Told you to buy Nintendo before Pokemon Go

>>1370003
Well you were right but imagine if you were wrong? It could have been a flop and still might be a flop. I played it and honestly its not even a pokemon game. You mostly go around and throw balls at pictures of pokemon. The series was about strategy and this is a super casual game which cant be possibly interesting for very long. The game element is too small. Wait until the hype is over and lets talk about nintendo stock in 3 months.

>>1370003

If you can afford to buy in Nintendo I don't think it's a bad option in the long haul. Potential to make a lot of money if the NX does well.

>>1370045
that's a pretty huge if

>>1370047

Oh most definitely. That's why I find it funny that this is even a thread. I doubt the average person; even the top 1% of people on /biz/ could afford one let alone multiple shares of a 15k stock.

>>1370027
It kills black people.

>>1370076
it costs like $200. pricey, yes, but not as expensive as you're trying to make it out to be.

>>1370003
>8%
Well whoop Dee freaking Doo, it moved up a bit.

Meanwhile, I'm betting the Nikkei will retest 15000 soon

>>1370076
That's in yen...

http://metro.co.uk/2016/07/08/pokemon-go-player-finds-dead-body-while-looking-for-pokemon-5995779/

>kek

>>1370076
it is about $16 a share. and you could just buy $100 worth if you wanted and have made $8 profit (before and fees)