>protip: you can't
>>1405560
Prove usury is wrong and should be outlawed. Protip - you cant
>>1405565
>implying
>>1405560
>usury
Depends on your definition.
Loan shark/vig type stuff?
Or idiots losing money on triple inverse funds because they don't know the mechanics of "inverse", "triple", or "the stock market"?
>>1405575
Not an argument.
You're not doing very well at this
>>1405576
The shit that lets kikes turbo-jew the white man.
>>1405588
ayy check em