Which line is better over time , financially ? A or B

C

Depends on the time scale.

If that's an entire lifetime, I'd choose b. Having money when you're young is nice, but having money when you're old is critical

File: 11666084_897158477040802_8268513719078555114_n.jpg (476KB, 1462x1678px) Image search: [Google]

476KB, 1462x1678px

>>1638990
A.
After 1/3 you quit and live off economic rents & interest on interest accumulation.

>>1638990
B, the max money goes on forever.

A, just dont be a retard and you can have more money than B

>>1638990
A

Enjoy the money early on and then jump off a skyscraper when you lose it all

$↑

>>1638990
A if you are wise in investing your money so you can pay for your medicine if you are old.

B if you are wise enough to know your would blow the money early on.

File: sellinvest.jpg (117KB, 1920x1548px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 1920x1548px

sell A and make some sensible investments for ~5% returns annualized

>>1638990
B.

for the time period shown the area under the curve of B is greater and therefore more overall wealth. the answer is also B on a longer time scale

>>1638990
Is this total money or some fixed income source?
If the former than obviously B. If the latter then A would allow you to make more money faster through wise investments.

>>1638990

This thread is retarded, illusion of choice.

>Which line is better over time financially?

Constantly hitting the intersection of A and B stabilized in perpetuity nullifying reciprocity between time and value, stable enough to hold value through inflation and downturns.

Wrap that, move on to the next.

>>1639193
>>1639081
>0 information about interest rates
>picks b

Retard alert

>>1638990
B