Lawyers please

>>1144835
>says it's not the best board to post it here
>insults us openly
>asks for professional favours without compensation
>posts absolutely nothing of interest
>asks for personal information

yeah, no. get fucked

>>1144842
>insults us
Why so defensive? Are you one of the idiots?

>>1144835
____****KEK****____

>>1144835
Sounds like a case for a proffessional auditor. You could find some cheesedick accounting students to quote you, but generally youll be paying a lump sum to get what it spunds like you want.

>>1144842
not the best, but presumably the best on 4chan.

did not insult anyone directly, the fact that you take 'decrease in intelligence' as an insult, virtually implies that you are whom I was referring to.

Compensation is rather evident, no? I have money but simply want someone passionate and knowledgeable, not someone who's first question is what's my share. (you retard)

Obviously I don't post anything of interest. Could be held against me in the future, and I can imagine a couple dozen other scenaria where it's in my best interest no to share with people like you.

if you consider an e-mail personal information, then yeah; you are right. good job, 1 out of 5. 'get fucked'? how is life on the bottom side of the ladder? fucked right? I wouldn't know. yeah, no.

>>1144835
What sort of industry is the company in?

>>1144857
gambling - honestly, I think gambling has exploded over the last 5-10 years and believe it's just a matter of time before it implodes

like if you've ever read the terms & conditions of these companies, spoken to the support people in chat behind the screen whom i presume to be liable, and thought about the industry, economic disadvantages for poor/middle classes, i'm quite surprised it is becoming increasingly legal. bubble. unsustainable. you cannot all be ethereum and stock dilettantes, right? i know there is a case to be made, i don't know how to financially benefit but I know there is a way.

I'm intrigued - lawyer here. What's your connection to it? What's the most egregious thing you know of? If you want to make money your only real option is to be the plaintiff in the lawsuit. No ones going to give you a share to partner with them etc it's not ethical.

>>1144894
To be honest, I know virtually nothing about law at all. I realised numerous things went wrong legally today when I used that particular gambling website, spoke to its representatives, and especially when I read the terms and conditions, promotion terms, and privacy statement. Sure, it may not be easy to prove, but I'm sure it is plausable. The whole industry is corrupt, and it is only a matter of time before someone is able to prove this and go around the terms & conditions etc which prevents that someone from doing so. I'm currently going over the above relating to one website and already I can only conclude that there are so many items in the t&a, privacy statement & promo terms that contradict. I don't know if I should focus on a particular company, on a national commission, or a whole industry, but I do know that there are too many things going wrong, bended, for it to be sustainable. For example one of the bonuses is mathematically worse than without. It may be insignificant, but I'm confident there are numerous similar and supposedly worse examples. I know virtually nothing about law but all I can think of when I summarise these documents is that a jury would undoubtedly take my side. I don't know how much it would cost to sue any one of these bodies or whether or not there is a financial gain, which is why I posted this. If I already found 10-15 things on the above documents relating to one website, it frightens me to imagine what I, or a team, could find in a whole industry. I don't even have any witnesses or stories that back me up, but I already know it has potential.

Just looking for someone who could answer some of my questions as to whether or not it could be viable, considered as evidence, etc.

No strings attached...

>>1144861

OP I was gonna tell you to just pick up the phone and call some local lawyers but then I read this post.

No reason to go after a gambling site.

The justice system in general does not give a single fuck about gamblers rights. And even if they did, they are more interested in shutting down online gambling than helping the people that use the sites.

Remember when Bodog got shut down? The people with their money in there lost everything.

>>1145011
I have literally no money deposited on gambling sites whatsoever. That doesn't change the fact that the whole industry is corrupt, arguably and partly illegal, and amoral. The aim would be to indeed shut down those sites and perhaps settle before.

We all know the equality gap between the rich and the poor is increasing more than ever. Sure, there are plenty of reasons for this, one of them being gambling. The rich don't go gambling, they acknowledge the fact that it is a loss of money. Even when they do go gambling and spend a hundred times the amount of money someone poor spends, comparatively it's not a significant chunk of their budget. The poor however do lose a lot, too much money on gambling, the lottery, ... Honestly, all the lottery does to a greater extent than gambling is take a couple hundred from the poor and give it to a dozen people over the course of year, robin hood in our capitalist world. Thus, it's not the intelligent people who visit casino websites on a daily basis, it's the poor and stupid ones. Gambling operators obviously are aware of this and exploit this fact. The industry is becoming saturated and too corrupt, unsustainable. Anyone who has a history of gambling, positive or negative, who reads through the terms and conditions can acknowledge the wrongdoing by these companies. Look at the pressure on Google and Facebook in terms of the amount of taxes they pay, it's so relative yet irrelative in comparison to these gambling companies. The lottery is no longer a company controlled by governments, the privatisation of the industry will backfire and it will backfire hard. I wouldn't be surprised if gambling, casino's, sportsbetting, would be virtually illegal 10 years from today.

