XRP $$

>>2098148
>Meanwhile retards panic sell again for no reason.

>>2098171
tards gonna tard

you're delusional, is crashing, never bumped the 24, we are at return to normal you fucking kike.

>>2098217
Yeah totally crashing.haha You sound like a kike trying to get the dip.

>>2098217
year 5777 is jubilee year. get some or stay poor faggot

I didn't know that a coin can be disgusting. Ripple is disgusting. Next up Hillary Clinton correcting the record on Ethereum.

>>2098240
>jubilee year
markets crash in jubilee year.

>>2098217

I hope it does crash. I hope it crashes all the way back to a fucking nickle. I will load up the back of my truck with XRP.

File: whitehats.jpg (99KB, 700x500px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 700x500px

>>2098254

>>2098266
fiat markets. kikes get rich

how the fuck is anyone mad at this coin on here? you have something building the blocks for mainstream support, launching again and again with pieces of the action being highly fucking accessible and people would prefer to sit back and talk shit?

SWIFT is a multi billion dollar operation that you never had a fucking chance of getting a chance to get in on, here on a silver fucking platter we have the fucking jewmaker and dickheads are still talking shit about it. I don't like the stay poor meme but fucking hell some of you really deserve it.

>>2098338

because there are actually idiots on biz who believed cryptos would upend the banking system. They now realize that bank ADOPTING the positive features of the crypto-world is a massive cockslap to their fantasy land.

>>2098338
I'm a maximalist in decentralization ideologically, but i'm also a pragmatist and there's shit loads of loot to be made as they roll out their one world government/market.

>>2098380
What I said at a cent and still communicate on here is taking a bet on your fantasy future is fine, any given coin still takes a little imagination to support and there are numerous opportunities we could imagine being really huge. This is the important part that most just ignore out of being too ignorant / detached form reality.

>COVER THE FUCKING BANKS

"""They""" remembering to include central banks, in all practical terms have unlimited fucking money, they ARE the money, and whether anyone likes it or not they have fucking smarter people on their payroll than /biz/.

You think these fuckers are going to rollover and be knocked by some shitcoin? Obviously these motherfuckers will be hedging on crypto and they're the fucking horse that has won all it's last races. At these fucking odds you take that bet every fucking time.

File: 1495059232590.jpg (19KB, 318x322px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 318x322px

>Ripple isn’t creating any other cryptocurrencies or proprietary coins for banks. XRP is it. That means that Ripple success directly equals XRP success.
hahahahahahahahahahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhahaha

No bank is using or planing to use XRP

Ripple is a protocol, an OPEN protocol, the public ripple network is merely an implementation of this protocol, there is no benefit to using the public network, especially for what for the banks want it for, money transmittance.

http://www.cnbc.com/2017/03/01/japanese-banks-plan-to-adopt-blockchain-for-payments.html
>the 47-member consortium used technology from blockchain start-up Ripple for a cloud-based payments platform called RC Cloud.

RC Cloud is a private network based on the ripple protocol, this is the only way banks will use ripple, no bank will ever use the public ripple network, let alone XRP.

XRP is not stock, the entire banking industry can run on the ripple protocol and you won't see one red cent.

>>2098431

You post the same shit in every fucking XRP thread. How many times do you have to be proven wrong?

>>2098431

Except that even if it weren't true, ownership of XRP is basically a share in the success of Ripple, which is privately held and otherwise unobtainable.

>>2098431
>Ripple solutions lower the total cost of settlement by enabling banks to transact directly and with real-time certainty, optionally using the digital asset XRP to further reduce liquidity costs. Banks around the world are partnering with Ripple to improve their cross-border payment offerings, and to join its growing, global network of financial institutions and liquidity providers.

Yes nigger, it is not set in stone banks will use XRP or even adopt ripple itself, if it were the price would be many times more the value it is now, and that in essence is the bet.

>>2098431
30% benefit to using XRP. Keep talking shit though.

>>2098541
Optimistic guesstimate

Buying 5k worth

File: 1414463802254.jpg (74KB, 496x515px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 496x515px

>>2098431

Listen asshole, it's really simple.

You have your conviction, BET ON IT.

I'll bet the other way.

No need to get bent out of shape.

In the end, everyone gets exactly what they are owed.

>>2098547
From their value proposal. They save 30% by using Ripple's ledger and another 30% by using XRP. Doesn't take a genius to see banks will follow the savings.

