Making cash

Raytheon, General Dynamics, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman.

>>1954427
Pretty much nailed it.

Don't forget other contractors that provide intel services and the like, such as BAH.

>>1954425
The Hiroshima nuke was 15 kiltons btw, not tons.

>>1954427
Ah thanks...yes I like real companies in not into bitcoin shit...check out CTRV soon to release data on hep B drug

>>1954425
Might want to invest in some European companies as well, like Thales or Dassault.

>>1954501
Thank you very much...also check out XXII

>>1954531
>>1954473

thanks, good to know.

>>1954425
>hiroshima bomb smaller
GOD WHEN WILL THIS FUCKING MEME DIE HOW IS AMERICA SO SCIENCE ILLITERATE THAT THEY DON'T KNOW METRIC PREFIXES

The moab is 15 tons. The hiroshima bomb is 11 kiltons, or 11,000 tons. It's nearly 800 times more powerful.

It makes sense, too, because conventional explosives are very inefficient by mass. They usually weigh nearly as much if not more than their explosive yield in TNT equivalent, but NUCLEAR weapons convert their mass to energy in the "most efficient" possible process (not to say that they actually achieve this efficiency, but in theory there is no way to get more energy per mass than nuclear fission) and therefore are enormously more potent than TNT by mass.

Physical guns and bullets pull all cash out of stocks

>>1954557
Haha autism...dude I just picked a random war pic I just saw..i could have posted a booty pic but I needed it to relate to this up and coming conflict..as my message stated..im here to invest not science. Sooo on that note what's your stock picks?

>>1954427
ITA

File: 1485438623277.png (61KB, 450x450px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 450x450px

>>1954557
I think they purposefully left out the kilo prefix to make the image more provocative.
>OMG, this bomb almost has as much boomies than a nuke!!! D:

>>1954577
So they straight up lied

Please don't pretend this is an exaggeration or slight inaccuracy--they straight up told a false story in order to make something "more provocative"

It's like saying 9/11 had 2.4 million people die instead of 3,000 (800 times), because 2.4 million is a "more provocative" number

(i admit that getting deaths right is more important than blast yields, but the principle is the same)

>>1954599
9/11 never even happened
wake up pleb

>>1954557
>It's nearly 800 times more powerful.
1500 nigger not 800 you can't read or just bad at math or what?

>>1954615
11,000 / 15 = 733 or 'nearly 800'

>>1954621
nigger 15 kilotons vs 11 tons are you dumb?
roughly 1363