are there buff aliens somewhere in the universe
>>744388655
of course pendeho
unicorns also
>>744388655
kiero
Dunno, but the odds that aliens evolved in a way that we would characterize them as buff seem pretty slim.
Realistically, if there are over 200 billion galaxies and every galaxies has millions if not billions of solar systems and one for them can support life and the life form on that planet has the same structure as us. Yes, it's very possible.
>>744388655
There's a bunch at my gym. Everyone there is Polish or Mexican.
>>744388655
What OP, sucking human dick isn't enough for you anymore?
>>744388655
You want them to fuck you in the ass op?
>>744388655
>obvious prosthetics
>>744389043
>>744388999
N-NO
>>744388655
>>744388908
Actually, aliens probably would look like us.
They'd be bound by the same mass/density physics as us, so they'd fit into a pretty narrow sweet spot where they could leverage tools from their environment in a metabolically efficient way. Further, odds are they'd have evolved to catch prey (meat is a more dense food than plant, so plant-eaters need exponentially more food, by volume, to do the same work.) They'd be inside of a meter bigger or smaller than us if they had ever developed any kind of industry, and they'd probably breathe oxygen. That's the only combination that would let them build sustainable campfires, and fire is a precursor to any other technology.
So yeah -- aliens at roughly our level of development (somewhere between caveman and Star Trek) would probably look pretty familiar in most physical ways.
>>744388655
aliens arent real
>>744389303
so fake
>>744388655
If we find simple life on mars. Then we are the buff aliens.
>>744389483
No.
>>744388655
We are the aliens to somebody. So yes. There are buff ayylmaos
>>744388655
>>744389483
>They'd be bound by the same mass/density physics as us
Correct.
>so they'd fit into a pretty narrow sweet spot where they could leverage tools from their environment in a metabolically efficient way.
I think you are ignoring possibilities here. Also, tool use / industry were not specified anywhere.
>Further, odds are they'd have evolved to catch prey (meat is a more dense food than plant, so plant-eaters need exponentially more food, by volume, to do the same work.)
Depends on the environment and ecosystem. Even meat eaters need not have evolved to catch prey.
>They'd be inside of a meter bigger or smaller than us if they had ever developed any kind of industry
> That's the only combination that would let them build sustainable campfires
How did you come up with this? How do you even know what the fuel source for fire would be like?