happy inside job day yankees

File: 1500978237032.gif (497KB, 245x200px) Image search: [Google]

497KB, 245x200px

>>744894362
And they still praise their government....

Remember... WTC 7 was damaged by debris and burned for hours.

File: 1492134594975.jpg (304KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

304KB, 1920x1080px

>>744894362
>yankees
holy shit! lmao. are you from some 3rd world country in the 1930's?

File: ons.jpg (154KB, 748x561px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 748x561px

>>744894617
its a fucking magic then nothing around 7 was destroyed even those buildings between it and 1 and 2 towers

File: wtc7naudetxf5.gif (670KB, 240x180px) Image search: [Google]

670KB, 240x180px

>>744894617
>damaged by debris and burned for hours.
If you believe that really caused this, you're so fucked in the head...

The problem with this theory is how weak it thinks the conspiracy plan on the governments side, or whoever did it from the inside, is. So someone plans an attack and hit two building with planes and just makes a building collapse all by itself? Thats something you would do if you wanted the conspiracy to be exposed "as it was fucking happening".

>>744894960
Nothing magic about it.
>>744894972
At this point, only ignorant 'tards believe otherwise.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2056088/Footage-kills-conspiracy-theories-Rare-footage-shows-WTC-7-consumed-fire.html
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/design/a3524/4278874/

File: ck.jpg (153KB, 752x490px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 752x490px

yay for invisible wingless antibunker boeing !

>>744895213
Debunked. Hard.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GvAv-114bwM

Take the 30 minutes to watch this.

>>744895496
>youtube video
Ignored. Give a credible source please.

File: your-porn-collection-best-to-keep-it-to-yourself.jpg (60KB, 640x543px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 640x543px

Remember Mt St. Helens wasn't hit by an airplane either.

File: Red_Alert.jpg (105KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 1280x720px

>>744894851
im a soviet from this parallel reality where einstein travelled in time to kill hitler and everything fucked up even more

>>744895297

Protip: when planes made of lightweight metals crash at cruising speeds into solid structures, they disintegrate completely on impact. A plane didn't hit the building. A swirling cloud of shredded metal, engines, wheel assemblies, 1,000's of pounds of flesh, and other debris is what went barreling through the walls. People seem to think this is a Roadrunner cartoon where Coyote falls off the cliff and makes a perfect Coyote shaped hole in the ground, and so the Pentagon should have a plane shaped hole. Not reality.

>>744895561
>Provides links with NIST "research"
>Refuses to watch video with former NIST employee

gg m8

>>744895787
>gg m8
Thanks.

Friendly reminder that anyone can say anything on youtube.

>>744895784
browse some images how crash sites look like its always a fukin mess , there were no pieces of boeing anywhere , not to mention its impossible to fly at that height and hit like that unless pilot was superman , not to mention some crappy quality road camera actually caught that thing which hit pentagon , it looked like cruise missile combined with predator drone

>>744896908

An aircraft made out of lightweight aircraft material and loaded with enough jet fuel to reach LA smashed into the side of reinforced concrete.

>>744895919

Anyone anywhere can say anything. Thanks to the internet tho, most of it can be easily be proven or disproved with a few keystrokes.

I don't think you want to know the truth tho.

File: 598b91a5ac78c.jpg (233KB, 1067x1600px) Image search: [Google]

233KB, 1067x1600px

>>744894362
am Curious.. what do other truthers think the destination/target was of the plane that crashed in Pennsylvania?

Was it supposed to hit WTC7? or some other target

i think deep down, all americans knew 911 is bullshit. otherwise, knowing the mentality of americans, they would quit their office job in droves because apparently a few kitchen fires can take down entire buildings.

>>744897173

White house

>>744897209

it wasnt "a few kitchen fires", you fucking retard.

>>744897138
>Anyone anywhere can say anything.
Not quite the same, and I think you know that. Peer review and fact checking exist in many places, but youtube isn't one of them.
>Thanks to the internet tho, most of it can be easily be proven or disproved with a few keystrokes.
Like the conspiracy theories.
>I don't think you want to know the truth tho.
I've seen sufficient evidence to justify belief. If you have evidence from credible sources, then by all means, present it, keeping in mind that I can put in a few keystrokes to check.

