>>1488592
Looks like a Winking Harambe formation to me. I think it's going to swing around and go to the left.
>>1488601
This is a serious thread.
last red is the new ceiling.
will rise through that and have a breakthrough in another cycle.
too short of a time line to see. but it will platau and probably correct downwards before moving up higher than last peak in a year or so.
is this a tech/internet company?
they probably were in the red for a few years and just got in the black .
anything else?
>>1488592
down baby down to the ground
>TA
Literally put a gun in your mouth and end your life
it's the monero chart and it went down
buy blackcoin
>>1488592
Is that the infamous "smoking duck" pattern?
>>1488592
volume is insuffecient ta won't work.
>>1488630
can i borrow your gun pham?
>>1488592
statistically it's more likely to make a new high than a low
taking that, we would want to get in to make profit above the new high and a stop loss below the recent low
>>1488966
ok
so its like,raw internet tech....
but since its meme coin , then its probably gonna sit in the shitter for the majority of its lifetime, with random pumps inbetween till its eventually discontinued.
>>1488592
I think we have a support level at the 205, bringing down to the 99 and forward. A 7-9 on the left turn and a branch on the right 4-9. Consolidated, it's clear we have a double win-loss and a 3 strike upwards.
>>1488712
Statistically, it's more likely that you know nothing and nobody should listen to you.
tech analysis in a chart greater than intraday.... EWWWWWWWWW
>>1489010
statistically, 99 is closer to 100 than 90
>>1489015
Nigger what
>>1488608
'That was a serious post.
Don't overlook the significance of the Winking Harambe.
>>1488635
This.
Also your time frame is too short to apply TA.
>>1488592
>uses moving averages and a derivative of moving averages
>>1488592
Simple. However I don't ever use TA alone. That takes some serious autism.
That last taller red bar + (.25%) would be my stop loss and I would short the stock at current levels.
>not using mechanical analysis
Fucking plebs.
Holy fuck
...could it be?
>>1488592
Down, to the second highest dip.
>>1488592
>Cherry pick one chart with minimal information to "prove" TA doesn't work.
This isn't even bait. TA doesn't work 100% of the time, one chart means shit.