Is it possible to make a company completely out of freelancers?
I.E. there are no bosses, just tasks that need to be done, and bounties/contracts to do them? Where structure is free to grow organically as successful workers subcontract others to increase their revenue and essentially make themselves managers and department heads?
I was thinking about how corporations are sort of communist dictatorships, and how market economies are so much more efficient, and wondered it if would be possible to make an actually capitalist organization.
>>1655970
Yeah, it's called a 1099-C and they suck shit to work for. Just look at any pyramid-scheme MLM bullshit. Have you never looked for work before or something?
>>1655970
Valve is a company that supposedly has no traditional management structure. You should check out what the employees say on Glassdoor it's pretty interesting--and it's not some shitty startup with no revenue, it's actually a behemoth in its industry
Does anyone know more about this?
Bosses and dynamic structures are not mutually exclusive. It makes sense to have someone in charge who keeps an overview and calls the shots and delegates the work. That doesn't mean that employees can't put in their own effort.
Can somebody explain the downsides to me?