GERMANY NEEDS REFUGEES

So you guys finally got it? Good.

Nice try Angela.

The only things this islamic vermin will increase is crime rate a welfare cost.

>>1133802
A lot (not all, but a lot) of Syrian refugees are basically little Tsarnaev brothers - terrorists who were defeated by the rightful government of President Assad (elected with 83% of the vote, check wikipedia) and are now fleeing to Europe to save their sorry asses. New Year in Cologne is nothing compared for whats to come - expect a few Bostons. US took in Tsarnaevs because they were just "poor oppressed chechniens", and how did they pay the US back? Same thing is gonna happen in Europe.

If anything, the right strategy is to rent islands from Greece, put refugees in camps on those islands (by camps I mean well maintained, safe camps, where people are well fed, not what Germans did to Jews in WW2), and return them to Syria when President Assad can secure the whole country once again.

>>1133823
I know many refugees personally and they are skilled, intelligent, nice people. Not all of them are rapists, you know?

They will, of course, improve economics in Germany.

Why do you think politicians let them in? Because they are such nice people and just want to help? Kek.

>>1133802
Refugees are good for business.

I've employed a few.

I like overcrowded and dynamic places. I hope london becomes like the city in bladerunner. We need to be letting in absolutely anybody. Get them all working and producing not living in slums. Generate wealth and a thriving economy.

If we start letting in all the refugees and people from all over the world, chinese, indians, mexicans and then relax a load of economic regulations. I can guarantee the economy will go absolutely gangbusters and the chicoms will be left in the dust.

Unfortunately the rest of the population does not share my vision.

>>1133802
Just more people to push the unit labor cost to the ground. More people struggeling about the same workplace leads to lower wages

>>1133845
Explain how that is a bad thing?

Who cares if wages are low when you can get chicken and chips for £2 and commute from ilford all week for £15 from your £250/month shared accomodation. And putlocker is free. These wageslaves have it too good imo.

>>1133830
> here listen to my anecdote, nevermind actual statistics about muslim and nigger immigrants regarding crimerates, welfare, sharia law etc
> also, nothing politicians ever decided has gone wrong, look at the history :^)

>>1133802
Bilderberg pls go

Why do white nations need non-white immigrants when they could just have a government subsidy for having children?

This is how you know you've been lied to and the goal is the extinction of the white race.

>>1133855
yougottabekiddingme.png

>>1133833
It's all fun and games until they become a majority and elect to instate Sharia, outlaw film and music and alcohol and internet, and sentence all whites and non-Muslims to death by stoning.

>>1133833
Good post.

So Germany actually needs immigrants.

Have fun explaining this to underage racist kids on /pol/.

I hate most sandniggers myself but we shouldn't be delusional.

>>1133863
>Why do white nations need non-white immigrants when they could just have a government subsidy for having children?
For example...?

>>1133855
Cheaper wages are positive for a business if it keeps the prices of their products in the first round.
In the second round this will lead to an economic crisis, because if no one has money anymore, the bulk sale is only possible by making consume debts, which is a finite process. (We are already in the second round by the way)

>>1133887
What are competitive exports?

British people dont buy anytjing except alcoholic beverages and home improvements. They don't even eat out most of the time. Most of england is boring as fuck and full of retired people.

>>1133802
Refugees are nothing but a question of compassion/wanting to help people. They are mostly unemployable and will be a net drain on society for a really long time, if not forever. People talking about "muh aging society" basically do it to find something positive about a bad situation, almost everyone knows we are not benefitting from refugees.

If the question was to actually boost our economy we would have immigration-laws so that people can apply in their homecountry and we check beforehand if they will be able to find a job/apprenticeship here. I actually like that idea and think we should implement something like that.

>>1133833

Post proof.

Also how do you explain the giant foreigner unemployment in Germany and the fact that they all get welfare?

>>1133884
>>1133863
Hello? Waiting for a good example.

