>Gender equality in the workplace could add $4.3 trillion

Oh vey not enough people working! Gender equality!

It won't and they know it. Women are stupid and useless. The only job they will ever be good at is whoring.

>>1181971
Who the hell wrote this garbage. We already have too many workers in the economy and to much laziness from people being enabled disproportionately.

>>1181971
Gender equality is a thing. Forcing the same amount of women in as men just puts shittier employees on the line and forces out more qualified male applicants.

>>1181971
First, women are useless
Second, nigger wages are already decreasing in real terms, we don't need the labour market to be more competitive
Third, women should be at home raising their kids so we don't end up with generations of mentally fucked people

Pure propaganda for big business and co. Reminder that it used to be perfectly feasible to raise a family of 6 on -one- blue collar income.

>>1181973

>>>/pol/

>>1181976

>>>/r9k/

>>1181993

>>>/pol/
>>>/r9k/
>>>/p/rofessionalpsychiatrictreatment

>>1181993
Says the raging homosex.

>>1182005
>>>reddit

>>1182005

>>>/safespace/

>>1182005
>>>/r/eddit
>>>/s/alon
>>>/t/umblr

>>1181971
First of all, gender inequilty is a myth.

Second, yea ofcourse, I can probably guess how this research went.

> hur if we raise all the salarys of womyn the global economy will go up because there is more moneyz, im woman im smart.

Then just raise all the salary 10x !!!
It will increase global economy 10x too !!!!111

>>1182005
>>1182010
Roasties detected
>>>/cuntflaps/

>>1182041
This.

Also I would really like the know how these people propose to force women to get high skill, high paying jobs. Any gender inequality at this point is due to simple choice so what are they planning on doing? Banning women from taking art history and women's studies degrees and forcing them into stem? Make being a housewife illegal?

>>1182054
>what are they planning on doing?
Fine and tax anyone who doesn't adhere to some random quotas.

>>1182056
Why is this tyranny allowed?

>>1182064
Because it will clearly add trillions to the economy

>>1182070
>add trillions to the economy
make the rich richer and keep the poor poor*

"If we hired every woman in the world, it would boost the economy!"

Shocking - call the Nobel people, looks like we have a wiener.

File: who cares.jpg (23KB, 446x336px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 446x336px

>>1181971
>Thoughts on this, lads?
clearly none in the report
>giving people more money would mean we have more money!

>>1181971
it'll add more money to the economy because women spend their money on stupid shit the moment they get it.

Where are these jobs supposed to come from? Wouldn't the economy improve just as much if they gave men the proposed 6.4 million new jobs?

>>1181993
>Reminder that it used to be perfectly feasible to raise a family of 6 on -one- blue collar income.

What happen?

>>1181971

I don't understand this. They're talking about the huge benefits of adding more women to the workforce but they're saying we need an additional 6.4 million jobs.

>>1181973
>>It found $2.1 trillion could be added if the country raised its female employment ratio from 64% to 74%.

why would it matter if the new hires were male or female?

>>1182750
meant to quote op woops

>>1182005
fuck outta here lmaoo

when will this myth stop existing
anyone who actually looks at the numbers knows it doesn't exist.

>>1181971

> less moms at home
> more daycare expenses
> more shithead kids cause mommy issues
> more people working, more cash flow
> more cash flow, higher prices
> more job competition

Welp

>>1182453

Higher prices though.

>>1181993
> women are useless
> stay at home to raise kids

Pick one.

>>1182724
Stigmatization of house wives essentially doubled the workforce in the past few decades, as has outsourcing for jobs that can be done with a telecommute and outright removal of jobs to other countries for things that are best done with more lax safety regulations.

>Raise minimum wage!
>But that's less jobs and still a minimum, which everyone will adjust for.
>Economy adjusts, less people have jobs, my Subway sandwiches went from $5 to $6.50 overnight in CA, can't even imagine NY.

>Adding more jobs and sticking women in those jobs means more money!
>The economy is going to catch up again, and printing more money for these harpies is going to put us further down the rabbit hole. Adjustment is right around the corner.
>N-Nuh uh...

Can we just bomb SanFran, Seattle and NY?

>>1182072
This will make entrepreneurs, business owners, and any company go broke by hiring on more people and fucking over everyone. They already hire the amount needed for the workforce, putting more people out there won't help.

>>1182991
I wish, familia

>>1181971
bitches better get deir ass on da street and earn ma money!

>>1182750
This has nothing to do with logic.

This is how they intend to push some new fucked up law penalizing people who do not tow their line of horseshit.

They don't actually give a fuck about reality. They just want to whip up a mob of angry idiots who they can use to push themselves into positions of power and wealth. Convincing a bunch of idiotic women their being discriminated against (here it's not even if, it's implied there is a status quo of gender inequality against women right now which needs addressing) they can make enough noise to scare politicians and businesses into caving to whatever demands they want.

It's the same basic tactic that drives the black lives matter movements and as a /biz/nessmen I would have expected you all to know this. This strategy is as old as the Romans and has worked many times.

If any of you can pull it off you can weasel your way to wealth and power on the backs of the stupid and naive.

>>1182724
Jews bought up all the real estate

>That would require businesses and local governments to invest $475 billion.
Invest in what? Diversity training classes? Get fucked feminist cunts.

>>1181971
>4.3 trillion added to the economy over 9 years
>government would have to invest 475 billion annually
>475 billion x 9 years = 4.275 or 4.3billion

>if we give x amount of money to women it will add x amount of money to the economy because women dont know how to save money

File: women's lib.png (514KB, 1344x3216px) Image search: [Google]

514KB, 1344x3216px

that's the plan family units had a nice thing going for them with stay at home wives that are untaxable, so you have to dump women into the workforce so you can tithe them and use them to bid against men. so more workers drive wages down and the upper skim that off the top I wonder who is behind this

>>1181971
It probably assumes they receive a 25% increase in wages or however much they think women make less than men with no other changes. Honestly delete this thread because that "information" is garbage

>>1183235
Likely true but many of those citations are shit

>>1182030
>>1182034
>>1182035
>>1182876
>>1182049
What are you guys doing here?

>>1183275
Actually the real plan is to breed out white people and replace them with shitskins.

>>1183302
>What are you guys doing here?
Why aren't you in the kitchen?

File: 1452751996049.jpg (115KB, 648x795px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 648x795px

>>1183302
Posting shit, how bout you?

>>1183014

So then the question is: how can the strategy be beaten?

What if everyone on /biz/ starts pretending to be retarded?

Stupid people are bound to start disagreeing with us if we act retarded enough. It might turn the mob back in the other direction.

>>1183324
HA it ain't gonna take a whole lotta acting.

>>1183314
So this is but a means the most tacit form of depopulation

File: maxresdefault.jpg (43KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 960x540px

>>1183324
>/biz/
>"""""pretending""""" to be retarded
>implying this board will decrease in population if a larger percent """acts""" retarded
>implying retards don't follow retards

>>1183302
I think the better question is what the fuck are YOU doing here