>>2098552
Yeah you're owed a spot in a debtors' prison.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!

FUCKING RIPPLE!! AHHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!! MORE LIKE "RIP ANON'S MONEY"!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!

RETARDS!! LMAOING SO HARD AT YOUR IMPENDING FAILURE!

>>2098564
what.

>>2098583
AHAHAHAHAHAHA DUMB RIPPLECOINER! MORE LIKE MENTALLY C-RIPPLED! AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!

>>2098595
hey sorry you missed out bud, but shit it's not like i didn't ask you aboard

File: coppelion_handarrow_04-1.png (1MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x720px

>>2098564
That's actually pretty hilarious though, ripple - rip off

File: 1315949095120.jpg (26KB, 548x459px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 548x459px

>>2098513
>>2098529
>>2098539
No one has ever refuted anything I've said.

>ownership of XRP is basically a share in the success of Ripple
hahahahahahhaha

Does XRP give you dividends from Ripple? Does XRP give you voting rights to the board of Ripple? Does Ripple have a legal fiduciary duty to XRP holders? No. No. No.

XRP is not stock, XRP is extraneous to the success of the ripple protocol, no bank is using or planning to use or considering using XRP.

These are the facts.

>>2098634

Oh, god. What an annoying cuck. You won't drive the price down, you retard.

If you don't like it, just stop and go make money buying whatever other altcoin you like.

You post the same shit in every XRP thread, and you always get your ass handed to you.

I don't hold any XRP, because I don't like long term holds. But I'm not here being an insufferable cunt like you are.

If they lose money holding XRP, it's their problem, not yours.

File: 1323053000700.jpg (34KB, 350x468px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 350x468px

>>2098541
1) These numbers were pulled out of Ripple's ass, and are the product of assuming zero hedging for currency conversions to and from XRP. Given the +20% D A I L Y variations in XRP price, transmittance in XRP would, in actuality, be obscenely expensive

2) The public ripple network is just that, A ripple network. Ripple is an open protocol, even if using a native token WERE cheaper, it would still behoove banking conglomerates to create their own ripple network, with their own native token, which they could control completely. As I already pointed out, the much vaunted banking adoptees are doing just that

>>2098711
They want to make XRP stable, by locking up coins, and setting a higher price, you cunt.

>>2098634
>Does XRP give you dividends from Ripple?

Do you consider a 1200% profit a dividend?

>>2098634
>>ownership of XRP is basically a share in the success of Ripple

>Does XRP give you dividends from Ripple? Does XRP give you voting rights to the board of Ripple? Does Ripple have a legal fiduciary duty to XRP holders? No. No. No.

Licks tears but can't read.

>Basically a share in the success of company.

Owning bitcoin is basically a share in the success of bitcoin. Only difference is Ripple is a company.

Keep trying though.

>>2098711
Why don't you read the article..

"Why is Ripple not creating proprietary coins for banks and instead encouraging them to use XRP?

It’s simple, actually. “Every bank wants their name on it, but no bank wants any other bank’s name on it,” explains Thomas. “So it presents this stalemate where they all create their own coin but then maybe can’t get anyone else but their own daughter banks and their own club to use it, at which point the value isn’t there. Settlement assets are valuable if they’re widely accepted across all organizations.”

Which is why Ripple has been able to get so much traction already, as they’re a neutral party to work with, as opposed to another big bank—and why XRP, not a bunch of other proprietary coins, is the solution that Ripple is exclusively selling to banks."

>>2098667
Again, no one has ever refuted anything I've said.

>I don't hold any XRP
I do, as I have a very low option of the intelligence of you bull-run crypto-cucks.

This doesn't interfere with my ability to accurately assess the long-term value of XRP

>>2098711
It will stabilize when the market capitalization is right. There are also going to be liquidity providers who will assume the risk of volatility to ensure $x in value is transferred and $x received.

>>2098634
what am i supposed to be refuting? banks HAVE been using it in cross border trials, that is fact, whether they adopt and continue to use it i don't know any better than you do. but rather than flat out call it impossible, which it isn't, i took the punt on it because i liked the odds and won.

>>2098724
>They want to make XRP stable, by locking up coins
>but they can "produce" the same amount from thin air at any time

w e w
e
w

>>2098764
>Why can the Federal Reserve print money, and I can't?? Fucking jews :(

>>2098750
>FUDS XRP but bets on bull run.

