MFW I realize Trumpcoin is a scam.

you will never go to the moon, with a mentality like that

>>1313391
A scam would mean something was misrepresented to you.

The Dev has never sold Trump as anything other than what it is. A coin using trumps name because he likes Trump.

If you think its anything else, its your own fault.

I hold more Trumps than the Dev does. I paid $100 dollars for them.

>>1313391
how is it a scam? Not only do you get the coins, but you also will get trump eth. Like holy fuck you are dumb

File: Exactly one fuck.jpg (17KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 320x240px

mfw coinfags realize they are bagholders

COCK

File: large.jpg (12KB, 380x265px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 380x265px

>>1313391
>mfw I sold at 7k

It's not a scam, it's just a shitcoin.

I've said time and time and time and time again that if the devs are going to use Trump's name (AND BRAND, HIS FUCKING NAME IS HIS BRAND) without his permission, they are just asking to get sued.

Remember what happened to Coinye?

Let me guess, the price just crashed?

File: meh.ro3497.jpg (27KB, 430x394px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 430x394px

>>1313543

Yes, bagholders is accurate. Its not necessarily a bad thing. Crypto buyers are betting on the competency of developers to increase the value of their bags.

Embracing this role and trying to be the best possible "developer competency" speculator is the surest way to make money in this industry, and at the same time it benefits the whole cryptocurrency community to reward the most competent developers. It's the people who dont speculate and instead just buy pump and dump coins that get rekt.

File: biz.jpg (442KB, 1246x796px) Image search: [Google]

442KB, 1246x796px

/biz/coin is best coin

>>1313496
I agree with the first part but you literally cannot know how much the dev holds.