So you think it's only dnc bots posting? I knew you trumptards lived in a different reality.. So I guess I shouldn't be shocked you lived in denial
come on man. We don't think it's all DNC bots. It's nigger BOTS too.
Yeah, Trump's term is about over. Even powerful people on wall street have had about enough.
He's going to be ousted by impeachment or forced resignation because as it stands the GOP doesn't stand a chance in the 2018 mid terms without that happening.
The experiment has failed, it's over, time to move on and let the big boys take over.
this is the height of liberal brainwashing. Sad part is, you actually believe this is going to happen. Well, it's not. He'll be in for 8 years, the 2018 midterms will be a slaughter for Dems and maybe, just ,maybe if they get rid of all their social politic hacks and the Pelosis and Shcumers they may have a chance in 2024. But probably not. America is just sick of their bullshit and socialist propaganda. So sick in fact, that they don't even listen to this shit anymore. So pack up your shit, you whiney communist cunt bag. Summers almost over.
When the potential of damage is high, it's better to distract than to directly confront. The shit posting is just the distraction.
Basically, the Trumpflakes are triggered.
They are bots. Trump's version of censorship.. Since they won't close a thread, due to freedom of speech. They can flood it with bots to keep them from looking bad. It's sad really. The trigger to bring bots out.. Is to reply with a certain response
Thinks that, while not even remotely possible, getting rid of Trump will undo the slaughter of Dems in the house, Senate, and governorships, and the Supreme Court which be be red for generations. Keep whacking it snowflake.
Yea the Republicans are done now because of trump.. Sad.. No repeal and replace.. They had 7 years. Putting our national monuments for sale.. He's just done. The people have realized that Republicans have nothing good to contribute..
Of what? I still don't understand what this is about.
>First it was the Trump won the election because Russians hacked the voting booth
>Then it was Trump won the election because Russians hacked the people's minds via propoganda beware of FAKE NEWS
>Just listen to the Comey hearing (admitted nothing) or CNN (had a producer admit it was all a fake story for ratings)
>Now it's Russians didn't hack anything but Trump definitely won because he got secret info from the Russians via Trump Jr that he didn't use in election and which the only evidence of this conspiracy is s meeting on the possibility of the Russians cooperating with the Trump's when they push to send Hillary to Prison
SHE LOST. WE WON. GET OVER IT.
Do you even keep up with current events?
Apparently not. Tax Cuts just failed. That's not going to sit well with the centrists. Yet another Trump campaign promise broken. Damn son, that list is getting really long now. You think that voters are going to accept that? If so, you're delusional. They will vote full democrat tickets in the mid terms to punish the GOP, just like has happened many times in the past. Have you ever even researched a little bit of politics?
>Tax Cuts just failed.
Do you just not keep up with current events?
Yes let's all just vote strictly again the other side instead of voting against the people stopping the things we want from happening... good gyom
A two party system is the only way to stop corruption gyom
Nigger, I'm suprised if you even knew who montesqiue is or what the tyranny of the majority entails. Our entire history was founded on keeping mob rule from spiralling us out of control to pursue true liberty, and yet you morons with your high school diploma would flush all of that down the toilet for your neo liberal economic dreams.
>Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) said there’s “no evidence” to suggest that there are not enough votes in the House for full repeal of Obamacare. He added that Republicans should not send mixed messages to their constituents on the repeal.
And you didn't even read my article. Sorry shitlib, if the left can't even agree on tax cuts for the middle class and tax hikes on the upper class out of sheer partisanship then it's your fault for being so salty about the election.
>"Political strategists say..."
>1 political "analyst"
>Daniel Clifton of Strategas
>"Strategas is a global institutional brokerage and advisory firm. The Firm provides macro research, capital market and corporate advisory services, and financial products to institutional investors and corporate executives, in more than twenty countries, around the world."
