[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

"""the productivity gap""""

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 5
Thread images: 2

File: fredgraph2.png (284KB, 4672x1800px) Image search: [Google]
fredgraph2.png
284KB, 4672x1800px
Why are families so shit at managing their money than individuals? Seems to me that individuals are more productive than families hence their wage growth has been higher with respect to productivity.
>>
>>1837678
>Why are families so shit at managing their money

What does money management have to do with income? Unless you're working at a bank maybe...

>Seems to me that individuals are more productive than families
Really? You think children, elderly, pregnant women, disabled people and housewives might be less productive than singles working full-time? Wow, what a novel insight!

For starters, this graph is about household income, not family income. And personal income and household income are not two seperate things (aka singles vs families) you can simply contrast. Household income includes the personal incomes of everyone who lives there.

Without looking deeper into it, I would rather assume that this is the result of the single lifestyle. Less people start families, less partnerships are long-term and stable. If more people stay single, more households are founded, dragging the average household income down in relative terms compared to personal income.

If A and B live together and each earn $100 in 1993 and $120 in 2015, their household income is $200/$240. But if they split up in 2006, in 2016 you'll have 2 households with only $120 household income, dragging the average down without any impact on productivity (as you seem to claim).
>>
>>1837715
Don't get so salty, anon. It's just 2/10 bait.
>>
>>1837895
Since when are facts and conjecture with a bit of banter "salty"?
>>
File: IMG_0605.gif (1MB, 250x333px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0605.gif
1MB, 250x333px
>>1837911

Since you entered the cesspool that is 4chan
Thread posts: 5
Thread images: 2


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.