File: 302.jpg (111KB, 962x770px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 962x770px

>>744897110
ya it doest make holes like this and then teleport to the moon

>>744896908
>there were no pieces of boeing anywhere

Not sure what pieces of boeing means, but there was plenty of debris, especially the heavy metal parts that would still be somewhat intact and recognizable such as engines and wheel assemblies.

>>744896908

>its impossible to fly at that height and hit like that unless pilot was superman

This is a line that people who don't know anything about flying read, absorbed it because it backs up the version of the story they choose to believe, and then they regurgitate it. Why do you think it would be impossible to fly at that altitude? There are thousands of flights every day and pilots seem to have no problem keeping the machine straight and steady. Whether it's 30,000 feet or 1,000 feet it doesn't really matter.

>>744896908
>crappy quality road camera actually caught that thing which hit pentagon , it looked like cruise missile combined with predator drone

You must be a weapon's expert to be able to recognize missile damage so easily. What that video shows is footage from parking lot cameras which shoot in very low quality and even lower frames per second. Given that the plane was going at near cruising speeds, we are very lucky to see anything at all on that footage.

xDDDD bawahhhahhaha i get it because 9/111 xDDDD same thing as alst year! XDDD

File: 20120911000920_2.jpg (2MB, 2280x1497px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2280x1497px

>>744897690

Oh boy

>>744897690
>ya it doest make holes like this and then teleport to the moon

Again, the vast majority of the plane disintegrated on impact and became a mass of shredded metal, debris, and flaming jet fuel moving through the building at several hundred miles per hour. This photo shows an interior wall, I believe the final wall that the debris punched through. The Pentagon is a series of walls in a ring much like the exterior wall. I believe the plane punched through 4 of them? I'd have to check. By the time it got to the last one much of the energy had been dispersed.

All of this is common fucking sense.

>>744894362
thank you.

File: not_mouse.jpg (711B, 279x180px) Image search: [Google]

711B, 279x180px

>>744897747
its an elephant on this picture
trust me im from CIA

>>744898090
those round holes are in those inner rings , no matter what it was it pierced almost all of them

>>744898090

Other guy who was responding to him here. This picture says it all. You can see how far the plane penetrated. Show me a missile that can do that kind of damage. The Pentagon is essentially a series of buildings in a concentric circles. There is no missile system today that can punch right through not 1, 2, 3, but at least 4 entire buildings before finally blowing up. Had this been a missile, it would have blown up inside the first building and fires would have spread out from there. What you see here are fires spreading outward from a clear line that goes through 4 rings.

>>744898162
>Source plox.

Source: widely available video and pictures from the mass of media that was present.

>>744898245

I'm sure you think you're making some kind of damning point but you're not.

BEAMS MADE OF STEEL CANNOT BE MELTED BY THE FUEL USED TO POWER JETS

>>744894362
https://youtu.be/hj3e8cKZWiY

worth the watch

>>744894362
the structural integrity was damaged by falling debris from buildings 1 and 2

>>744898986
>the structural integrity was damaged by falling debris from buildings 1 and 2

But according to OP and others, if debris hit that building, then it is required to hit all other buildings otherwise bush did 911

>>744899090
>bush did 911
if anyone it was Mossad/CIA/MI6 and the president was just a pawn

>>744899090
>>744899586
and imagine now theory some dumb goatfucker from the desert did it , thats official truth
which version is the most unreal ?

>>744899835
>and imagine now theory some dumb goatfucker from the desert did it

In that case I would certainly have a hard time believing it. But dumb goatfuckers from the desert didn't do it. This was a sophisticated operation involving educated and motivated men, planned and funded by equally educated, motivated, and extremely wealthy men like Bin Laden.

>>744894972
can someone link this gif when its not reversed please

>>744900495
you mean the original video shows how wtc7 is being built and grows from the ground ?

>>744895213
>only ignorant 'tards
Links dailymail article

>>744900882
yes, it's quite a feat of engineering

>>744895213
>dailymail
ignored.

>>744900206
Remind me who funded and trained said men?

happy dealing with Islam Pommies

>>744901625
What does this even mean?

