>we handed out $6 trillion over the last decade to banks and

>>1102962
What are you referring to, exactly? The bailouts? QE? Subsidies?

>>1103050
I'm sure he is referring to all of those, and more on the general idea of artificially propping up the financial system from natural collapse

>>1102962

>blah blah blah $6 trillion

They were loans and almost all of them were paid back without issue.

>>1103086
>the US economy should have literally been destroyed because my ideals say so.

That's retarded. If you can ease the landing, why wouldn't you do it? The idea that there's "natural" and "artificial" in this situation is also retarded considering we'd never have had to bail out the banks if we had kept them "artificially" limited from getting to big to fail like we used to.

Are you unaware that these loans were paid back?

>>1103092

This.

The government loaning me $100 million isn't much good to me if they want it all back in 5 - 10 years.

During all that 2008 stuff, nobody got just "free" money. They were loans.

>>1103092
>>1103171
Except that's blatantly wrong. The fed printed five trillion dollars to buy bonds and inflate the value of the stock market. That went straight into the pockets of bankers.

>>1103050
>>1103092
>>1103125
>>1103095
>>1103171
Leftists consider lower corporate taxes theft; meanwhile, 'free' $100k African Studies degrees are an inalienable right.

Sage and move along...

>>1103191

>not knowing what a bond is