Okay so how much of a problem is the large bitcoin collider?

>>2061014
It's just an experiment to do with quantum coinchanics

File: btc imp date.png (100KB, 282x535px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 282x535px

>>2061014

>>2061014
The only problem is that SHA256 is unbreakable

oh yeh also

installing the LBC allowed root access to do whatever the fuck they wanted to your comp

>>2061014
The chance of finding an actual wallet is extremely extremely low. Also keep in mind 99% of wallets are empty.
It'd be more profitable to just mine actual coins.

>>2061448
They are hoping for one of the big hits tho nigga. Its like buying lotto tickets. ANother reason ethereum better. All in all its a problem.

>>2061463
*Not an immediate one but will get worse overtime as quantum coinchanics as user points out above gets more intense

>>2061463
For a wallet that contains more that $1 it is around 1% of 1% of 1% of 1% of 1% of 1% of 1% of 1% of 1% of 1% of 1% of 1% of 1% 1% of 1% of 1% of 1% f 1% of 1% of 1% of 1% of 1% of 1% of 1% of 1% of 1% of 1% of 1% of 1% of 1% of 1% of 1% of 1% of 1% of 1% of a 1% chance.

File: maxresdefault.jpg (50KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 1280x720px

>>2061502
so youre saything theres a chance?

>>2061014
>Okay so how much of a problem is the large bitcoin collider
Close to zero problem.

It can only find keys that were generated improperly. So, there may be one or two shitty wallet softwares out there which could lose some people money. This isn't really new.

>>2061510
hahah. solid poast.