$100 - $100,000 by December

File: 1476298378921.png (245KB, 380x390px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 380x390px

>>1471295
>he wants to grow $100 to $100,000
>he wants this done by December

you understand if you accomplish this you will be one of the greatest traders that ever lived?

>>1471295
Sure anon, I will tell you a little secret. A few months ago, I bought a bunch of shares in an unknown stock with a tiny float. Fast forward to now, and I am starting to unload my shares to people just like you, desperate to get rich. So I tell you the ticker, and you go to your broker and buy my shares. Sound like a deal?

>>1471394
>one of
Name one person who has gotten better than 100,000% returns in under six months.

>>1471295
The only way this is remotely possible is through Trumpcoin.

Buy 100$ worth of Trumpcoin = 2000 Trumpcoin

Once Trump wins every trumpcoin becomes $50 meaning you earn $100.000 if you sell

>>1471407
It's only 1000% returns actually

>>1471409
>Once Trump wins every trumpcoin becomes $50
Where does that number come from?
Also why are Trump supporters so confident he'll win? I'd prefer him to Hillary myself but at this point I think even Johnson has better chances with moderates.

>>1471413
no...

$100k would be a gain of $990,000. Meaning a return of 99,990%.

>>1471413
No, it's 1000x returns.
1000 * 100% = 100,000%

>>1471420
But 100 000 / 100 is 1000

>>1471423
Yes, it is 1,000 times the starting capital. That doesn't mean 1,000%.

>>1471424
Then how do you write 1000 times

How do you figure it out?

>>1471429
this is like business 101

go to investopedia and figure it out young buck

>>1471420
You added an extra 0, it is a gain of 99,900 not 990,000

the roi would be 999%, which would be ~ 1,000% returns, which is what this anon. is saying >>1471423

You could do this with next level shilling techniques. Idk if this applies in modern times, but there was a guy at 17 who became a millionaire through shilling stocks on a website during the late 90's early 2000's

>>1471435
Link to page
because I don't see how it isn't 1000% returns

>>1471436
Jonathan Lebed

great story.

>>1471409
Do you have any proof behind the if trump wins = 50$? Im trying to find the source myself but google isnt bringing up anything

>>1471438
1000% is 10x returns because, 100% is base. 200% is double, 300% is triple etc.
So 1000% is 10x.

100 to 100,000 is 1000x which = 100,000%

>>1471436
You cannot actually be stupid enough to think that increasing 1000x is the same as increasing 1000%.
1000% is 10x.

>>1471436
>but there was a guy at 17 who became a millionaire through shilling stocks on a website
He was using multiple accounts to shill.
The best part was that the SEC came after him, but couldn't prove he was doing anything that much different than the Wall Street analysts (they tried to say it was "fraud", though).
They only recovered a small percentage of the money, and he kept the rest.

>>1471295
>>1471394
>>1471407
>>1471409
>>1471413
>>1471420
>>1471421
>>1471423
>>1471424
>>1471429
>>1471436
>>1471438
>>1471448
>>1471465
Welcome to whose /biz/ is it anyway, where the maths is retarded and the posts dont count

There are at least 3 projects in crypto that went 1000% this year

>>1471618
>the posts dont count
>not the posters don't count
You fucked up

>>1471506
No, they could prove everything and he lost all his money. You are delusional...

File: biz-does-maths.png (122KB, 906x493px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 906x493px

>>1471413
>>1471420
>>1471421
>>1471423
>>1471429

will /biz/ ever solve this paradox

>>1472926
this is totally possible. buy BTC when it was 1 a cent. Buy eth when it was a cent. but monero when it was a cent. millions of dollars guaranteed.

I was too late into 1cent BTC, but made handsome profits off ETH, ETC and XMR

File: Screen Shot 2016-08-30 at 10.19.30 AM.png (69KB, 2578x98px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 2578x98px

>>1472125
>You are delusional...
Lol, ok.