Segwit will be activated for DGB in the next few days. Will DGB moon after this? There is already a steady increase for the last few weeks.
>>1966669
goddammit i got out to early again :'(
no one?
i put .1 btc in at 90 sats. can we expect a comfy ride /biz/ bros?
>bought at 69
>dipped hard after that
>sold at 72
gotta hit the dumbbells I guess
estimated moon price?
>>1967029
750-800+
>Only the beginning
This segwit meme hit several coins.
Induced a mild pump but dont expect a moon...
>segwit
this has become a meme, shitcoins are slapping segwit on themselves to get people to buy it and then dumb it all
just look at litecoin, literally dead for 3-4 years untill the segwit meme started of bitcoin's failure, and it's being manipulated by gooks so they can buy low and sell high
>>1967788
>factual useful technology that will enable lighting networks are a meme
If Litecoin gets it it will be huge, not sure about the rest.
>>1968438
>Factual uselful meme meme meme buzzword
>Malleability exploit
It's not a problem if you don't use a second layer
>Lightning Network
Off-blockchain transactions is the worst thing that could happen to crypto
It's not a durable scaling method, it's not secure, it's not convenient and it goes against the basics of the blockchain
The only solution for scalabilty is ON-CHAIN, not with some meme fixes
Litecoin does not need segwit since it does not have scaling issues like bitcoin. It's just a BTC testnet.
>>1968465
>4chan shitposter giving lessons to Nick Szabo aka satoshi
http://bitcoinist.com/nick-szabo-bitcoin-censorship-resistance/
go back to /r/btc
>>1968472
>Pro SegWit shill has quoted Szabo discussing Lightning
First, Szabo is not Nakamoto, this theory has long been debunked by studies on the writing style of Satoshi.
If you had read the original whitepaper by Nakamoto you would realize how dumb LN is. Yes it would allow faster transactions, but at what cost? The need to re-insert trust and third parties in a transaction, A second layer for off chain transactions is the death of tx immutability and security.
>Go back to /r/btc
/r/btc is moderated by BitcoinCore devs, retard, you can't criticize SegWit without being instantly censored.
Your post screams of ignorance