fluffy thread
>>742064747
>Starts fluffy thread
>Doesn't contribute at all
>Dies
>>742066333
That dialogue."so you are blindo now? I didn't love you anymore". You can tel when russians made them.
I can't help but look at these threads. I love fluffies, if they were real I'd get one and treat it perfectly. However, the idea of choking one and having him/her plead with me with their life would be entertaining. I'd never directly harm an animal irl, but fluffy ponies bring something inside me out I can't explain. It's like a primal thing.
On one hand I want to love one with all my heart and treat it as best I can possible treat a fluiffy. On the other hand though, i think I'd enjoy giving him/her the sorry stick for making bad poopsie. I wouldn't go nuts with abuse though, just discipline.
So what is it about fluffies that does it for you guys? I'm curious.
that they trigger people
keep tring, someone might start to care about what you think
>>742066730
Captain, the butthurt readings in this post are off the chart!
try harder
>>742066824
Also, we need a fluffy version of pic related
>>742067263
I dont get it
>>742067240
Those are some big goddamn turds for such a tiny fluffy.
>>742067267
You're misguided attempt at trying to stop others from liking what you don't like is failing, and will always fail, you self righteous waste of matter.
>>742067318
"Wings" = rings. The fluffy's bones didn't develop to be strong enough to support it, because the metal rings did that instead. When they were removed the fluffy wasn't able to move without the support they gave.
>>742067593
That's fluffies. Strong colon, weak sphincter
>>742067935
>>742067847
> "What is, 'Pissing into an ocean of piss?' Alex."
>>742067689
>Thinking he won't fail like every other spammer.
I would do this if fluffies were real
>>742067633
> this why we shouldn't have saved carrot
>>742068335
>>742068126
Ok...
this thread is good
yummy grassy
>>742066769
Autism
>>742067689
Don't send them to my home board you faggot. Keep this stuff on this failing shithole /b/ you call a board.
>>742068335
The largest, densest black hole in our universe is 17 billion times the density of our own home sun. This black hole has dreams that it will one day, with a little luck and effort, that it will be as dense as you.
Those dreams will never be achieved
>>742068335
>>742068570
>can destroy your life
>is on /b/
????
>>742066730
>>742068647
>>742068674
>>742068688
>>742068699
Don't forget to report his posts as spamming is against the rules
>>742068570
Id say your results would be underwhelming.
I'm so fucking angry these fluffy threads are taking up space that could be used for trap and scat fetish threads. How am I supposed to finger my asshole without them? Good thing I still live off my parents, or work might get in the way of posting all day!
>>>/trash/ >>>/trash/ >>>/trash/ >>>/trash/
i never got the appeal of fluffy - did /mlp/ start making these when they stopped getting attention for regular ponies?
>>742068570
That's like play violent video games and expecting my friends and family to care.
>>742068864
They were made to piss off MLP autists
>>742068910
but they're complete degenerates - why would they be pissed? and why keep posting them when there are no more bronies around?
This thread is, and I do not say this lightly, worse than 100 September 11ths.
It's really depressing how far Larry will go to pretend that anyone but him has a problem with fluffy abuse
>Too late for cawwot.
>>742067689
Wouldnt be a fluffy thread without this guy, the social backlash by normies makes it more appealing
And keep in mind that a high volume of reports on a post will auto delete the posts, and a high volume of reports on a user on an IP address will auto-ban the user or IP. THAT'S why you ALWAYS report posts.
>>742066730
>get dick rating threads of /b/
>get loli threads of /b/
do these first and you may have a deal
>>742068963
Thry got their own following after a while. And bronies are touchy bitches, they get their panties in a bunch when you draw nazi ponies.
>>742069235
Alright Larry, calm down
>>742068963
I can almost guarantee you that every sperging, spamming autist is a brony. Like Fuckface McOptical-illusion here.
>>742069235
I loved killing the grunts on halo too.
The community loves to hurt fluffy creatures that are not real.
>>742069403
Grunts were at their best when they spoke English. They were funny as hell.
