Looking for a dev, yes paid

>>1687705
As a matter of fact, a webdev would probably be quite useful as well. Still a paid position but the c++ position is still a lot more profitable.

Requirements:
> Wordpress
> Php
> Databases

>>1687705
Hello. Give me your money

>>1687707
webdev here, I'm not looking for a position as I run my own company, but we could make some sites for you if that's what you need. PHP and Databases are basically all we do.

Send me an email to [email protected] and I'll send you a portfolio/our site/etc if you're interested.

>>1687739
Grats on your own company. Got one as well. Mail is out

>>1687742
not sure if the mail had an error sending. want to give me yours? if not, try [email protected]

>>1687749
Second mail is out. Worst case, drop a mail to this address -> [email protected]

File: ss+(2016-04-09+at+03.01.52).jpg (222KB, 1352x756px) Image search: [Google]

222KB, 1352x756px

>>1687754
will do. taking off to a christmas party for now but i'll respond a bit later today

happy holidays and best of luck my dude

Fulltime web dev Interested in hearing more but I'm not working with a php/wordpress stack (literally vomit-tier).

>>1688646
U work with what i put on the table

>>1688646
This is what people mean by the entitled millenial attitude

>>1688783
I hear you. Like I would even consider employing that wannabe dev after making such an appearance

>>1688783
Why would I act like I'm here to suck his dick? I'm already a succesful web dev, I don't need him if he doesn't want my skills.

>>1688793
Ironically you are so much more likely to run into a wannabe dev with such a poor stack - GL friendo, you likely just lost your best bet and will have to find a """""web dev""""" who actually wants to work with such a shitty stack.

>>1688826
>Why would I act like I'm here to suck his dick? I'm already a succesful web dev, I don't need him if he doesn't want my skills.
You literally said you were interested in hearing more about the position you dumb fuck.

>>1688826
Whatever floats your boat anon

>>1688838
Yep, I 'literally' said that. How does that contradict what you just quoted? Ironic that you should call me a dumb fuck when you can't even follow a logical thought through one sentence, you dumb fuck.

>>1688855
Likewise. You'll probably be fine if your idea only requires blog-tier complexity.

>>1688868
Yeah probably. This specific task doesn't require a complex infrastructure. Designed the website myself, wrote my own php plugins, etc.

Hell it's only a 4 digit profit project, 5 best case. The only one worth paying at all would be the lead dev.

How long have you been in the biz? How's it going for you?

>>1688783
It's not the millenial attitude.
That shit is truly vomit inducing tier shit

C guy reporting in , frankly you wont get any serious offers apart from shit tier """programmers""" if you don't reveal any more details about the project, like the scope , time frame, portability requirements, what is the goal of the project etc.
Then again it does not seem that quality is what are you looking for anyway.

Just saying.

>>1688884
Started studying (and programming) roughly 3 years ago and am done with my degree in a month; found the studies too easy so I found a fulltime web dev job to do in parallel. Already prodding around a bit for higher paying jobs, but would rather work on something new that I can shape myself (was interested to see if your idea was relevant to this goal).

In short: If the profit/potential isn't higher than 4-5 digits I'm not overly interested, but GL.

>>1688902
If I learned one thing during my time of self employment then it's this; nobody cares about the quality of your product/service. It's about how you sell it. Also my customers are literally kids who steal dads credit card to buy my software. U'd enjoy reading some of the shit customer support receives.

> How do I pay with paypal?
> I am a trans with dyslexia. I don't understand your installation instructions. Call me on skype


>>1688903
I mean no offense anon but 3 years of programming isn't really worth anything. Yeah you might be able to make some money with webdev but I highly doubt this would ever challenge you.
Now that you mentioned a more challenging project with a higher profit margin, well I can provide you with exactly that. How's your math?