Hmmm sounds like a genius trader. Plz teach.

>>2098747
XRP has no traction in the banking sector, as has been pointed out again and again, banks are interested in the protocol, not the token.

>>2098742
But it's not. Success of Ripple is entirely independent of the success of XRP

>>2098724
XRP would be lucky to ever have the stability of fiat, let alone supernatural stability that allows for the doing away of hedging, further, a publicly traded asset will never be as stable as a token whose value is determined by decree.

File: 1495059232509.jpg (32KB, 470x698px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 470x698px

>>2098800
I also bought a lot of shit stocks during the boom, I'm not a simpleton, so it's not a herculean task to separate my disgust of garbage assets and my ability to read the market well enough to profit from you retards.

The XRP pump was driven by normie (trollbox tier) hype and speculation.What you're seeing now is a typical exit strategy used by the whales, the real holders, to get out as high as the can. Repeated pumps and dumps with dwindling volume.

The normies bag holders are now losing patience at seeing their beloved token getting jack hammered repeatedly. Sentiment has switched and denial is setting in. You're getting dumped on as we speak just like the LTC shills did, just like the dash shills did, just like the XMR shills did.

If you didn't sell at 2400 you fucked up. Sorry. If you bought above 2000 you fucked up. If you bought sub-1000 and still hold, well done but don't be greedy. Greed is the number 1 way to watch you profit evaporate.

It's not coming back.

>>2098851
XRP in a strong second bolstered by the bank involvement will invite further inflows from normie investors on its own

File: 1494788484847.gif (996KB, 348x258px) Image search: [Google]

996KB, 348x258px

>>2098148
sell your cripple or die trying

you've been warned /biz/

>>2098851
It's been one day.. this post is sad.

>>2098874
>Says the Jews that want to buy the dips.

>>2098883
>Will XRP volatility scare off banks from using it?
>It’s a great question, but here’s why it doesn’t make a difference. If a Bank A buys one million XRP and it takes ten seconds to transfer to Bank B, and during those ten seconds the price of XRP goes down by just one tenth of a penny, that’s $1,000 USD that evaporated during the transfer. That’s huge. We asked Thomas how banks will solve this. He said it’s simple: they’ll just use a liquidity provider (read: volatility lessening service), and it makes sense. The liquidity provider will assume the risk of market swings while the tokens are in transit and sometimes they’ll come out ahead and sometimes they come out behind.

really makes you ripple

>>2098851
>Said the non-XRPer.

Buy a gun before you put your money into RDD like a retard.

Also, everybody in here knows that, you dumbcunt. This is a speculative market. We have seen coins raise x20 just based on news. You are the only dumbnut in here that doesn't know that.

DGB has nothing going for it. Steam, Riot, other games, won't implement that shit, don't be dumb. XRP has a real utility.

Can the bag holders take screen shots of what they're holding at this point in time and post please. I want to make one of those collages for 2 weeks time.

File: screenshot_17-05-2017 22.45.12.png (15KB, 962x350px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 962x350px

last chance biz

>>2098892
I don't understand, it says DGB can be earned playing CS, LOL and WOW... is this bullshit?

>Once you have signed up for DigiByte Gaming go to your "My Profile" page (or click on your profile image in upper right hand corner.)

From there click the + icon to link your League of Legends, Steam or Battle.net account. You can link all three and earn as you play all three games.

>>2098892
DESU the amount of anit rdd shills rivals the pro rdd shills, really makes me think

File: 1420678574305.png (24KB, 128x128px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 128x128px

>>2098851

>Reaches highest historical value on a daily basis

>Just like today

>It's ogre

Now this is just sad.

You greedy fuckers want to buy in at a depressed price for enhanced gains, don't you?

Sad.

>>2098930
Yes, it is.

They would need to have a contract with multi million companies.

The reality is, that you can earn DGB playing games, yes. But only on their servers, using unofficial mods. If you play CS GO, LOL or WOW (I don't even know how the fuck they would implement that shit in wow) you would know how retarded this is.

So it's basically BS.

The price increased, because of shills shilling their shitcoin based on lies.

>>2098971
Would people that wanted a money game have a problem playing on their servers?

File: Untitled.png (35KB, 704x240px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 704x240px

>>2098899
ok pic related

>>2098990
damn congrats, man.