>>742067687
thanks
Oh hey look what I just finished and uploaded to the booru.
>>742069512
>adolescent animals
It's amazing that you're trying to make an actual argument around that even being a thing
>>742069512
Are you saying Grunts are not adolescent creatures?
Are you saying fantasizing on an actual video game is somehow ok and better?
Where are you getting this adolescent animal thing? Fluffies are dumber than a 2 year old.
>>742069235
>DeltaFosB
We get it, you don't like fluffy threads; don't spread some kind of pseudoscience bullshit to try and rationalize your hangups.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11572966
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18293355
Your conclusions are incorrect, the articles above were conducted with "drugs of abuse", namely cocaine, morphine, ethanol, and THC. Show me a study with human subjects in response to stimulation similar to that of this thread.
>>742069837
Are you aware that fluffies don't exist in real life? Are you incapable of understanding that fluffies are a metaphor for how greedy, incompetent, and mentally small the majority of the population is?
Lol, get fucked SpamAnon.
>>742069837
I don't have a desire to hurt animals.
I love making fun of fake cute fluffy creatures.
I doubt anyone here is a serial killer.
You think it is better for me to play video games online with my friends torturing grunts, but somehow a fluffy is more evil?
Ding dong the spammers dead
>>742066897
>>742067027
>>742067098
It all got deleted. What happened?
>>742070171
spammer got the sowwy stick, just like last week when he kept posting that +1 image limit spam
>>742070171
Just a spammer that thought he was high and mighty because he didn't like what was in the thread. Kept posting optical illusions and sucking the dick of a misinterpreted research venture to rationalize his sad life.
>>742070270
So /trash/fag made his return and got banned again? Fucking lol.
oh the faggot fucked up again. wonder how that's considered spam? seemed like he actually just wanted to talk this time
>>742070557
I wonder if he's going to come back for a third time, seeing how successful he's been.
If he actually wanted to talk then he shouldn't have been banned, but from what I can tell it seems like he was just fucking with us as usual.
>>742067722
Ask and ye shall recieve
>>742070557
He was posting with the sole purpose of filling up the thread's image limit so less content pertaining to the thread's topic could be posted.His ultimate goal is to frustrate anons to the point that they stop making the types of threads they don't like. Spiderfags, ChocoBro, VroomAnon, and the occasional gore poster all hope to accomplish the same thing, and it is considered spam.
He's likely to come back, and get banned, again.
>>742066730
>>742070872
>VroomAnon
Explain pls.
>>742071023
Posted pics of cars and only said "Vroom".
>>742071114
Oh. Seems like Chocobro is the only spammer that's stuck around.
>>742071177
Birdfag is a different variety of spammer. I've seen plenty of threads where he posts once and if no one acknowledges his post he never posts in that thread again. If you do reply, then he avatar fags until you ignore him again. It's like dogs pissing in the same fence post.
>>742067292
>>742067316
I don't know why this pisses me off about fluffies so much. He got to keep his "wumps", has a nice home, toys, bed, an "mummuh", but he would throw it all away to run off with that filthy feral and forget the lady who cared for and loved him. He thinks life will be all sunshine and rainbows, judging from his fantasy, but he has no idea how cruel the world of a feral is. Why are fluffies such ingrates? Are you better off getting a brown or runt feral foal, who knows how bad his life outside his new home is? They just recklessly breed for some overwhelming desire for babbehs, without considering how they will need to be protected and cared for, and even run away for a life as a feral to do it. In this, and Millie's story, they say their owner is a "dummeh" and wish to run off, then the consequences are never been the same. Millie and Marty deserve their respective punishments. They're annoying, stupid, and dirty, but this kind of behavior makes me want to reign down punishment in the form of making their life, and the foals, a living hell, without them knowing it's me, and making them curse the day they ran away. /rant
>>742071525
wtf
>>742071525
Well, they are pretty stupid and their desire to have children is a major part of their psychology. Combine the two and you'll get fluffies disobeying their owner to start a family without understanding the consequences of that decision.