>>1145048
>I'm not affected or personally involved in anyway but I want to take other people's fun away because vague communist reasons.
Kill yourself

>>1145011

Not sure as to how the justice system and different courts work exactly but if I could get some of these companies to trial, get them on the stand along with middle class people who lost their savings because of these companies (and themselves primarily), any jury will recognize how corrupt they truly are as well as the negative impact on the lower and middle classes. But yeah, like you said, not too many people care about gamblers rights. why? because it's like fucking prosititutes basically, not acceptable. I'm 20 years old and started betting on football (soccer) when I was 15, till I was 18 or so. When I was 18, more than half of the guys I knew got into it. There were groups on facebook with more than 10,000 people exchanging ideas and opinions. This industry is a dark one, it destroys people at the benefit of the few. As a result of this change (i'm a capitalist by heart,) companies reacted with what we witness today. It looks like consumers are given a fair chance of winning; but whereas in a casino you might lose 2% of whatever you bet in the long run, online that percentage is a lot lot higher. Read through a gambling company's terms etc, preferably after smoking a j. You'll realize how corrupt they are in their words, actions, and ideology. It's the kind of issue that draws media attention, parents, and money. That's all you need. I want to sue a thousand companies; settle with all of them, and change the industry forever.

>>1145048
>I wouldn't be surprised if gambling, casino's, sportsbetting, would be virtually illegal 10 years from today.
Solid protection.

And while we're at it, let's ban alcohol again and make premarital sex a felony. I feel like these goals could be accomplished in the next twenty years.

>>1145061
I actually agree. Cannabis will shift to being legal while alcohol undergoes the opposite; it would be logical to occur simultaneously after the current wave of feminism.

Premarital sex I'm not sure, haven't given it a lot of thought but the fact that humans have sex at a younger and younger age can't be reversed easily I think

>>1145073
You're either painfully stupid, or one of the top ten most autistic people on 4chan tonight.

>>1145060
Seriously, are you upset that people lose money gambling? That's how it's supposed to work. Also, you can't sue these companies. I mean, you can, but you won't win. Those documents you've been reading are put together by competent lawyers. Teams of them, even. You also can't bring suit because there are no damages against you. This is literally you thinking you've found a get rich quick scheme by attacking a bogeyman. You're no better than the casino itself.

File: smirks.jpg (9KB, 205x205px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 205x205px

>>1145060
>Read through a gambling company's terms etc, preferably after smoking a j.

>>1145087
why is that my dear friend

At first I thought OP realized Fanduel and DraftKings were holding illegally low amounts of cash relative to customers' paper accounts, ala Fulltilt. Now I see he's just a door-to-door Mormon on steroids. Either way kill yourself OP

>>1145126
>>1145087
Truly sad how biz has developed over the years into 'go kill yourself'. Would that satisfy you? I can only assume so since I cannot possibly imagine another motive aside from augmenting your personal feelings in your presumably miserable life?

Anyways,
>>1145087
Sure, I might be autistic, I'm not sure. I'm a mutation of a sociopath and psychopath though, infused with autism according to you, definitely OCD and perhaps some schizophrenia. The fuck do I care; it allows me to get any girl I want and it is quite a good feeling knowing you'll be extremely successful later.

>Those documents you've been reading are put together by competent lawyers

Apparently not sufficiently competent since me, who barely knows anything about law (in comparison to you guys everything,) can pinpoint a dozen holes after reading it twice. I'm not sure how to explain this; thinking outside the box is simply not for everyone.

>I mean, you can, but you won't win.
Is what every loser said since....

Oh and thank you for enlightening me, I didn't know gambling was supposed to make people lose money.

Everybody knows gambling makes you lose money. But hardly anyone knows that instead of -2 or -3% ROI we are looking at -10 or more, combined with the fact that providers obviously find more and more ways of increasing this percentage without changing the games they offer. Duh.

>You also can't bring suit because there are no damages against you. This is literally you thinking you've found a get rich quick scheme by attacking a bogeyman. You're no better than the casino itself.