Or are you just shitposting because nothing to do?

Germany needs immigrants.

>>1133908

Why does it need immigrants and why do they have to be less intelligent and educated migrants that not only don't work but can't?

>>1133863
You know why and whose behind it ;)

>>1133908
No, it needs a higher birthrate. Immigrants are only one way to achieve that.

>>1133884
For example:

Have ____ children under 18, get ____ dollars each year from the government.

>>1133918

Does it really need that considering how close we are to automation?

>>1133918
And therefore we need immigrants.

>>1133896
Look at the relation between Germany and the USA. Germany exports a huge load of cars and stuff, the USA takes it on credit. This means that Germany will never get something worthy back. Same thing with Greece and some other countries with a negative foreign trade balance

>>1133926

No your logic is retarded to say the least. It's one of the solutions yet you think it's the only ones. Yet is it even a problem?

Also why Refugees?

They are bringing more crime than europeans, they refuse to work and they drain welfare.

We don't owe the refugees anything, and yet we are feeding them like their genes are something to preserve when Whites are an endangered species.

They are weeds.

>>1133926
No. Germans could also just have more children.
>>1133923
That's assuming automation can continue filling up the gap in labour. As the amount of workers drops, so does the amount of people available to develop the machines needed automation, while the automation needed grows larger..

>>1133905
Too much regulation and taxation is preventing people from employing these refugees productively.

>>1133934
Because refugees want to come to Germany. You can't force Italian people, French people or whatever to come to Germany, you know?

>>1133936
>No. Germans could also just have more children.
Birthrates are generally sinking among whites, though, children are expensive and stressful, you can't force people to make children.

>>1133938

How?

One would imagine the current German government even incentivizing if not forcing people to hire them.

>>1133877
sure, my father always employed illegal albanians , then called the police on them when it was their time to get paid and got them deported.
the problem becomes when they actually want to stay and leech of wellfare

>>1133940

You have Polish, Romanian, Ukranian... Eastern Europe.

That want to get there and I know for a fact it's hard for them to go to Germany and prefer Portugal and Spain or UK.

Also Germany is not accepting any Ukranians, surely 1-2 million Ukranians would be a safer and over all smarter choice over Syrians and other migrants.

File: refugeesfromsyria.jpg (548KB, 1920x1085px) Image search: [Google]

548KB, 1920x1085px

Illiterate rapists and jihadis with a 75% unemployment rate are great for the economy.

>starving refugees 8.jpg
Yeah shit troll, fuck off.

>>1133940
>Birthrates are generally sinking among whites, though

Yes, but that's a reversible process.

>children are expensive and stressful
Not necessarily, good pre-schools, daycares and child subsidies all make it easier for people to have children.

>you can't force people to make children.
No, but you can make it easier for people to have them, which increases birthrates.

>>1133949
It's not hard for ANYONE to get into Germany, why would it be? We have open borders, or had. I know countless poor Polish people that made their way into Germany.

>>1133955
>No, but you can make it easier for people to have them, which increases birthrates.
Yeah then make GOOD examples how and back them up.

You can't.

Cool.

>>1133956

I know a lot of Romanians who say Germans just won't hire them and that it's a bitch living there so they prefer to go work in the UK or Italy or Iberian states.

Plus you have not countered my point about Ukrainian refugees.

>>1133958
By changing your name to Mohammed.

>>1133958
>Yeah then make GOOD examples how and back them up.

> good pre-schools, daycares and child subsidies all make it easier for people to have children.

Read my post first before making such accusations, friend.

>>1133877
Increased rapes and crime, wuds up wit dat?

>>1133958

Israel had a similar problem.

And they did what the other anon said.

They gave tax exceptions, financial aid and promoted the ever living shit out of marriage and childbearing and their problem fix it's self in a relatively short period.

>>1133942
Probably not.

The refugees are probably banned from working.

>>1133802

This isn't /pol/ or /int/, you fuck. Go Away.

