THIS KINDA ETHER NEWS MAKES ME TINGLY

>>1859867
Its going to be ~300 USD by end of the year
Microsoft, IBM and Amazon are ripping each other apart trying to make sure they build blockchain solutions for banks, and identity management.Which blockchain? Ethereum

>>1859882
amazon is involved with a different closed blockchain
ibm has their own closed chain
microsoft is currently backing eth and ibm

microsoft alone is still huge support though

if you're going to shill, at least be honest

>>1859867
We're going to the moon lads. I can't fucking wait.

>>1859888
Intel
Chase


Google blockchain alliance

>>1859888
Would a privately developed blockchain do well vs Ethereum?

Would it be as widely accepted?

>>1859958
No it's for brainless companies that pay by the hour for app hosting on them.

File: the_call_you_have_to_take.jpg (39KB, 600x638px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 600x638px

Game of coins

>>1859952
I'm well aware of the eea, I watched the conference
I just don't like disinformation, eth is strong enough it doesn't need lies
intel doesn't factor in much, and jp morgan is a bigger bank if you want to show industry support

>>1859958
a privately developed blockchain wouldn't have to be as strong as it's more secure and it's easier to get approved by regulators

there's already a few small investment banks running the ibm private blockchain to keep track of records

there are advantages on being a public chain though like scalability and cost

a private chain wouldn't have a public coin