Is it true that the SEC monitors /biz/?
>>1672967
So? They monitor a lot of large public forums to flag non-public trading information
shiet.. the gig is over lads.. no more shitcoin PnD's
>>1672967
It's relatively easy to monitor /biz/. We have like 1/10 of the traffic of /pol/.
>>1672967
nah, for what, we are all anonymous
>>1672967
No they don't, why in the hell would you think that? You're acting as if SEC knows about 4chan and other similar sites like reddit, etc. Even if we did there is nothing wrong with that they're just trying to enforce the law.
Reported and saged.
Stupid questions get stupid answers.
>>1673106
This is a legitimate question
>>1672967
What would be the point? The SEC wants to monitor a handful of broke neckbeard virgins who speculate on meme coins and penny stocks? Don't flatter yourselves
>>1672967
Those lowlife cocksuckers are just like all other government boot licks. Fcc, dot, Oshawa, MSHA, etc... starts as a good idea and winds up being a circle jerky of restrictive cocksuckers.
Stupid mutherfuckers. Can't get rich because it's illegal for me to participate in private memorandums. Suck my 1 incheck dick sec!
>>1673337
>The SEC wants to monitor a handful of broke neckbeard virgins who speculate on meme coins and penny stocks?
>be SEC
>looking for criminals
>oh hey, these guys are doing crimes right out in the open!
>they're not big fish, but they're sure easy to catch!
I'm an SEC informant, and I read /biz/
>not even joking
>>1673127
there's no need to monitor it. just archive it and when shtf go back and dig up evidence.
>Material non public information.
>Made public.
>Still illegal.
>>1672991
try 1/100
>>1674413
>I'm an SEC informant
Really? I'm a NSA informant.
We should hang out.