Is a wsj sub a good investment?

paying for yesterdays news in advance.

The best news source is the market itself. once you've got decent filters in place the news hits you.

>>1239325
Elaborate

Not really

WSJ is nothing more than left wing opinion pieces now and yesterday's news.

You're not going to get anything useful out of it and there are plenty of free sources that report on the dame things.

It's entertainment, not education

>>1239341
What are these other sources?

>>1239343

Google

>>1239385
Helpful advice, much appreciated

>>1239389

:^)

woooooorldsssstaaaaaaaar journal

File: OP on the loose.jpg (68KB, 732x608px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 732x608px

>>1239319

What kind of returns do you expect?

File: Literally 25+ just the facts mam stories a minute.png (298KB, 1842x995px) Image search: [Google]

298KB, 1842x995px

>>1239340
download think or swim free
watch the prices with occasional 10 minute delays.
or pay $10 to WSJ to read. Big move yesterday in XXX and ABC some people made a lot of money.

>>1239648
>he thinks people read WSJ for market/stock news.

File: 1445398391789.jpg (77KB, 316x309px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 316x309px

WSJ is only necessary for people who work in high finance.

Because it provides market news and information vital to success?

No, its the exact same news as anywhere else. Its necessary because your colleagues and clients will be reading it to "play the part of the Wall Street guy" and they will expect you to be reading the editorials on irrelevant happenings in certain industries. It is a defense tool to keep your image up.