No really, what went wrong?

What?

>>1617086
You were conceived

>>1617086
People use it to trade and not to buy stuff. If peeps would buy a coffee once a week the price would stabilize and would be a viable option.

Anther problem is government regulating the crap out of it in states like New York and Commiefornia.

File: DumbNocoinersMissAnotherDip.png (100KB, 1671x843px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 1671x843px

>g-guys w-what w-went w-wrong? n-no o-one u-uses it j-just l-like g-gold s-so it's d-d-dead r-right g-guys?

>>1618303
>>g-guys w-what w-went w-wrong? n-no o-one u-uses it j-just l-like g-gold s-so it's d-d-dead r-right g-guys?

I just want it to slowly grow and not skyrocket, cuz when it skyrockets it usually plummets right back to 700

>>1618089

This. Bitcoin has basically become a gold alternative.

>>1617086

Faggot devs refusing to raise block size limit.

File: Trip1000HasBegun.png (114KB, 1468x836px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 1468x836px

>>1619321
>big blocker on suicide watch
Fucking lol

>USD
~99.999% of volume is used to buy and sell real goods and services or base the value of securities.

>BTC
~99.999% of volume is price speculation by NEETs.

For those of you saying BTC is like gold, you're right. BTC is just like gold in terms of the fact that it has no practical value as a medium of exchange, but gold has momentum and faggots around the world have been valuing it for millennia. BTC is to gold as altcoins are to BTC: worthless in comparison.

>>1619581
>worthless in comparison.

But not worthless.

>>1619581
grandpa misses the train again

>>1619541

So are you trying to imply that a price increase somehow solves the block size limit?

>>1620340
There is no "block size limit" problem.

Bitcoin soaring right now to $870 in India, $788 in China and $750 in US. China is using it to avoid capital controls, and India to flee the cash ban. Get in now or cry later.