What went wrong?
>>1799415
is that the official logo
>>1799415
russians
>>1799418
Heh, I think we found what went wrong OP
it was just trying to capitalize on ethereum hype
>>1799415
ethers copycat, but didnt even manage to achieve litecoin status.
>>1799872
No, I didn't this
Overbought, some nasty delays, bitcoin rising. But the project is still good looking and honestly getting in waves is probably the safest and most potential having option right now giving current price and teams progress. But who knows, this is crypto.
>>1800740
this, it's definitely not a $24m project. Maybe $200,000. Same with that other shitcoin Lisk.
>>1800877
I wouldnt call waves a shitcoin. I invested reasonable amount during current dip and I am ready to wait couple months if I have to.They had some setbacks in the beginning but features are now coming thick and fast and market doesnt move its only question of time when will it see its first pump. At the moment I think its the best coin for both shorterm and longterm
>>1801882
can these alt-coins be sustained? there are so many and they all claim to have USPs and niches, but which of them are useful?
they might have new feature coming as you say, but isn't the die cast? people will only see waves as a russian shitcoin, so how can it get a good rep?
what real world use does it have? what is the elevator pitch, how would i explain it to my grandfather? i got the ICO and made some cash, but nothing i read about it ever sounded useful to me or anyone i know.