>>1133965
Germany has all this this, America does too.

Children are still expensive (what you listed costs money) and stressful.

Countries have all this but birthrates still go down.

We need immigrants. Period.

/thread

>>1133981
you are stupid.
get cucked by a sandnigger

>>1133981
>America
>good preschools
Kek
Also, America's whites have a much higher birthrate than Germany's. My country saw a spike in birthrates as well after such reforms were put into action. The truth is Germans are just too lazy to have children, and work to provide for them. Germans have lost their old vigor and industriousness and succumbed to the trhoes of lethargy, unlike Iceland and the U.S.A.

>>1133981
>i only care about money and don't give to shits what happens to my country and my family after i die
cool dude

>>1133962
where are you from

Why would European countries allow refugees? Just to boost agregate GDP? Because these refugees will bring down per capita GDP. Better to have high skill jobs(high value added) than low skill jobs.

>>1133999
To pander to socialists who think borders are evil and oppressive and that everyone is entitled to their countrymen's hard labour.

>>1133962
Because you still didn't explain how Germany doesn't let Ukrainians in. What makes you believe Germany doesn't welcome certain people?

Everyone can get into Germany.

>>1133802
>/biz/ is falling for this
I'd understand this if we were to turn them into slaves. But you people are giving them your country and your females. Enjoy paying for your wife's son while she gets the delicious coal into her :^)

>>1133802
I would agree if it were anything other than savage muslims. Even moderate muzzies would be cool. These idiots are importing muslims from a war torn shit hole known for terrorism and they have no clue who's coming in.

It's a dangerous game. They could import Indians ffs if they need workers.

>>1133877
You realize he's advocating for slave labor right? He literally said to cut regulation.

Libcucks are fucking way more evil than capitalists.

File: Screen Shot 2016-03-08 at 8.19.47 PM.png (160KB, 334x487px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 334x487px

>>1133802

The question the libertarians and open-borders big business boys forget is *why* are German birthrates so low?

And, if these refugees are going to integrate so perfectly, how are we going to prevent *their* birthrate from tanking a couple generations later?

It's stupid. Your immigration plan is unsustainable, unless your idea is to import people forever, creating a state that burns up the best and brightest of humanity -- working them hard and their genes dying from lack of reproduction

Good gene, high IQ, hard-working populations are a resource to be preserved, not mixed away in a stupid libertarian consumerist nightmare.

Fix the German birthrate problem be incentivizing parenthood for the middle and upper classes. Paid maternity leave, tax cuts that apply to high tax payers, better school options for the rich. This is the way to make your economy strong in the long term

Allow only immigrants who have shown they are very high achievers and/or can pay a large sum of money for citizenship. This will help your nation acquire good foreign genes, not the biggest losers from a shit hole country with an average IQ of 85

>>1133868

This. It's a very dangerous game to lobby for immigration as a business owner, especially because of already forseeable consequences. The populations of the West are getting increasingly political and all for the wrong reasons. Businesses across all sectors are making red figures because of this. I've seen companies taking a blow last quarter because they didn't publicly state they are against Nazis, xenophobia, the rising AfD party etc. And as you have said, taking in a large number of refugees into your business will change it.The business climate in Germany becomes dangerous as you can't just well..mind your own business anymore. Jump onto the leftist train or you will be targeted by certain interest groups. This isn't nothing new as forced quotas for women, handicapped and whatever filth are quite old now, but the intensity of this hysteria has visibly increased. The only ones shilling for this are corporate spokesmen as they have nothing to lose. Middle tier entrepreneurs are FUCKED, no matter what happens.

>>1134025
/thread
I doubt many will learn, but there's still hope. It's not too late.

>>1134005
Still waiting, btw.

>>1134041

Germany is not accepting any Ukranian refugees. Meanwhile Poland has two millions.

>>1134047
Source.

