How are my mgt bag holders?

didnt that stock die

>>1815424
>up 25% today
Wow, a whole 19 cents.

File: MGTwits.png (255KB, 1396x678px) Image search: [Google]

255KB, 1396x678px

>>1815424

>>1815424

There is still some hope left.

Lol I sold when it was MGT and it was at 4.50

I wonder if the Gringo documentary hurt John?

>>1815509
I don’t know shit about MGT specifically, but 25% is 25%

>>1815424
Still holding. Honestly just waiting for it to be put on nasdaq

>>1815424
yes

>>1815431
its mgti now

>>1815509
>>1815571

Hes right 25% is 25%, for those that avged down, they are in heaven right now

>>1815591
Still holding also. only like 1k shares but ehh maybe one day it will be next norton or mcafee again.

>>1815571
>>1815627
19 cent gain
25% is 25%
Yeah, because what you really want in a stock is something you have to buy 5,000 shares of in order to make a decent profit.

>>1815627
Wtf. My mgt just disappeared from my account it didn't become mgti. It was like $100 worth dirty banker you know whats

File: nocoinersbtfooooooo.png (116KB, 1663x847px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 1663x847px

>buying stock from a meme company of some idiot that won the meme lottery instead of being part of the financial revolution made by an egoless anonymous genius
Serves you well.

>>1815647

lets say you have $1000

whether you buy 1 $1k stock or 10000 $.10 stock, its the same. 1 1k will have less risk but same shit.

Hell made a killing off $mstx had like 18k stock in its at .10 and it went to .17 and sold. Regardless of the amount, still made 70% profit.

>>1816157
>1 1k will have less risk
And less commission.
And more transparency.
And more liquidity.

>same shit
So no, not the same at all.

>lets say you have $1000
There's your problem. You're limited by how much cash you have, so you seek artificial leverage by buying penny stocks. If you had more, you would buy less risky, more expensive equities.

>>1816162
not this guy, but comission isn't based on order volume. also explain to me how you have more liquidity with a lower amount of shares, it's entirely based on daily volume.

am i being trolled?

>>1816167
Some people unironically believe expensive shares are better cos they're more expensive

>>1815647
What, you think a $10/share gain on a $1000/share stock is better?

The best trade I've ever done was a 0.003 gain. That was a 30% gain with my entire account when I only had 3k and put it all into GBSND when it dropped to $0.01 and rebounded on Jan 24

>>1815424
REMINDER: YOUR RETARDED KEK SHITCOINS AND STOCKS HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH /BIZ...

sage sage sage sage sage sage sage sagesage sage sage sage!

>>1815424

right here nigga