I only have 3k lol. I got in a bit late : /

>>2098982
They would have to mod their games.

Nobody who plays CS GO, will ever use that shit. Because everybody who does, plays competitively on official servers, not on modded shit servers.

Minecraft, I don't know.

>>2098990

"hurrr durr hurr your stupid scam coin!! REEEE!!!!"

nice gains anon, better than mine ;)

>>2099000
Modded shit servers yes I get, but is it impossible for those modded shitservers to ever be trusted enough for these types of games? How is it done at the moment with skin wagers, does some server facilitate this or is it based basically on parties honoring deals? I don't game competitively myself

>>2099017
honestly, yes it is.

DGB has literally nothing backing it making any game want to use it in any real capacity.

>>2099026
>>2099017

If DGB paired with any game for anything it would boost it's value. after minecraft, who knows where it'll expand to

>>2099017
its not an awful idea to leave a little in it though and just diversify. you can use some of those ripple gains if you arent hodling.

XBY is also a good coin to look into. but as always, make all judgements yourself friend : )

>>2099017
Don't know what skin wagers are.

You get skins and boxes randomly. Not more than 3 times a week. You can get better skins by buying $1,95 keys to open the boxes. But it's implemented directly in the game, unlike DGB.

No. Most people play on official servers. If you play on unofficial servers, you can't rank up, which is why CS GO is fun.

Also, I don't know how they are planning on implementing something like that on CS GO.

I think they are telling half truth's, to get more people on this and then dump.

>>2099043
ooohhh boy.

it IS NOT partnered with minecraft.

all they did was make their own private server. something literally anybody can do. so now you can join their server and use DGB to pay for shit you can get for free in any other server.

seriously... nobody is backing them.

>>2099056

Senpai just be open for a minute. only someone who plays minecraft would know that. so you play minecraft. if what you say is true, why would you not find dgb appealing as an idea, there is going to be a casino, right? sounds like you're upset about something.

>>2099045
oh yeah certainly in other coins as well, slowly been offloading XRP itself onto some others mainly eth, it's just been by far the most exposive, ETH would be the 2nd best performing to now that I hold. Already taken the bet on XBY and still hodling some of that.
>>2099052
skin betting was something like a 7.5 billion market last year, right now they're the 'matchsticks' for the unregulated gambling on CS or whatever, I wonder if DGB could replace that.

>>2099096
by the way i believe valves been in a bit of strife over this, which i assume would further hamper any official support for something like dgb

File: [Leopard-Raws] Okusama ga Seitokaichou! Plus! - 05 RAW (ATX 1280x720 x264 AAC).mp4_snapshot_02.20_[2016.11.03_01.53.03].jpg (418KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

418KB, 1280x720px

>>2098148
NOICE

>>2098148
>Ripple and XRP
>and
Their editors have a slim paycheck.

>>2099094
no, it doesnt interest me at all... because all you can buy with DGB is stuff from their minecraft server... stuff you can get for FREE on any other minecraft server.

I am mad, because people think they are actually making some sort of advancement. they just did something that 13 year olds do routinely... the definition of nothing special.

File: IMG_5416.jpg (147KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 960x720px

>>2099139

I go to bed every night hopeful. You go to bed every night foul and angry. That's what this is about. You just urinate in peoples punch bowls or whatever it is. DGB has potential and saying otherwise is just bixnood

>>2099182
be hopeful on things with promise.

Stupid is what annoys me, dont be it.

>disclaimer: I own this thing I'm shilling

File: pos.png (26KB, 585x426px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 585x426px

>>2098899

>>2099213
And that was yesterday kek

>>2099139
>>2099197
I'm not interested in using DGB myself either, but I am interested in the fact there is a fast growing 7 billion+ matchstick market for esports gambling with skins alone.

Expanding the scope we have BTC which may be tough to crack, but the kicker there is the DGB angle of being earned in game which I reckon lands it at some point between skins and BTC. I don't have numbers on BTC esports gambling, just that overall gambling is suspected to make up trillions in value transacted annually. Aside from that we have some ETH looking like it's going to enter these markets via tokens like EDG.

Basically I see DGB as a valid attempt to consolidate the awkward methods currently in place, but it does look like it will be tough for it to get up.

File: Screenshot_2017-05-18-17-19-08-78.png (124KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 720x1280px

>>2098899