>>1133981

Answer this then:
>>1133968

>>1134049
http://newobserveronline.com/white-war-refugees-not-allowed-in-germany/

This is a English speaking news site translating a german one.

>>1133802
Trying to argue with financially illiterate stormfronters is an exercise in futility, m8.

>>1134064

Nice ad-hominem.

Have you bothered to address their arguments?

File: ledeportface.jpg (13KB, 230x262px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 230x262px

>>1133802
Government subsidized oven building would certainly improve the economy.

But seriously though, what evidence do you have that they will eventually start paying enough tax that they won't be a burden?

File: ukraine.png (1MB, 1298x864px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1298x864px

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/31/world/europe/ukrainian-migrants-fleeing-conflict-get-a-cool-reception-in-europe.html?_r=0
https://www.hrw.org/news/2014/07/31/ukraine-safe-what-planet-uk-home-office

>>1134067
Here's the deal, birthrates are declining in most developed 1st world nations. What's incredibly tragic, is that, academics and high net worth individuals are the group most affected by this decline, whereas hartz4 Ulli continues to breed like a rabbit. Statistics show that with rising income and education, people become less likely to have more than 1 child. This goes for most developed nations. Do you think these people are having less children because they don't have enough money? No. I cannot give you the reason, but it's not a lack of funds to support children with. So subsidizing children is futile. Unless you find a way to encourage smart, rich people to have more children, there is no other solution other than taking in immigrants. And even if the stormfront manchildren won't like hearing this, Hartz 4 Ulli is just as much of a human waste of oxygen as an unemployed immigrant.

>>1134064

Yes please refute my argument. I'm not being aggressive here, I'm open to having my mind changed.

Argument here:>>1134064

File: Isis (1).jpg (100KB, 842x468px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 842x468px

>>1134096
>but it's not a lack of funds to support children with
It's a lack of time. Either slash working hours or make a single job pay well enough that one parent needn't work.

You cannot seriously think that paying unemployed immigrants to churn out Islamic children is sustainable, let alone positive for the economy.

Furthermore, small population dips are nothing to fear.

>>1134096

So you say people aren't having children even though they have the money?

I'm not sure where you are living, but in America, the average middle class young adult is graduating college at 22, in debt, not getting a good job, and struggling to stabilize their life until age 30. By then, most young women are having a significant decline in fertility.

The other issue is the culture: Consumption and narcissism cause people to make anti-family decisions. They'd rather travel the world and wear nice clothing than spend that money on raising a family in a small town.

There is a solution, but you're not thinking hard enough about it.

And anything can be incentivized. Even if they are spending the money traveling the world, a $15k tax-benefit per child would easily encourage tax payers to have more children. You'd be naive if you thought otherwise.

The other benefit of the tax break is you could make it only apply to those who pay taxes. This cuts out the bottom 53% who pay no taxes (or take more than they pay)

In a few generations we could replace a big chunk of the unproductive population.

It would pay for itself in the long term, but the market thinks in minutes and days, not generations. It's bad

>>1133802
Yes, I agree. In fact, refugees are so good for Western economies that I suggest we force them to come here against their will. We go to Middle Eastern countries, find the most able-bodied individuals, and rescue them from their horrible plight. Their families will not be able to come, however. They then can have good jobs, jobs so good that they'll work 18 hours a day. They won't get paid because currency is an oppressive and capitalist institution. If any try to escape due to internalized racism, then they must be enlightened with a public flogging.

It's really for the best.

>>1133802
OP....YOU cannot be serious?
Your arguments are so idiotic I just have a hard time believing you are not trolling.
How did you actually come to this conclusion?
Why don't you give us data instead of asking for data in case of counterarguments?
Do you know that the same idiotic argument was said to the Dutch prime minister and then he laughed and said: well the problem is that there already is a lot of unemployement in the West. So taking in low educated people, who barely speak English let alone the particular language, and furthermore have a completely different culture is gonna strain the system even more.
Pls do tell how this is not true. Pls give factual data regarding the economic benefits of these "refugees" of which more than half comes from northern Africa.

