Is Hillary the best thing that could happen for investment gains? Hear me out.
>Completely predictable in what her policies will be. Reduces volatility.
>Markets historically perform better under Democrats.
>Panders to socialist retards, but clearly favors Wall Street behind the scenes.
>Any tax increases she wants will be checked by a likely Republican House, and then GOP House and Senate after mid-terms in 2018.
Don't get me wrong, I know she's corrupt and I'm personally a Trump guy. Just trying to see this as a win-win situation and analyze what's best for investors since she will probably win.
Banks like her and vice versa, banks don't like bitcoin, so no
>>1605303
I'm talking about real investments here like dividend stocks and index funds. Not crypto-currency play money.
>>1605313
>dividend stocks and index funds
>real
>>1605242
I hope you sold what you have, because Trump is gonna win and the market will go down
>>1605322
I'm cool with it if he does, and I'm even voting for him. But let's be real here, Nate Silver only gives him a 30% chance, and that's the most generous model out there.
>>1605242
>OP now realizes why DOW jumped 300 points, NASDAQ jumped 120 points, and S&P500 jumped 40 points right after the FBI dropped their further email investigations
Hillary is more of the same Big Government, and Big Business likes that.
>>1605242
Trum wins, feds hike the interest and the bubble pops. Black monday all over again?
>>1605335
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2016/11/07/sp-500-indicator-trump-clinton_n_12842474.html
>>1605242
She would be, until she isn't. While these people will facilitate market inflation they also destroy price discovery and are turning the market into a one way Ponzi scheme detached from the real economy. Hillary would be great for established wealthy and insiders. Are you from one of those groups?
>>1605368
Yeah, it's true, but she's probably going to win. I just want to keep making money whoever gets in.
I think Trump would be better for markets and the country in the long run, but short-term would be chaos.
>>1605551
Forgot to say, Hillary is more of the same, but Wall Street loves that. So do my mutual funds as long as there's stable growth.
I really think we might finally see DOW 30K a few years into Hillary's Presidency. The economy has never been as good as it is right now for investors.
>Best election outcome for investors?
History says Democrats, by a wide margin.
>>1605562
Bill Clinton got out right before the dot com bubble and his policies created the housing bubble. I dont know if I agree more of that is good. and if the economy is about to pop with a trump election, how strong can we REALLY be? isn't it just "fake" good, until its unsustainable? Do you really think we can keep going? I'm wondering, seriously, Im not trying to sound condescending. I just dont see how we can keep doing what weve been doing
>look into this history of every fiat system throughout history
>spooped
>>1605242
WE HAVE FUCKING NEGATIVE INTEREST RATES IN THE DEVELOPED WORLD
HOW THE FUCK CAN ANYONE BELIVE THIS IS GOING TO END WELL????
SHIT'S FUCKED, SON
>Hear me out.
no reason to
the alternatives either:
1) caused the market to sink for over a week
2) thinks anyone participating in the stock market should be sent to a gulag
3) is a perpetually stoned moron