File: waco_fire_wide-9203577b23bd582c55a3ac54d95e03ced5cd9573-s900-c85[1].jpg (108KB, 900x506px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 900x506px

Remember...no plane hit this building.

File: 1.jpg (46KB, 852x480px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 852x480px

>>744894362
7-11 WAS A PART TIME JOB! WAKE UP SHEEPLE!!!

>>744901532
>Remind me who funded and trained said men?

Doesn't matter. That was 10-15 years earlier when they were fighting a war against a common enemy. They gave them military training - irrelevant to 9/11 - and provided them with weapons - also irrelevant to 9/11. We used them as a means to an end. That doesn't make us buddies.

>>744901727
>no building hit this plane

File: 1502570880087.png (239KB, 750x732px) Image search: [Google]

239KB, 750x732px

>>744901755

File: WTC Collapse Article EPN_47-4 extract-1.jpg (277KB, 1654x2339px) Image search: [Google]

277KB, 1654x2339px

Here have some scientific backup.

>>744902112
>scientists have been working to understand why and how these unprecedented structural failures occurred.

Don't anyone spoil the ending for them, but it's because fully loaded and fueled passenger jets crashed into them at cruising speed.

File: 5484.jpg (56KB, 634x422px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 634x422px

>>744901727
youre saying americans build skyscrapers out of wood and paper ?
remember grenfell tower ? it was burning and burning and didnt wanna stop goddamn burning , after that it was standing still
and it was just a slums block for poorfucks

>>744902473

There's one key difference here though.

>>744902323

File: 1459381227856.png (276KB, 410x350px) Image search: [Google]

276KB, 410x350px

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IX4X2I4HQ7s>>744895297

>>744902027
can you explain that meeting between cia and binladens people before attack

>>744902323
>but it's because fully loaded and fueled passenger jets crashed into them at cruising speed.
That is definitely what they'll be paid to say.

the beams didnt need to melt, they just became week enough to fall on each other

>>744902648
can you prove that the meeting happened?

>>744902541
But only 2 buildings were hit and the others were brought down by "fire".

>>744902777
>the beams didnt need to melt, they just became week enough
>can you prove that the meeting happened?

Can you prove you're not retard? Your grammar says otherwise.

>>744902777
theyve admitted that in some progoverment bullshit , by mistake i guess

>>744902835

You put fire in quotation marks as if you are implying there weren't fires. And how were those fires started? From tons upon tons of debris, especially 8,000 lb steel i beams, falling on the roof. These of course fell completely through, creating huge holes in the buildings which allowed fire to quickly engulf them.

Anything else? Everything you have is easily debunked with simple common fucking sense.

File: WTC Collapse Article EPN_47-4 extract-6.jpg (493KB, 1654x2339px) Image search: [Google]

493KB, 1654x2339px

Au contraire:

Conclusion
It bears repeating that fires have never caused the total
collapse of a steel-framed high-rise before or since 9/11.
Did we witness an unprecedented event three separate
times on September 11, 2001? The NIST reports, which
attempted to support that unlikely conclusion, fail to per-
suade a growing number of architects, engineers, and
scientists. Instead, the evidence points overwhelmingly
to the conclusion that all three buildings were destroyed
by controlled demolition. Given the far-reaching impli-
cations, it is morally imperative that this hypothesis be
the subject of a truly scientific and impartial investigation
by responsible authorities.

>>744903113
Building 7 was not hit by debris. Apply that common sense of yours to watching the footage without bush's dick in your mouth.

>>744903122
>It bears repeating that fires have never caused the total
>collapse of a steel-framed high-rise before or since 9/11.

Have these previous examples had fully loaded and fueled jets crash into them at cruising speeds? Did they have 110 stories of flaming steel beams fall on them?

Protip: The reason the tower collapses were unprecedented is because *gasp* the situation itself was unprecedented.

File: 220px-Rumsfeld1.jpg (21KB, 220x275px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 220x275px

>>744894362
>>744894362
>>744894362
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVpSBUgbxBU

/thread

>>744903310
>Building 7 was not hit by debris.

It was. You are done here.