File: george-soros-45-degrees[1].jpg (361KB, 1708x2200px) Image search: [Google]

361KB, 1708x2200px

>>1133802
Swefag here, I know what I'm talking about alright? The one brown person you saw in your life is the exception. Most of them are unwashed criminals, pure and simple. The fact that they refuse to assimilate, that they cause such enormous trouble wherever they go and that they even complain if they aren't given enough free stuff, shows that they have no intention to do anything but mooch. In fact, this is obvious from their "journey" alone: they pass through dozens of safe european countries, before getting to Germany. Thankfully, Swedish politicians couldn't handle the backlash and we started running out of money as well because of the rapefugees, so we had to shut the border down more or less.

>€1 jobs
That means the taxpayer pays the company the rest.
>They will get jobs
They never do, though. Most of them don't even speak the language after 10 years.
>They will pay taxes
On what earnings? We pay for everything they need already.
>They will impregnate women and raise birthrates.
Alright that's enough, Mr Soros. Shut your filthy jewish mouth and leave. Get the fuck out, you fucking traitor.

>>1133833
>Rapes spike
>Crime increases manyfold in the areas where they're present
Yeah, swell people. Just the best. Truly.

>>1133863
>Why do white nations need non-white immigrants when they could just have a government subsidy for having children?
Because the jews want the goyim to be as mixed, weak and dumb as possible. The easier they can control the rest of us, the longer they can avoid the inevitable discovery of them as the driving force behind this bullshit. They always do get found out though.

>>1133884
Tax breaks for kids. Cheap or free care for kids while you're at work. Rapefugees aren't contributing normal kids. They're contributing third world retards that will never amount to anything. Don't you see? They are genetically and culturally inferior, and they always will be.

It's always a fucking german who starts shilling for refugees. Why haven't we nuked them yet?

>>1134157
You did this entirely to yourself swedecuck, there is no need to blame "da joos" for anything. Last time I heard Sweden and Israel were flinging shit at each other like monkeys in a zoo in the political arena as well.

OP please stop getting your political info from John Oliver and half hour comedy shows. I don't know if you're trolling or not but you are seriously playing with fire you shouldn't even troll on issues like this people are incredibly stupid they will read your post and believe it I'm not even kidding common sense is dead. Shame on you when our Country becomes a third world shit hole it will be the fault of people like you.

>>1133919
but such a system already exists

>>1134157
This post is too /pol/ish for me to take seriously, you're probably full of shit.

>>1134182
>le /pol/ boogeyman

And yet you took OP's garbage post seriously, fuck off

>>1134169
>Hurr
Do you know why eastern europe is resisting this thing entirely?

Because they weren't drowned in the cancer of american (ZOG) "culture". The US might very well be the next place the jews are expelled from, seeing how utterly complete their saturation of that society is. They own your media (just like here), they own your entertainment, creation of money, all of your politicians up to the president himself.

However bad the USSR taking over half of europe was, they got the better deal in the end. People like OP are openly advocating for the end of europeans, for white genocide, and this is apparently entirely okay to you fucking morons. This might lead to civil war in europe, so maybe there is a way out though.

>>1134182
>probably
Except I'm not.

>>1134182

Either provide a counter or admit defeat.

Ad hominem won't work.

How come liberals are so incapable of seeing the future they hear John Oliver say exactly what OP said and complelty take it in like God himself said it no questions asked. Mean while Conservatives are capable of pointing out 100 reasons why this is not true and pointing 100 reasons why we should not take them. Conservatives have a fully functioning brain while liberals have 25% at best. All my friends and anyone I have ever met who is liberal even the ones that get good grades still have no common sense its like they live under a rock their entire lives. Anyonelse notice this?

>>1134182
I'm South African. It's true.

>>1134204
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IHgYPDvQFU8

makes sense now?