>"Strategas is an independent, private partnership committed to providing superior services in the old Wall Street tradition..."
here's your (((You)))
Nigger I'd be surprised if you even knew what an ad hominem was. So instead if attacking anything he said in the article you
>Oh fuck he's involved in high finance there is no way he knows what he is talking about when it comes to tax reform and the politics of the economy
Like bruh, really?
You know what's even funnier?
>1 analyst says
Because if there were nor that would somehow make what he said more true topkek. What is argumentum ad populum and what is your job right , night shift janitor at some office? Nah I'm thinking NEET
>dnc bots posting
and thanks for re-posting my meme. That's all I ever wanted. you know. validation. and you gave it to me.
and thank you to the russiantrumpfagspambot that kept your thread alive longer than it would have and kept that image in the catalog
and thank you Mom and apple pie. God bless America.
>People involved in high finance don't know anything about politics
Holy fucking kek, I might screen cap this for future lulz. You know what's worse is that you're still making an ad hominem under the assumption that you are somehow intellectually superior to this person for skim reading the titles of news sites whose main articles you don't even bother to read. Yes people in high finance are keenly aware of the politics that go into the economy. Like wtf how much more.stuoud can you become?
>Proceeds to ad hominem
Ad hominem is when you counter someone's arguments with an attack on their character. You arguments so far have been ad populum and ad hominem, none of which are true arguments. How many more times do I need to tell you not reading that article and instead posting an ad hominem means you have technically argued nothing?
For what? How is me posting a guy who works in high finance 's political opinions on congressional budget hearings BAD? You guys didn't read the article, you just think because he works in high finance that he is therefore a liar a priori.
Lol we aren't the ones who call in the bots because we need a safe space. For 8 years they screamed races cries. Made fun of their own president. Just wouldn't shut up.. And since day one.. They can't even take a bit of criticism.. I love it! And they think they are the ones trolling us. LOL
No they keep their money via loopholes in the tax code you fucking moron. A tax hikes on the rich will do nothing if the code isn't simplified so that a lawyer can't use legalese to weasel their clients out of trouble. All we can do is vote on the promise to close these loopholes like Bannon has done, and you liberals are.voting against tax hikes for the rich.
Fucking morons the lot of you.
Do you not understand what a priori means? Are you being coy or are you really so ill educated that you can't understand that I don't believe inherently in your views? Tell me, how does a person get into high finance without understanding politics? If you know, why haven't you moved up into that field
>Call in the bots
We don't either you moron, lrn 2 read. It's a bot to keep /pol/ on /pol/
Nigge it puts tax hikes on the wealthy , it isn't about wages. Income tax is only a part of it ffs
You do realize that trump lost the popular vote by over 3,000,000 right?
America is not fed up with the democrats. America loves them.
The issue is that all the smart people tend to gather and all the sister / cow fucking retards spread out all over the place. so when it comes to electoral votes the welfare collecting inbreed hicks carry more weight then the people who make jobs and pay taxes.
So you don't see any of the problems with your posts. Brilliant.
Well for starters, you can't simply conflate finance and politics in that way because the two are only tangentially related. That's one of the reasons Trump was a moronic presidential pick, the other being his record in business.
Its like we are having a contest to elect the worst president ever every single time now.
it just keeps getting worse. and just when you think it cant get any worse it dose.
>finance and politics in that way because the two are only tangentially related.
Again, a prior assumption I don't believe in. A person in high finance can talk about the politics if finance. Get it? This is the politics of passing a budget. Get it?
>America is not fed up with the democrats. America loves them.
You are so out of touch and don't even realize that real working Americans don't even care about the fake "muh Russians" narrative. They are tired of it, they are tired of the SJW marches and vandalism taking place. If you think that real Americans are on your side, you are so mistaken. This is exactly why you guys lost the election. Keep it up, and don't change, and you're guaranteed to lose many more.
>you guys lost the election
hillary actually won you retard, by more than 3 million votes, which is very substantial. also, people are allowed to protest, and they are doing no more harm than your side did with the tea party bullshit.
