Whats the difference between loli an cp?
one gets you banned here, the other not so
Principle
>>744943034
Nothing, both are for pedophiles
cp is an art, loli is for paedophiles
>>744943034
One is completely fictitious and imaginary(not real), the other involves living humans in reality(is real).
One is victim-less and the other has a victim.
One is legal and the other is illegal.
One of the things is not like the other.
>>744943694
you're no fun
>>744943034
>>744943034
Loli involves only drawings and not actually children, so it's morally acceptable.
CP and is both illegal and (often) involves the abuse of real children, which most people (possibly even most pedophiles) agree is morally repugnant.
How immoral CP is depends on whether you consider spreading CP to be:
a) re-victimisation of the original abusee and/or
b) a driving factor in the demand for CP (and therefore the demand for more abuse
It is, however, obvious that lolicon is better than CP morally.
>>744943589
kek
>>744943728
I'm not being paid to be fun
there is no difference, anyone in possession of either should be executed
>>744943885
>anyone should be executed
fixed.
also don't worry. humanity is already in the process of extinction
>>744943885
Ban and execute all the things, free for all 'Nigger' style.
>>744943885
>I don't like what you like so you should all die the post
Shame loli is illegal in the UK though. Home of the soccer mom mentality.
>>744943034
One is drawn, pure fantasy, harmless, hurts no children and the other is CP.
>>744943034
One is 2d and the other is 3d. Also this:
>>744943434
>>744943034
Post some cp and find out what happens ....
>>744943034
Loli are adorable, lewd and fun that require no investment.
Children are disgusting idiots that serve as parasites.
It's like comparing genuine art to one of those toilet sculptures.