Question
Why are these pictures always 90% men? Are the women behind? I thought they weren't allowed to be unaccompanied.

File: 1456169766420.jpg (234KB, 1280x963px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 1280x963px

>>1134157
Sweden with the truth.

Germany has low birthrate, yes. But that doesn't mean that we need Mohamed to rape women L O L. If you ever went to Germany, refugees are people that don't speak the language and thus can't get any work. They don't work at construction because the benefits are just too good in Germany and thus it's not worth it for Refugees to work.

Nobody likes Refugees, that's why the NPD had such a spike in supporters.

>>1134216
There are 250k (yes, a quarter of a million) unaccompanied small children in Syria right now.

>>1134227
So the men up and left them rather than fight for their country? Literal scum.

What about the women though? Looks like only adult men in all the pictures I've seen.

>>1134227
That doesn't sound like many.

>>1134236
There are millions of pictures showing little children and girls, you must live under a stone. However, you can argue it's cherrypicked pictures by Jewish media.

>>1134263
>random statement based on liberal media
>OP again not giving any statistics just his insane opinion
Why are u doing this? Why? Pls...just...go somewhere else

>>1134263
>t. Salami Ackbar Mustafa Alibaba Mohamed Ahmed

OP is probably a turkroach posting from germany

>>1134263
Show me some. All the pictures I see is an endless see of adult men that could be fighting for their country. Shameful.

>>1133802
yes they will impregnate the dumb hippie liberal sluts who then will bitch about how men are pigs when they leave them for some other slut or betray them. Or they will force their submissive belief and culture onto a new generation of retards.

This influx will create:
>single moms and a horde of badly raised kids who will struggle to find a place in society
>retards who benefit of the way too generous social systems and will not adapt to european culture.

>>1134216
>>1134283
In case you are asking an honest question:
the reason why it's predominantly male is because they are more physically fit to make the trip.
When they become citizine in glorious Europoor then they have the right to import their familiy.
That is why polictians with some sense are saying that we are actually dealing with an influx three times as big instead of just literally counting the immigrants that first set foot into europe.

>>1134296
But how easy is it to get citizen status in the eu? In America for instance it could take up to a decade and you can forget about it if you came impotent illegally.

>>1133802
>they will impregnate women and raise birthrates
Literal cucks. European women dont want European girly men, so the cucks import men to satisfy their wives for them. What happened, Europe? You used to be knights.

>>1134299
Well at first when the influx started the whole idea was to give syrian refugees an instant green card for live, now (at least in NL) they changed that to max 5 years.
I am not sure how it works in germany now, but as far as I know at least syrian people are allowed to stay for life.

>>1134302
We germans have mastered the art of self-hate.

Look up Antifa. It's unbelievable.

File: 1456525999898.jpg (2KB, 125x65px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 125x65px

>>1134310
This was a mistake

>>1134210
Great vid depressing as fuck tho. Its so true tho no matter how much facts proof and logic you bring to a liberal/Democrat it won't matter because some pricks on TV say nope vote liberal kid's. They also love joking about things enough times that people instantly go into a nope that's not true mode when you bring up real facts Its like if they start laughing and making jokes about 2+2=4 and people who belive this enough times their followers would actually start believing that 2+2 cant equal 4 and you are crazy for thinking that it can even if you showed them step by step god it drives me crazy when I watch john oliver and i hear the crowd applaud like crazy every time he says some thing so inacurrate like OP.

They couldve taken way less and been better off long term in terms of economy. Its more of an excuse to be humanitarian.

>>>/pol/

>>1134263


UN data shows it's mostly men also there are plenty of cases of photographs caught red handed staging stuff or focusing on the one little girl surrounded by a whore of men.