That is exactly my point. compare a electoral voting map to a population density map. all the red areas are full of corn and cow fucking hicks. the blue areas are population centers where people are capable of critical thinking and when someone says "Were gonna build a wall. its gonna be great. so great. its gonna be more greater thent he great wall of CHINA! AND WERE GONNA MAKE MEXICO PAY FOR IT!!!!!" they call bullshit. but the red ares stop and think "uhhh derp he dun been said da mex-e-cans gunna ben there dun payin fer muh wall! we gots to got for for thise here white man bubba."
Any other GOP candidate would have had 8 million more votes than Hillary.
She lost to a cartoon character after rigging a nomination because she thought pandering to the illegals and welfare leeches would be enough.
The vast bulk of the population want so badly to vote democrat because they agree with them more then republicans.
However the democrats loose the swing votes because of a few key issues.
Most people support having decent gun laws. its just that the left takes it WAY too far.
Most people are ok with it during the first trimester. but most people do not support it after then. the left has a growing number of people that think you should be able to get one done up to the point of birth.
Most people really do want equality for everyone. but a rapid number of the left wnat special treatment for some and to force others into a 2nd class status
There are others. but those are the key ones that if they would just drop like a radioactive rock then the dems would crush republicans. I really dont understand how they cant see this.
I really think that republicans aren't going to impeach him until they push through as much of their agenda as possible. They will use impeachment to save face and try and unify the party under pence. Assuming that Ryan and Mcconnell didn't get too deep with the campaign. Its possible they will be caught up in the public outcry, but its unlikely.
Motherfucker's done though. Even if he was totally innocent, the people in his campaign aren't and this is killing his trust/ratings with americans, as well as the rest of the world. The fact that our president is seen as a joke by the international community is detrimental enough to our nations power.
But yeah, Im am bathing in the liquid schadenfreude of watching this administration choke themselves on half truths and reactionary logic that the drumph snowflakes drink down like holy mana. Get wrecked.
Oh and, to the faggot who keeps spamming these threads with model pics, thanks for confirming that you have no capacity for defense other than plugging your ears and crying like a bitch until the scary discussion goes away. You are the exact definition of a delicate snowflake you worthless fuck.
>However the democrats loose the swing votes because of a few key issues
Namely Russian vote tampering. Early polling, and popular vote point to there being oddities as well as a shit ton of other evidence.
Namely Russian vote tampering. Early polling, and popular vote point to there being oddities as well as a shit ton of other evidence.
Provide the evidence
PROVIDE THE EVIDENCE
NY, LA, and Chicago account for 94% of the US tax revenue. They pay more taxes than the rest of the country, and should therefore have more say in politics and elections.
Don Jrs emails for starters. Then there is a continuous stream of other although circumstantial evidence. Then there are byproducts of the hacking like the vote count oddities described, and the disparagement between the popular vote count and EC being the widest ever in history. You don't even have to be smart to notice that something is wrong here.
Doesn't that mean they're fucking retarded for paying more in taxes while keeping their shitty infrastructure instead of improving it?
Paying higher taxes = more intelligent? Since when?
How many blue pills do you take each morning cuckmeat?
>Don Jrs emails for starters.
Then link them.
>Then there is a continuous stream of other although circumstantial evidence.
>Then there are byproducts of the hacking like the vote count oddities described, and the disparagement between the popular vote count and EC being the widest ever in history.
>ou don't even have to be smart to notice that something is wrong here.
Then it should not be hard for you present all this evidence to this thread, and summarily convert us all over to your cause.
I'll wait here for you to get it.
Cook County is $6B of $14B.
Cook County contains Chicago, but also contains other suburbs. Some of which, like Winnetka, have big $ and are red.
Your fun facts are as usual, fabricated.
Evidence to the contrary?
I don't get this. On the one hand, you liberals accuse the rich of being greedy and corrupt.
On the other hand, when the rich DO pay more in taxes and it's convenient for you, you applaud their financial obesity and demand that you be allowed to exploit poor-er people riding on the coattails on the rich, in the form of un-balanced voting rights.
