To make things clear, I want gains. My portfolio basically consists of 1/3 PIVX and 2/3 ETH. I'm considering adding a new powerhouse that isn't too risky. Thinking of either STRAT or Golem, relatively safe bets, or XBY, that seems to have a potential of huge gains.
What would y'all recommend?
hold golem long-term, play XBY short-term if at all
STRAT could be nice if it dips to 50k satoshis
POSW
Thank me in 3 months
>>2009244
no thanks Pajeet. Scam somebody else please.
Why dosent GNT/ETH show up on Blockfolio?
>>2009246
You're going to be so mad that you listened to the Fudders and missed out on the huge gains that those brave enough to hold PoSW are going to make.
XBY supercedes all coins right now because of the invention of a new consensus system
XBY > everything else, no contest
>>2009195
RLC. Will be worth 500 mill soon.
>>2009195
Golem is a long-term hold
>>2009195
Buy NEM before it moons
>>2010718
how long term is Golem and why?
>>2009242
Where do you create your charts?
>>2010838
www.tradingview.com/chart
>>2010889
>unique
Newbie here, willing to get educated. What's unique about XBY?
>>2010906
Absolutely nothing is special about it, it's a shitcoin just look at the Bitcointalk thread about it
>>2010906
It's Proof of Signature. As opposed to Proof of Stake (PIVX, DASH, POSW) or Proof of Work (BTC, ETH).
That's about all I know.
>>2010928
Borzalam is a deaf indian guy, but he is inventing POSig, thats an instant top 20 coin
>>2011033
He's Hungarian.
How does one get into Golem? Can't find an exchange for it
>>2010889
>>2010515
>>2009202
XBY website looks like one of you hired a pajeet to do it.
It looks so fucking unprofessional and the grammar is woeful, if you are trying to sell something new and upcoming, presentation is key, all this presents is some half-arsed coin, the technology is nice but this just looks shady
>>2011071
GNT on Poloniex friendo
>>2011071
polo
>>2011103
The marketing guy is an old christian boomer listen to how he talks. He said the website is temporary they will update it later
The text needs reworking but the current version looks pretty solid to me.
>>2011168
compared to golem's site, it looks like absolute garbage
It says that per transaction there is a fee of 100 XBY?
Am I misunderstanding this, doesn't that seem too high?
>>2011103
That was in the beginning.
New web site is
Xtrabytes.tech
Also New marketing
>>2012578
looks like shit
KEK says 1 million sats
>>2009195
Golem = Supercomputing
RLC = Cloud storage
What exactly does Xtrabyte do that RLC doesn't? Is it just more secure?
>>2013019
proof of signature
>>2013019
We also have the power of divine intervention