>>742071896
>>742071525
Fluffies are like humans. There are kids and teens who grow up in safe neighborhoods with good parents, plenty of friends, good education, and still choose to run off with some strange love or resort to criminality.
>He thinks life will be all sunshine and rainbows, judging from his fantasy, but he has no idea how cruel the world of a feral is.
Fluffies are stupidly naive and think life and the world is all about hugs, love, playing, babies. That's why they are so ill prepared to face the brutal reality.
>hey just recklessly breed for some overwhelming desire for babbehs, without considering how they will need to be protected and cared for, and even run away for a life as a feral to do it.
All fluffies are instinctively driven to breed all the time. It's a design flaw. It's why they are classed as vermin. A small group of fluffies can greatly increase their numbers if they are allowed to breed too much.
Also, humans are the same. Take a look at Africa. The people there have barely food and water, and yet they do nothing but breeding. The population in Africa will by the year of 2050 have doubled, and by 2100 it will be double again.
Would you breed a fluffy if she asked for it? Assuming she could accommodate you comfortably.
Would anyone like a CYOA fluffy story?
Nu faiw! Fwuffy wan wide on teh Owient Expwessie.
But it weft wifout Fwuffy!
Dummeh Owient Expwessie! It had nummies tuu!
>>742072390
More content is good content.
>>742070872
a fluffy mod? top kek. do you think the lack of chemo has destroyed /b/ or made it a better place? I'm of the former opinion
>>742068973
but 9/11 was fucking AWESOME! i loved every minute of it!
>>742072635
Allahu Ackbar.
>>742072539
Where did I mention a fluffy mod? Or are you assuming whoever is banning spammers is biased to fluffy threads? Honestly I couldn't care less of the "integrity" of /b/. It will always be what it is at the moment you observe it, kinda like a quantum pile of shit.
>>742073092
This is why Pumpkiikin is fucking cancer
>>742072910
oh you didn't. I guess I can understand, mods really do see the worst of this cesspool we call /b/. I think it skews their opinions though unfortunately. it's not so much a culture anymore.. it's like the newfags are learning from the newfags. you know that experiment with the monkeys following suit not knowing why? that's kind of where we've ended up. I don't think it bodes well for the longevity of this site. praise the silent heroes though. mods=gods
>>742072194
Yeah, off topic, but maybe we should limit food aid in Africa to 2 kids. Same with migrants in Europe. They wanna breed? Well, food donations and welfare stop at 2, so who's gonna go hungry? Of course, in the US, my friend overheard this lady saying dhs took her kids, so she has more kids to keep the check coming in. Your name on 2 kids birth certificates? Too bad, that's your 2. Goes for daddy, too.
>>742064747
Is it wrong of me to want to own an actual fluffy as a pet?
>>742068973
>>742072635
>>742072700
Mandatory pic related.
>>742073723
No, they're cute and fluffy.
It would be wrong if you only wanted them to be real so you could abuse them
>>742071114
AND THEN THEIRS ME THE ONE WGO HATES THE ONE WHOSE VERY SOUL BURNS FOR TORTURE AND SUFFERING WITH THE WHITE HOT BURNING OF A BILLION SUNS COME TO LIFE IN THE NAME OF DESTRUCTION FOR ALL BAD SHALL DIE BY THE HANDS OF THE JUST YES YES OH FUCKING GOD YES I LOVE SEEING THE PAIN THE SCREAMS THE LOOK OF OVERWHELMING SEETHING BOILING BUBBLING SHOTGUNS OF PAIN IN THEIR BLOOD SHOT EYES GIVES ME THE GREATEST OF PLEASURES OH THE DEATH THE BLOOD THE MIND WARPING HATE OF ALL CONSUMES MY ALL OF THINGS FOREVER
>>742073797
They're so cute, but these threads make me sad. Is everyone here a psycho or something?
>>742073723
No, nothing wrong. They're cute, furry, fluffy, can easily train them, can talk with them...
