>bought a 500k painting >still renting lmao idk what im doing

>buying the art jew

>>1767835
try r9k

File: 1485844177943.png (238KB, 439x439px) Image search: [Google]

238KB, 439x439px

>>1767835
>buying stock intending to hold it long time
>everyone on /biz/ is instead a day trader, currency trader, alternative currency trader, gold bug, silver bug, nuclear materials bug, penny stock trader, or forex trader

>>1767852
>"oh hey I'm working on my masters in econ, I should check the board for finance and see what's up, maybe have some cool discussions.."
> 46 threads on bitcoin, 23 on robinhood, 1000^999 "I have X amount of monopoly money, what do?" later
>"nope.jpg"

But yet I still keep criticizing the retards here

Sigh

File: 1485817529123.png (327KB, 340x547px)

327KB, 340x547px

>>1767856
It's ok, knowing that there are others that make boring trades like me gives me warm fuzzies

>>1767856
>masters in econ
this is /biz/ not /dismalscience/ econ has always been a fraudulent science. but please continue to tell everyone they are retards while you stay poor.

>>1767856
>>1767835
>implying art is a bad investment

If you have a decent eye for up and coming talent there's vast amounts of money to be made, why do you think all proper rich people have art collections, they almost always go up in value if you aren't retarded. My mum owns an art gallery and literally every artist she represents raised their prices every year, the secondary market reflects those changes.

is she eating a baby pokemon?

But if I can trade dgaz/ugaz correcty a few times in a row I would make millions...

File: 1485913136422.jpg (284KB, 2000x1333px) Image search: [Google]

284KB, 2000x1333px

>>1767835
What

The

Fuck

>>1767856
We really should just fucking leave.


>muh new alt coin to dah moon nocouners coping on suicide watch shitpostetc...

Shut up and eat your garbage

>>1768513
>dismal science
Would Thomas Carlyle approve of all the Jewing that goes on here?

But yes, Taleb is right about (((economics)))

>>1768628
Art isn't a good investment. Picasso's fluctuate in price. Public interest in an artist changes after a decade. You have to report the value of your paintings to the government, and it's subjective. Some people have to donate their inherited paintings to museums because they literally can't afford to pay taxes on them. That, and appraisers are so terrified of accidentally appraising a counterfeit they sometimes refuse to make an appraisal.

>>1770567
But that's the best part of it, it's so easy to misrepresent the value of art, not on shit like Picasso obviously but the vast majority of artists are unknown to the general public and the government is none the wiser to their value

That's a big rice ball