291307

Highly unlikely. DGB is a known scam.

vtr 24hr volume only 30 btc

dgb is 35,000 btc.

>>2291317
This. VTR has potential

>>2291341
Mark my words VTR will be 500 btc volume in a day.

D G B
G
B

>>2291341

Agree with this so much - no point in buying a scamcoin you can't sell.

DGB is memes but people are buying memes these days

>>2291317

>source: my imagination

>>2290905
Why would DGB rise? Give me 1 good reason

DGB. The fudders have done s good job over the weekend driving down the price, before the jump they know is coming. 9th, Friday

File: 1491433090475.gif (4MB, 280x302px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 280x302px

>selling DGB just before the big event

Then again if you bought in at some silly shit like 1900 sats it probably dosent matter

If I say DGB will people dump VTR? If so then yes, DGB will rise more, because I want to buy some cheap VTR.

>>2291434
>>2291438
24 hours lads

>>2291444
Checked. Just threw in 1 BTC on VTR.

>>2291438
>>2291680
what will happen in 24 hours?

>>2291850
woudl like to know that too

June 22nd

>>2291889
no that's more than 24 hours

>>2291341
nigger DGB was at 100 sats with probably the same volume back then, don't judge a book by its cover.

>>2291850
>>2291867
maybe if you faggots actually researched coins you'd know