>>742073797
I would personally adore to have one, but I would never abuse it, even though I utterly enjoy abusebox.... which is ironic lol.
>>742073602
That's not good enough. All food aids must stop. Nature is trying to fix the overpopulation and we are preventing it from happening. Mass sterilization is also needed, but that's harder to fix.
>>742073937
No, I've seen some hugbox in these threads, there are people here who love fluffies.
>>742073595
I guess I can see why chemo isn't a thing any more* sorry.
>>742073942
I would adore to have a fluffy too.
>>742073937
I like fluffies, I like abusebox, I like drawing abusebox.... but one thing is for sure: I would never actually hurt a fluffy if they were real. I don't like hurting living things (not even plant lol).
>>742072539
I guess it all depends on what you consider cancer and what made the old /b better than the new /b. I'm a newfag, so I wouldn't know how good or bad old /b was.
>>742066769
for me, it's because they can talk I'd get aggressive with them. but at the same time, I'd adore them and treat them with respect for that very reason.
>>742073723
I think it would be weird to have a pet that could talk and reason as a toddler.
Bump!
>>742073937
no, not everyone in here is sadistic or psychotic. I couldn't hurt an animal irl or even a fluffy if they were real. I get mad when my cat shits on my floor, but I don't get a stick and hit him or anything because I love him
>>742073793
Haha!
commencing shaferaraks dump
>>742074410
If fluffies didn't speak then they would be much less popular, both for hugbox and abusers. Their ability to speak (and intelligence) is what separates them from other pets.
>>742074682
>>742073793
There is another pic of a rag head fluffy shouting "awahu ackbaw" but I just can't find it.
>>742074758
Sorrystick? It more looks like a police baton.
>inb4 #thatsnothowabortionworks
>>742074795
I see.
>>742074320
well, I remember a time where I could open up /b/ and get a genuine laugh at one of the first things I saw. I'm of the opinion it was due to two things: novelty of 4chan and the culture that was shaped and sustained. we won't ever get the novelty back but the culture can certainly be re-established. this place is still the asshole of the Internet but not the way it was. /b/ was (and to a certain extent still is) a place to express the monsters everyone is deep down. there's definitely at least one of those old fags in here making the 9/11 joke kek. anyways, I think chemo played a huge hand in shaping that culture. anons knew to denounce what wasn't acceptable. anons also genuinely stood as gatekeepers, and it looks like that has died off. I don't even remember the last time I saw someone get called a newfag.
>>742075238
I want to hug this fluffy to be honest.
last one
>>742073937
It's only funny to see them suffer because it's not real. It tears me up to see pain in even a mouse. I got a new set of traps because I watched a mouse get snapped in one, but it didn't die. It struggled until it suffocated. The trap was just strong enough to choke it, not do fatal damage like other traps. I eat meat, too. But I try to minimize pain in any way possible, even for what people consider vermin. I know food chain, so I eat meat, and I know mice can carry disease and contaminate food, but I take no joy in the pain of other living things. But fluffy is like Tom and jerry; it's not real animals, hell, not even a real species, so I can find it funny.
>>742075204
there goes my sides
>>742074823
Anything can be a sorrystick.
Even a pencil, a ruler, a police baton, a baseball bat, or even the torn horn of fluffy's dead mother.
>>742075689
That sounds like some savage shit.
Would using a medieval flail be a good sorrystick or is that too edgy?
Do you guys jerk off to this shit or what? What's the deal here?
What the fuck is this shit?!
>>742075790
Well, the sorry stick is a tool meant for discipline, not torture and execution.
>>742075816
Most get sadistic pleasure, some sexual arousal and some others just like the cuteness.
>>742075833
>>742075816
>20 seconds apart
Samefag.
>>742075816
By the looks of it. This is some very disturbing hybrid between furries, scat and torture/gore porn. To hell with it people are fucked up these days.
>>742075880
That's true.
But still it would sound satisfying to use against a smarty.
>>742075816
Have you not seen what people jerck off to?Im sure some do but that is besides the point.