So I get that there are some butt hurt progressives who still want to get hillary in office some how, but the idea that this is the majority of democratic supporters plan is entirely wrong. At this point the removal of trump has the direct consequence of swearing in president pence. Any other outcome is fantasy. Democrats dont like this, but we know that Pence will not overtly run this country into the ground.
Stop pretending that we have the ghost of Hillary ready to swoop in from stage left to confront tyranny. This isn't hamlet faggot.
Liberals have officially lost their minds and are bordering psychosis. It's scientific.
It's so much fun to watch all of the mental gymnastics as their house of cards crumbles all around them.
The funny thing is that they actually funded this study, who got the results reversed by accident, and the liberals ran with them, then once they were corrected, the libs never retracted their assertions.
Apparently you have never paid income taxes.
>what are tax brackets, and how do they work
Also capital gains taxes are even higher yet.
The fuck out of here with that bullshit...
So Breitbart & Trump were lying when they said Russia hacked the DNC?
Oh, and Don Jr, Manafort, and Kushner weren't attempting to meet a Kremlin connected lawyer with the sole purpose of obtaining information to influence the election?
Speaking of Manafort... or Flynn... or Page... or Stone...
>call people cucks in public/too their face constantly
>liberals believe using the word cuck makes you insta-virgin
>girlfriend finds it hilarious
>:7/10 female friend finds it hilarious and calls others cucks herself
>mfw liberals live in a literal delusional fantasy world
Why dont we tax the upper class like we did 70 or 80 years ago? You know, when america was "great". after all we want to make america great again right? so we should start with the tax policies.
>a Kremlin connected lawyer
Top fucking kek. She was a Russian lawyer but had nothing to do with the Kremlin. Reach much?
Also, how did she get into the country without a visa? Oh fuck, that's right Obama let her in...Woops! I guess he should be investigated for treason too.
It's not incoherent.
You're just calling it incoherent because addressing it directly would call on you to defend your beliefs.
Since you get your beliefs from twitter, Facebook, CNN and your friends, you don't know WHY you believe the things you do. You just believe them to fit in.
That's called small-scale jingoism. Also a cuck, since you can't form your own beliefs.
Yes, flat sales tax, no loopholes, everybody pays when you buy something. Problem solved.
Only the democrats didn't want that, because they like using the IRS as weapon against their political opponents. Obama himself admitted that on camera.
A flat tax with no loopholes and no exceptions is the only way.
>"oh that will hurt the very poor, and those on welfare"
No, you increase the welfare by the same percentage basically washing the tax for the recipients.
>Paying higher taxes = more intelligent? Since when?
Paying more in taxes means you have a higher paying job. which in turn requires college.
Pushing buttons in a factory requires a high school diploma (if that) and therefore pays like shit since a trained monkey can do it.
Thats why blue states pay more in taxes and take less in handouts where as red states overwhelmingly pay less in taxes then they take in handouts.
Think what you want, but I pay more taxes than the average American worker, because I pay capital gains taxes which are at a much higher rate. Many people making more than me, actually pay less in taxes because of how the laws are setup. And I don't mean the uber rich making a ton more than me, I mean people only making 5-10K more per year than me.
>flat sales tax
that's not a fair tax system. we need higher taxes on the rich and corporations while taxing regular people less. are you that redpilled to buy into that bs, which will only benefit the ultra-rich? they're selling you a load of shit, and you're buying into it.
>3 June 2016
>Rob Goldstone to Trump Jr
>Emin [Agalarov, a Russian pop star represented by Goldstone] just called and asked me to contact you with something very interesting.
>The Crown prosecutor of Russia met with his father Aras [a Moscow-based developer who tried to partner with Trump in a hotel project] this morning and in their meeting offered to provide the Trump campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary [Clinton] and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful to your father.
>This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr Trump – helped along by Aras and Emin.