>>1688910
Please don't tell me you are selling bots on hackforums

>>1688915
Even if I would, $ is $
But no, I don't

>>1688918
Right , well in that case you can go in to managed languages like C# and java for cheaper """programmers"""

>>1688925
You are so right. If I chose C# instead of C++ i could easily have implemented integrated ads and offer a free version of my software. Would have made through ads than through sales.
> Feelsbadman.jpeg

>>1688926
i assume its not a 3d game or anything , if so its not that difficult to redo it in C# unless you have absolutely no programming skills at all.
hell C# does not even need Qt it has a part of the .net framework that handles GUI shit.
If you tell me more about the project and how much resources does it need exactly i can give pointers on if you should even hire a programmer.

>>1687705
Hey, mind sharing a link to your repository.
Just want to take a look at your C++ code.

>>1688931
Hey thanks a bunch, anon! Really appreciate it but I'm pretty confident that I know my way around programming.

To be honest, I never touched C# but I could most likely rewrite the software within 1 or 2 days. It's just not worth my time.

It's a stupid program, filling a certain niche for our brothers from /v/. After the release I was surpised how many fags attempted to pay with steam ingame items. So I found myself a partner who accepts such items (+commission aka twice the actual price) and then converts the items into real money.

Long story short, there is still a lot of potential to squeeze out. But not enough for me to bother.

>>1688935
Do you know why Winrar didn't sell?

>>1688946
Because they didn't make their code open source?

>>1688952
Listen anon, my main machines are all running BSD. I celebrate the opensource movement but I also celebrate the size of my wallet

>>1688957
IF you're worrying about copying your SRC, I could sign a NDA.
You can trust me Anon, I just want to take a look at your C++ code, so I can judge you :3

>>1688963
thanks I'm good mate

>>1688973
alrighty then

File: pepe (5).jpg (39KB, 528x492px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 528x492px

When I asked this guy how the job is "paid" he told me its paid through a percentage of the company, I then ask if this company has any sales. His response, "sure". Classic /biz/

>>1689099
Commission based payment terms apparently don't suit you

File: 1456052944245.gif (607KB, 800x792px) Image search: [Google]

607KB, 800x792px

>>1689105
Sure they do, but when your answer to "Any sales?" is "Sure, but not anymore" that's a huge red flag. Why would I work for commission when there is no sales? You're fucked

>>1689121
> But sales kinda halted when I stopped actively developing and marketing it.
That's why I intend to hire a dev. Suit yourself though

File: flat,800x800,070,f.jpg (78KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 800x800px

>>1689123
And this dev is suppose to market your software? Also when I said any sales, I wanted a rough #. Not "sure". Anyways good luck to you.

File: sales.png (57KB, 944x587px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 944x587px

>>1689129
Na only if he intends on increasing his commission

Guess when I stopped working on it

File: 1436379753070.jpg (39KB, 800x778px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 800x778px

>>1689131
Show us some numbers or fuck off. That chart could be going from 2 sales up to 10 a month. Whats the reason to hide it? Get out of here with your scheme to get cheap devs. Go hire a panjeet for $3/hour.

>>1689149
I don't intend to publish the numbers. Posted the pic to demonstrate why sales halted.
Besides, I made very clear that it's a 4-5 digit project. An easy way for a young dev to earn some money and gain some experience. Never said it's your dream 1 million dollar job, u salty frog poster

File: pepe (1).png (148KB, 500x656px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 500x656px

>>1689157
4-5 Digits even seems high for your product honestly. Just seems like a scheme to get cheap dev work. To each his own. Also, good luck getting anyone to work for you on a commission based contract that hasn't seen sales total.

>>1689163
> 4-5 Digits even seems high for your product honestly
I'm as surprised as you are

> Also, good luck getting anyone to work for you on a commission based contract that hasn't seen sales total.
You weren't the first nor the last one. Thanks though

File: 1456055569008.png (277KB, 1106x1080px) Image search: [Google]

277KB, 1106x1080px

>>1689168
Go hire a panjeet that is willing to work for $4/hour like I said.

Or is that out of your 4-5 digit budget? hahaha

>>1689176
Can pajeets code in C++ ?

>>1689224
sometimes yeah