>>742074962
That pedo fluffy would suffer the pain of a thousand deaths before I was done. I won't list the horrible things I'd do, but hat guy who turned a smarty into a plushy is on the right path.
>>742076070
>some do
I'm afraid that's all there is to it.
>>742074962
What a careless owner! Can't he see that his pet is crying? The fluffy is clearly not okay...
>>742076153
Pretty sure they are a minority, but why would you be afraid of what a bunch of Randys you most likely will never meet fap to?
>>742076371
Not all hugboxers are good owners. Maybe she will eventually notice that the foal is coming home with a ruptured anus every day.
Like in pic related. Foals suffer from a stupid hugboxer.
>>742066444
checked
>>742075790
What kind of monster are you?
A medieval flail would only kill the fluffy, or in the best case would severely injure it, as the flails are made of iron and are too heavy, and fluffies are not THAT resistant.
Moreso, those things have spikes, some way too large and would pierce the fluffy and probably kill it.
The idea is to just punish, no
>>742077563
The idea is to just punish, not kill or permanently injure your biotoy.
>>742066333
>STAR WARS
Bump!
make requests guys, I can do anything from gifs to comics to single images to reaction pictures... just tell me what you want.
-FluffyFoals
>>742079917
pic of you with sharpie in pooper and timestamp.
>>742079917
Fluorescent fluffies being used as a lightbulb
>>742079988
I dont even own a sharpie and I never plan on revealing what I look like. Fluffies are worse than being part of the KKK if found out lol
>>742080155
neat, I'll get on it
>>742080528
Nice, I've been wanting fluorescent fluffies to be a thing for a while but I'm too lazy to make it myself lol
>>742080447
you don't have to reveal what you look like with a sharpie in pooper pic. your ass isn't your face, probably. and if people can recognize you from that, what kind of slut are you?
>>742080821
What I look like isn't just my face. No part of me will ever be shown on 4c. Not because I'm embarrassed or anything, I just don't feel the need for any attention of that variety.
>>742080703
I actually have a comic book page in the works involving a glow in the dark fluffy, but a fluorescent one sounds neat too. Here I am studying how lightbulbs work and plug in for this, lol
Would anyone buy "baldies"?
Fluffies who've had their fluff permanently removed so that they can be sold to people who are allergic.
>>742080975
Link, please?
guess who's here
>>742081314
the image >>742080975
is the comic book page wip I was talking about, unless you're wanting a link to my lightbulb research?
>>742081045
Thought canon was that they were designed to have hypo-allergenic fluff anyway?
>>742081655
>>742081643
yeah, i think they were
>>742079917
My request has been the same, a pissed off Griffen slaughtering a fluffy herd that stole its food, was originally going to let them off since it was in a good mood until a smarty crapped projectile crapped on it when it tried explaining to them that it is dumb to steal a griffins food.
>>742081738
>>742081568
I misunderstood your comment, nevermind
>>742077563
If it's a smarty then it's justified.
>>742081816
>>742081643
Is there even a solid canon to fluffies? Where does it come from?
>>742081836
IMAGE LIMIT DAMN IT
>>742077627
If it's a smarty then I would.
>>742081875
Hell
>>742081737
I need to stop using a mobile for fluffy threads...
>>742081901
Tiem fow stawt niu th...fff...fwead?
>>742081875
>a solid canon
No. There are a shitload of common themes but you'll find some details get changed. For instance fluffy behavior has been argued to be programmed like you would a computer and an electrical shock can reset it's personality like a robot. The opposing argument is they are simply genetically engineered and this determines their traits.
>>742081875
Majority of standardised, accepted, canon is in guidelines on the booru.
The "personal head canon" is where variations such as how intelligent alicorns are, can fluffies count past "aww hoofsies", can unicorns do more than shoot sparks and/or make their horn glow and, most importantly, the "smarty or hellgremlin" question are set for each author or artist's works.
>>742082489
For my writing I am making it so that there are both and it depends how bad the smarty syndrome is for them.