Damages against me is not mandatory. Saying that basically implies I'm talking to.. I don't know, can't come up with a word that would do you justice. A get rich quick scheme? There's no such thing. I would know. I'm rich. Because of my parents, sure. I don't care, I'm rich now and will be the richest in the future.

>>1145087
Just hit myself in the face because I wasted minutes replying to someone like you. Ugh, not sure if that's autism, OCD, or both. Guess you would know.

>>1145147
Let's ignore your painfully thick autism for one moment...

Since you're so smart, explain to us the grounds of your supposed lawsuit and why these gambling websites owe you money

>>1145153
Please don't change my words. I never said I was smart, I just said that you are stupid.

Although you are essentially asking the same question I was initially, and I am still figuring out how to accomplish that, I wouldn't directly attack the gambling corporations, comfortably nested in their safe haven anyway.

I would put pressure on the institutions, perhaps fight them in court (UK, USA, EU, ...), but ultimately, what is most valuable to these companies is their license. They don't care about third or even second world countries, they care about the above. So I would put pressure on the commissions and media by explaining why gambling is such a negative thing on a macro scale as well as for individuals, while exploiting the gaps in these companies' policies. Because, trust me, there are more than you would think. Without thinking, I remember at least 10 stories or anecdotes from friends or people I know whom were wronged by these companies. So, I guess I would either go after one of the biggest ones in the industry, leave a mark, settle for couple tens of millions, but that does not seem too viable. Instead, I guess it would be better to directly approach the commission in an effort of banning specific companies from any given country or region, but prior to proposing my research and analysis I would walk in the headquarters, straight to the CEO, drop the booklet on his desk, look him straight in the eyes, and walk away. Then I would wait for the call where he proposes me to settle.

Wishful thinking? Maybe. But everything worth thinking about is wishful

>>1145177
you were* I guess, English is my third language; pardon me

>>1145179
not that ur not stupid anymore tho, don't get me wrong

>>1145177
Idiots lose money gambling. And alcohol has killed drunks. And guns aid in suicide. Indiscriminate sex leads to STDs. And drugs ruin lives. Hell, the stock market has wiped out 401ks and college funds.Put on your bigboy pants, bubble boy. Not all of us want Mommy and Daddy government making sure we dont get a boo boo. Learn to appreciate life's vices in extremely small doses

>>1145210
Don't you dare call me bubble boy. You have no idea what or who I am. I've lost money gambling. Today, yesterday. I've been drunk the majority of time for the past month. I've had a two week long fear of having aids, fear was not without reason. And I've been doing drugs daily for the past year or two. But yeah, I'm too strong to consider suicide, and too smart too witness my stocks go down. Nevertheless, I'm no bubble boy and you have absolutely no idea who my parents are, how they educate me, and how many of my mistakes they've had to deal with.

Please apprise me as to how you derived from whatever I said that I should "put on my bigboy pants"? I'm not familiar with the word empathy but let me help you by saying that the number one token of ignorance & stupidity is judging people without knowing who they are. What allows you to talk to me like that? How come you are feeling superior? What did you achieve in life? Or did you just vote today for Sanders; you are probably crying now because you realised your stupidity and laziness won't be helped? Those last two sentences relate to you, stating things on the assumptions of the unknown, bad habit. Habits of the lower classes. Theres nothing I can say to you that will help you or make you see light and/or purpose. But please, "appreciate life's vices in extremely small doses"? That's is not how you achieve great things in life. In contrary, that's how you become you.

>>1144835
I swear half this board is just autists like op role playing. Your first thought was to come to biz? Kek, yeah ok op.

>>1145240
always good to consider all possible angles

>>1144835
do you have a legitimate interest in taking action against that co?

>>1145463
Yes. It's just that I'm not sure what to focus on in my research, I don't know what's proof and what is not. I don't know what is valid and what is not. I need someone to take the rudder while I hold the sails

>>1145463
I feel like something needs to happen, one company needs to make a mistake and someone must exploit this, the ball will start rolling after leading to a gambling demise (to some extent)

>>1145463
like the world is getting angry as f*ck because google and others don't pay their taxes the way they should. those golden days are basically over for them and I guess a good start would be gambling because that is something the people will support even more than an increase in taxes for google.

Op is a homosexual bum botherer.

>>1145477
OP has no idea what that means.

>>1145233
Lmao pathetic

>>1145048
>>1145060

So, in a nutshell you just hate gambling?

Good luck fighting that battle.

Gambling is fine if you just do it for fun and not to make money. The people who gamble to make money cannot be saved.