>how do percentages work
The rich people WILL PAY MORE using this system. They buy more of, and more expensive products, which means they will pay more taxes. It's not really that complicated.
You spend $20,000 on a car, and pay $4,000 in taxes on it (at 20%), while a rich guy buys a LearJet at $8,500,000 and pays $1,700,000 in taxes (at the same 20% level).
You paid $4000
He paid $1700000
Taking %40 in taxes on somone who makes $40,000 a year hurts them a hell of a lot more then taking %80 from someone who makes $10,000,000 a year.
Im fine with brackets.
$1-$50,000 = no tax
$50,001 - $100,000 = taxed at %30
$100,001 - $150,000 = %40
150,001 - $250-000 = %50
$250,001 - $300,000 = %90
$300,001 and up =%99
So if you make $150,000 a year you pay nothing in tax on the first $50,000 and then the remaining $100,000 is taxed at %30 meaning you would pay a total of %30 a year in taxes.
The higher tax brackets would encourge the owners to reduce they own pay since it would be next to worthless to make beyond $300,000 a year and would result in higher pay for the people doing the work.
could tweek the numbers around. maybe have the top bracket at $500,000 or something.
They will impeach him and the people will revolt. We are facing Civil war 2.0. Our enemies will use the unrest to try and achieve their immediate goals, which will lead to World War 3.0. The blind liberal hatred of Trump will lead to over a billion people dying
the government needs to set absolute caps, and take any earnings beyond those limits. people and corporations don't need this kind of insane money. this would also encourage corporations to hire more workers instead of pocketing an obscene amount of profits.
Overages from corporations could be redistributed to the people. They obviously would not want too much of that happening, and would hire more workers as a result. A win for everyone.
Why should the people or the government steal someone else's profits? That's what you are describing is legalized theft. Neither the people, nor the government is automatically entitled to just take someone else's profits away simply because they think they earned too much.
The greatest failing of this countries populace is the petty squabble of this liberal vs. conservative. Politics in this country have become a sham too bogged down by our peaking capitalistic society. Corporate money is in the pockets of democrats and republicans. The only difference is that democrats hide it while republicans "own it". Money in politics has fucked the U.S. the fuck up
>really guise he's going to be impeached any day now...
>or.... or... special election guise..... she can still win!
>he's not serious, he will drop out
>he'll never make it past the primaries
>he'll never win the primary
(wins the GOP primary)
>he just handed the election to Hillary
>he can't possibly beat Hillary
>he's doing so bad in the polls - Hillary doesn't even have to try
>he's fucking up the debates so bad - Hillary's got this
>he stands no chance of winning
(he wins the election)
>WTF - the world is ending
>the electoral college doesn't have to pick him
>the electoral college won't pick him
>the electoral college will pick an alternate - it's their right
(gets the EC pick)
>the senate won't accept the ECs pick
>they have a right to reject the pick and choose someone else
>he's not fit to be president, and won't be allowed to be inaugurated
>he's going to be impeached any day now....
>Comey is about to drop the hammer on him.
(Comey testimony actually worse for democrats)
>he's going to resign soon.... he's tired of the job and people beating him up all the time.
(Russia investigation proven to be a hoax by CNN expose')
>a committee is being put together to have him removed under the 25th Amendment of the Constitution. Really he'll be gone any day now...
>vote counts are being investigated in 39 states which could trigger a special election.... Hillary could be president guise!
Why should the people or the government steal someone else's means of production? That's what you are describing is economic slavery. Neither the people, nor the government is automatically entitled to just take someone else's means away simply because they think they produced too much.
Yea I doubt anyone but you trumptards will care. Republicans, conservatives, libertarians, tea partiers.. His approval rating is like 43percent. And if you trumptards want a civi war against us and the liberals and democrats and independents. The rest of the country will smash you
We need a reset. The system is setup to benefit white people who have been the problem all along. The country was founded by whites, based on white values, white religion, and designed to penalize those who aren't that. A civil war would be good for everyone except those who are benefited under the current system.