How the fuck is twitter worth 11 billion?

It has a massive log of metadata worth troves if exploited with modern tools correctly, a large backend of servers and technical assets, a widely recognized brand, and a large userbase.

Do you intuitively see the value or does someone have to simplify it?

>>1865276
>Guys I made a search engine in VB.net. Took me like 20 minutes. How the fuck is google worth 80 bagillion?:
the thread.

>>1865296
And yet it's still a garbage company.
How'd that happen?

>>1865361
Google is worth it. Twitter is the whore at googles valedictorian party

>>1865276
at least they have Trump. whereas Snapchat is worth 23.82B with no real plan of making money. ever.

>>1865276
all explained here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDp7SXhqC5g&t=142s

>>1865910
>Dorsia

;-)

>>1865374

Because the troves of valuable and exploitable metadata are locked behind two primary components:

1. A gap in the existence and use of analytical tools applied to the metadata through the back end.
2. A knot of corporate ineptitude in management.

A buyout allows a reshuffling of the board, which would lead to a reshuffling of management, allowing the second hurdle to be surmounted. The yield of the first hurdle is a matter of speculation: whether you think the data is worth ~1 billion annually in yields, less than that, or more than that. So the price of the company is going to drift up and down until somebody buys in at a price that fits their speculative scheme. Meanwhile current shareholders will keep that management knot tight in order to obscure the company's true value vis a vis opaque management practices.

>>1865932
;-)
Dorsia. How impressive.
How on Earth did you get a reservation THERE?