Fallout Tabletop RPG

Very huge faggot, but it looks good to me, I play 3.5/pathfinder so it's pretty basic to me, but it works for now.

>>2182943
Oh, and the 'Crit.' thing on top is minimum roll to receive a Critical Success on a d20. Starts at 20 and decreases as a function of Luck

>>2182998
So luck/3 rounded down = X
20-X= crit chance something like this?

>>2183011
Divided by two is better but same idea

>>2182992
This is actually the SECOND system I've created. The first was EXTREMELY simple (reliant on 4 stats and that's it), but it served its purpose.

My first system didn't account for anything beside Hit/Dodge and Damage. Everything else was just under 'common sense'

>>2183011
>>2183024
The function is =IF(LK=10, 18, 20-((LK-3)/5)). This makes it so that at Luck 10, Crit is on 18. On Luck 6-9, Crit is 19. Anything lower is on 20.

>>2183051
Eh, but that means having ten luck is basically worthless, why not make it 17, that one number changes a lot.

>>2183073
Worthless in terms of criticals that is

>>2183051
This sheet was actually made in Google Sheets. This is also formatted to be 2 sheets of paper, with Notes being the bottom of Page 1.

>>2183073 >>2183079
I have a few items that can increase LK and some weapons/armor decrease the Crit limit. As is, a 10 LK character can score a crit by rolling a 7 (before drugs which increase LK even more). Still, like the idea and I guess by that point, rolling a 6 for a crit because at that point, that's the playstyle (not to mention it'd be Lategame since all that is locked behind a fuckton of money and would need to be in advanced areas to even buy them)

>>2183079
Ok, I adjusted the formula to give 20 for LK<6, 19 for LK 6-7, 18 for LK 8-9, and 17 for LK 10

>>2183115
Make it so nothing can be upped beyond ten, cause infinite combo's exist in F1-F2 where you can basically have 2000 luck if you do it right if the lock on nothing goes over 10, pretty interesting stuff, and only fox is locking it at 10, or have stat buffs not be multiplicative or only stack in certain ways

>>2183215
I may have to nerf Melee Damage, because at ST 10, it's 50 and at 12... it's 84.

>>2183263
Just make it so they don't go above 10

>>2183263
Just to put some context into this, the highest melee damage I have is 80 and ignores DT/DR (Chainsaw), so Kangz 'n' Sheit here would have a base damage of 170 in one attack...

>>2183278
Well, I'm also thinking about how the HP and Damage amounts are Large rather than Small, as I took more calculations from 3 and NV for these. Not to mention how in NV, melee received Double Damage in VATS, so having a large Melee Damage bonus might still be good... I just have to devise a formula which rewards good investment without being overpowered

>>2183376
What about =MAX((( [ST] -5)* [PE] ), 1)
This makes a 10 ST, 10 PE character have a melee damage of 50, and even a 12 ST 10 PE character then receives 70 bonus damage. Though I will make it so that 10 ST is the maximum a character can START with and it can only be surpassed via chems (which have their own drawbacks, not to mention addiction penalties). So Kangz 'n' Sheit could not have the Bruiser trait, as his ST is already 10 and can't have it be '''base''' 12