I think both sides are arguing too much with emotions and talking less about the real situations

On the one hand you have the /pol/ type of people who just talk about cucking and rape and Islam destroying Europe and on the other hand you have people who would just accept an endless flow of illegal migrants, predominantly male, most of which are not fleeing from war but looking for a better economic situation (which they won't find in most cases)

I think it's good that the borders have now been closed, hopefully this will halt the flow to some degree. I also like the idea of, I think it was Cameron, to directly get people out of Syria, because they are those who are in actual danger and cannot flee (women, children etc.)
>>1134313
Antifa is something completely different, that doesn't have anything to do with self-hate

File: 1440562395397.jpg (7KB, 259x194px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 259x194px

>birth rates are going down
>better import shitskins instead of creating incentives to make native couples get married and creating programs to help with the price of raising a child

I don't understand this "raising a child costs a lot of money" meme

50 years ago white people were averaging like 6 kids nowadays people are bitching that 1 is too expensive

is this just a meme from selfish millennials or is there some secret tax on being white and having a baby? you'd think with all our technological progress raising a child would have become cheaper with time

obviously the pajeets, ahmeds, and juans aren't having a tough time so why are white people?

>>1134411
>that doesn't have anything to do with self-hate
wew lad

>we don't need to make children, let's just import refugees to breed with our women

File: 1421514482889.jpg (38KB, 362x346px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 362x346px

>>1134436
..wat?

I was saying that Antifa has nothing to do with self hate, it's a (mostly) extremist anti-nazi left wing movement

>>1134440
How is hating your own country and people not self hate?

>>1134443
wut? Antifa doesn't hate Germany, it hates Nazis. Nazis generally aren't accepted as part of being German

File: header.png (49KB, 700x250px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 700x250px

>>1134449
>Antifa doesn't hate Germany

>>1134425
Because white people have lost all sense of (physical) community. Businesses take advantage of that and it becomes expensive to do anything if you're white. Smelly, dirty people can have more kids because they support each other across families and across generations, and suffer a marginal loss in quality of life. That sacrifice becomes null when smelly stinky non whites actually have brains and bring value to the world around them.

More than that though, white people are just scared of having kids. I know plenty of middle income families who seem to do just fine without crowding their lives. Some of my friends are waiting for their big break in careers before settling down but I can already see their 50 year old single miserable future surrounded by stinky young brown men.

>>1134449
Nazis where german and there was more to thier policies than ooga booga lynch untermensch. The Wehrmacht commited attrocities as well, but again they had legit strategic reasons.

>>1134425
Millennials are ridiculously frugal and afraid of spending. To most of them a kid would be a unjustifiable expense because they don't bring in any money. Hell, they won't even buy anything they can't afford in cash, so none of them are buying houses and everyone is turning Home Depot shacks into homes for their wife and little dog.

>>1134425
Cost of living went up. Look up gentrification.

>>1134459
nice cherrypick

but no
>>1134464
even though this is going to be total BS since you can't even get 3 words in your sentence correct, amuse me, what were the strategic reasons of killing people who advocated free speech, had a different religion or who were born differently?

Hey guys how did this /pol/ thread get here?

Did a janitor move it? It doesn't belong here Mr. Janitor, move it back please!

>>1134468
In big cities maybe, it still doesn't explain why in rural places people aren't having kids.

File: 3scheideutschland.jpg (185KB, 585x391px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 585x391px

>>1134471
>cherrypick

just google it

>>1134477
okay I admit I was wrong. But then again, I wouldn't necessarily draw conclusions for the population based on that group

>>1134481
"self hating germans" is an /int/ meme lel.

>>1134481
Also this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Rcc7xgD2dM

Can someone explain how this is business or finance related????

Is this board really /pol/ and ethercuck now?

>>1133802
>>1133833
I am pretty sure you are cuckold fetishists, but anyway.

Your vision is lacking one essential part of the equation, the dismantling of the welfare state. Without it low income earners will be a net cost to the economy.

>>1133830
You forget that Merkel has the pressure to "do right" and undo the lingering reputation the Germans have had since WW2.

Pretty big factor to overlook.