Not sure how I ended up with this...pretty sure I'm an anarchist.
you guys are okay too
im a bit impressed..... i knew i was centrist but not that much....
if that what helps you sleep at night in Trump's america
>Once they wake up and see the light
you mean once they wake up and look back to see 4 years of not a single day going by without Trump saying or doing something incredibly stupid?
millenials and even gen z fags are overwhelmingly left leaning. trump and his many gaffes have galvanized them even further. /pol/ might have been able to sneak trump in under their noses last time because ARE U KIDDING ME??? TRUMP??? but i'd be surprised if it happened again.
I remember when I was young and dumb. Check it
>implying I'm even Christian
How does it feel knowing that you subscribe to the most epistemologically invalid system of thought in the 21st century? One day you'll look back at where you are now and cringe realizing that your entire worldview is based off of impressing your friends in high school.
This sums me up perfectly - a Centralist who believes that progress (moving forward) is more important that sticking to the past.
Of course it is, do you think rich people sit around all day smoking cigars and peering from their towering skyscrapers down at the unwashed populace below, twirling their comical monopoly guy mustaches?
Spoiler alert: they work 80+ hours a week and are incredibly efficient while they do it.
Sure, some do, poor people do shit by the same token.
Most people who are in the upper class + keep working past the point where they are wealthy, they are that kind of people.
Indolent, lazy, wealthy people exist, I think you put too much weight on them.
why not give me a valid argument that inst muh humanity for not eliminating those who cant support themselves? I work in a retard tier career path but live on my own, and make enough to pay my taxes, and not need subsides. im doing my part to not drain on society.
Why isn't "muh humanity" a good argument? Keeping in good will with our fellow man is an intregal part of western culture.
How about "pull your own weight" is a subjective matter, so the execution squads could come for you depending on who's in charge.
muh humanity isnt valid because it isnt efficient. the retards who get foodstamps without working, and have been on welfare for 2 years should be cut off. death squads also would cost too much just stop supplying the dead weight. its one thing to work as a janitor be single and need some food stamps. it another to have 8 kids be an addict, and havent worked in 4 years. some people are simply dead weight and should be treated as such.
If you leave people to starve, you'll end up getting mobbed by starving poor people.
Crime and riots increase as young males in poverty have worsening conditions.
As much as it might delight you to let people die in stricken poverty it is neither efficient or moral. If you want efficient go with gulags or death squads, if you want moral give them basic needs to prevent crime/riots.
its pretty easy to solve your perceived problem.
prisons should be work camps.
extra funding could be used to better schooling system
suddenly you make the dregs of society useful ditch diggers are in high demand. plus you give them a viable alternative by increasing the amount of public education they could receive.
also morality is subjective numbers are all that matter.
>morality is subjective numbers are all that matter
You wouldn't be saying that as a throng of starving men were smashing down your door because you let them starve to death.
I think you'd find that creating work camps is a recipe for disaster, didn't work for Hitler, Stalin, or anyone else I know of.
I'm not a libertarian, I think taxes are critical and always think about roads man.
But in all seriousness expecting charity to take the place of tax for poverty relief is either morally bankrupt or hilariously misfounded, disbanding critical government regulatory commissions because "muh free market" is equally as misfounded.
Libertarians think everyone is as intelligent as they perceive themselves to be, which even if their perception is true, is unfair to the extreme.
Democratic Socialism is more for authority. They want to be able to tell you what you can and cannot do. Also on the chart, Progress should be on the left side and Tradition on the right.
we do it currently prisons have work programs that felons are forced to participate in. the scope of people this would affect isnt massive. its maybe at most 2-5% of the entire us population. I think it work great social Darwinism is a must for us as a society to move forward. you are responsible for yours and your own if my family needed money desperately I'd help them. but I dont give a shit really about anyone else. can you honestly say you do? that the random retard whose hungry matters to you? the capable survive, or none survive.
guess i'm a libtard
I'm a little bit scared by the societal axis, really. I like the hard sciences, and think they can help us live better than we are now. Anything humanities that's not history can suck a dick.
I honestly hate 9/10 democrats and liberals with a burning passion but my views are very liberal
Probably because America's left has gotten way too authoritarian, and is going full on Marxist.
How do you feel about the social stuff that the left is pushing right now? Are you in the progressive boat because of the drugs and the environment and the fuck religion, or do you like their message?
You're pretty alright, anon. We could get along. We'd have rough patches, but we could talk something out.
I hate democrats because all they do is pander to people, most of them arn't actually pushing anything, they're just complaining loud enough to get people's attention. The more laws made to "benefit" socialism, the closer you become to Khrushchev-type communism
Why the fuck am I even on /b?
I clearly don't belong here, being the proud owner of a conscience.
Global socialism without a strong government? What are you, twelve?
Fuck utopias, struggle keep us healthy
Those who want to live, let them fight, and those who do not want to fight in this world of eternal struggle do not deserve to live.
I thought I'd be a lot more liberty orientated.
I have some problems with this result. Whoever wrote this is clearly a liberal rightist.
The implication that socialism means the government should interfere in the economy is just flat-out wrong. Any leftist would tell you that state intervention is a NECESSARY COMPONENT of the bourgeois system. To oppose government intervention is to oppose a fundamental component of the capitalist order. I should be 100% on the social category but I'm not because of this dumb test.
War to destroy tyranny isn't the same as imperialist aggression. Why am I considered a pacifist because I don't want to rape and pillage other peoples? Why am I a nationalist if I support anti-imperialist war? Fucking dumb
Not entirely happy with the result but I got an 82.5% so it's pretty ok on this front I guess.
>traditional vs. progressive
"Progress for the sake of progress" is just as retarded as "tradition for the sake of tradition". Some traditions are very useful even today and almost ALL were useful at some point in the past. I think we should get rid of outdated traditions which no longer make sense due to changing conditions like technology, development, population growth, etc. but keep the ones which are harmless or which still help us.
National liberalism masterrace. I'm guessing most newfags here are leftists now.