Why is this website so shitty

I don't know but this is so true, the text is so out of place, not even centered, the text is randomly different sizes, the fucking "continue to this site" doesn't even have any ads on it, instead its a bunch of quotes from people I don't even want to know about.

Jesus, their fucking "top 25" or whatever lists make you click like 28 times to see a list, and the images are like so low quality.

The site is so cringeworthy.

File: Time_youcover01.jpg (37KB, 400x533px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 400x533px

>>1680091
Why is this magazine so shitty

Money.

They knew they were a top read in finance, and the big wigs on top decided to squeeze the lemon so hard they completely destroyed it.

The content looks like it was written by highschoolers, and is accurate about 15% of the time. It's swamped with more pop-ups than a porn tube site.

Basically the people on top said let's crash this ship and get shit rich in the process.

>>1680133

By shit rich I mean: Getting the high paying ads and cutting all costs on writing and web content.

>>1680091
>>1680133
they werent a top read in finance, it is the same reason the bloomberg app is so shit, they just hire /b/tards for IT

>>1680115
I used to like it. I got into Time when I was a young kid reading Time for Kids. Now the thing is pure shit. Probably because leftist "journalists" got hired when the older people retired.

The Economist
Financial Times
The Atlantic is the only lefty stuff with depth and relevancy.

twitter
newswire rss feeds for actual news (reuters, afp, pr newswire) this is where the blue chip news media get their news to begin with.


Everything else is a fucking joke.

>>1680107
It's all about the brand being a meme.

That's how you get rich, winning the meme lottery.

There are tons of websites exactly like that (its basically a clickbait website) that gets no traffic, but "Forbes" gets away with it and gets tons of clicks from normies.

Websites are just top whatever these days, nobody cares about talent, good writing etc anymore.

>>1680091
bcoz most magazines are. time lost its reputation since bruce jenner

its not shitty
people like u are shitty... and bitchy

>>1681317
its shit you prick

just generic clickbait viral shit

>>1680091

I love Forbes. They linked to my site within an article written 10 years ago. I still get traffic from it.