How much government should there be?

>anarcho-communist
?????

>>1751137
>no fascist
wats the point?

>>1751174
Fascist could be communist, socialist, or even minarchist libertarian.

>>1751173
Collective property without government I think. I don't know how it's supposed to work.

>>1751207
>Fascist could be communist, socialist, or even minarchist libertarian.
you are retarded

>>1751208
I'm not familiar with fascism. I think of it as an authoritarian government, but I guess there are other definitions.

>>1751216
As far as I know, fascism is defined by an authoritarian government that does NOT own the means of production. Instead, it delegates that power to private companies.

>>1751224
Sounds like a variation of socialism.

>>1751137
Who else /nightwatchmanstate/ here

>>1751137
Whats a balance between socialist and capitalist?

I believe in the free market to an extent, but that there should also be saftey nets for housing / food / healthcare / educatuon for the working class. And I do mean WORKING class, not the welfare / NEETbux class.

>>1752252
OP can't put the status quo down as an option because that would be like admitting that it works best and most people prefer it.

>>1752283
Thats not really the status quo though.

Currently you have to be the welfare class (not working) to have any real saftey nets. There is a large gap in the working class where you cant afford shit but you make too much money for help.

>>1752295
this depends on where you live. In a HCOL area there is indeed a large gap. In a LCOL area people on welfare may live better than the average worker.

this produces interesting political trends where people in LCOL areas resent welfare while people in HCOL areas don't understand the resentment over benefits they personally couldn't survive on.

either way your choice is far closer to the status quo than any option OP provides. Presumably this is because OP is young and stupid. Young and stupid people often think they'd benefit from change.