So i was talking with a friend that plans to open a lab. He plans to hire a Master's graduate (with 0 experience) for $14/hr... says that $14 is an upgrade from her current job in retail for $12/hr.
Fair enough, supply/demand from an economic POV. Still though, I doubt that person will be producing only $14/hr even for their first year...
I also know of a friend that worked as an engineer for 13/hr in her first year. I can't help but feel that being a wage slave is a retarded idea if the employer is keeping the entire pie to himself.
Question is, by how much do employers generally jew their wageslaves?
how do we find out what the real value that employee is adding to the company, to find out (((employers))) profit off their slave labour.
>>1702628
Impossible startup idea: create an interface which allows employees and employers to explore the roots of profitable production at their company
>>1702635
socialism then
Your "friend" is a piece of shit
Where are you located so I can find him and bludgeon him to death with a rusty pipe?
My first job, in an engineering business (as an engineer) where all shares are owned by the CEO:
Salary: £20,000
Overhead Costs inc Salaries: £1,200,000
Overhead Costs exc Salaries: £200,000
Gross Profit: £2,000,000
Total Employees: 20
If we assume the average salary is £30,000 then that means:
CEO salary: £400k/yr
Dividends: £800k/yr
So, exploiting the wageslaves by a factor of three, and that's looking purely at profit. If you looked at turnover, it would be more like a factor of ten.
>>1702628
>Question is, by how much do employers generally jew their wageslaves?
If the employee job hops to better jobs, they are gaining from experience with little to no upfront risk. The Jewed has become the the Jewer