So... about this HD snuff film........,

>>736920389
Yes

>>736920389
yeah. im gonna need a link.

>>736919820
There isn't an extensive network of child snuff producers that law enforcement is struggling to fight.

>>736920389
Yeahhh... OP?

File: 1254497215536.jpg (9KB, 254x321px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 254x321px

>>736920586
Maybe they should be trying to fight it.

>>736919820
You deserve to be fucking killed you sick piece of shit degenerate.

An hero yourself you degenerate

>>736920586
Why not? Judging from this thread, there's evidently a market for it.

>>736921185
>>736921265
>>736921386
i don't think he actually does it, and the people who do are so rare to the point that it doesn't count

For fucks sake, never mind all this waffle, link to the vid you plebian

you dont know how the law works lol

Proof of this, woodchipper video?

File: 1497670448014.jpg (65KB, 1190x595px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 1190x595px

>>736919820
story behind pic?

>>736920389
>>736920485
>>736920858

We need a link man. Don't be an asshole.

File: 654654234.jpg (42KB, 382x287px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 382x287px

>>736919820
she wasn't part of a snuff film though, her dad killed, her, her brother, and them himself

here is a pic of a dead rape victim. once again, not snuff. it's disrespectful to the victim. But thats about it.

lol at all the ppl who think the vid actually exists

>>736924204
M O D S
O
D
S

File: 1200px-Gadus_morhua_Cod-2b-Atlanterhavsparken-Norway.jpg (151KB, 1200x664px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 1200x664px

>>736924812
C O D S
O
D
S

>>736920389

Don't fail us anon. We're here for the good shit, not a cock tease.

File: bait.png (532KB, 1597x1600px) Image search: [Google]

532KB, 1597x1600px

>>736919820

>>736920389
Op here, it's a hypothetical ffs you retards

>>736920389
Only popped in here for this tbh

>>736925501

OP has failed us yet again. In light of this news: kill yourself

>>736926203
is that really surprising shit may as well have had BAIT written all over it

>>736924204
>/b/
>Mods giving a fuck

>>736926973
>>736924812
why would they delete the picture? there is nothing illegal about it

>>736924204
pussy too hairy to be underage we good

>>736920389
Yes - I would like a link to the snuff film as well.

>>736919820
Where's the snuff film? Link?

>>736919820
Post the link

I wanna see the woodchipper video

Interesting concept OP.

Is it really legal to broadcast dozens of children being forced thru a wood chipper tho?

>>736927100
>They don't get the irony

>>736919820
WTF is this!?

>>736927148
Anon, I'm pretty sure thats blood.

>>736919820
Thats not how you use a tie

Sex bad. Murder okay.

K could someone explain who the actual fuck feeds kids to woodchippers and does anyone other than OP has information about this?

>>736925430
this isnt bait this is a critiscism to society you faggot

>>736928025
H Y P H O T H E T I C A L

>>736928188
hypothetical*

>>736919820
this topic only needs one thread there's just not enough people interested anymore here

>>736927625
Source for this particular photo.
https://www.bizarrepedia.com/haunting-polaroid/https://www.bizarrepedia.com/haunting-polaroid/

>>736919820
Welcome to America where sex is bad and watching someone get their head bashed in with a baseball bat until his eyes pop out is quality television.

>>736928108
deep, man

>>736927625
Sometimes I wonder what the guy did to them. Kept them alive long enough

>>736924204
MOOS!

>>736928406
404

>>736922629
I am also curious

>>736919820

I'm starting to think that this (((legal))) woodchipper video doesn't exist

>>736924204
Lol how do you die from rape? What a fucking pussy. Must be a feminist

>>736924204
rip

File: Philippthesmug.png (213KB, 368x371px) Image search: [Google]

213KB, 368x371px

>>736920389

blame the ameritards

>>736919820
Ask merica. Exactly as you said, it makes no sense. If the same logic were to be followed, one should be jailed for murder for owning, or even just looking at your image. That is because in America, and increasingly all over the world, people are getting ridiculously long sentences for looking at images that harm noone.

Names to google:Morton Berger, Terryl Gene Peters

>>736931527
Point is,in some places you could go out and forcibly rape a little girl and get a lesser sentence than for downloading an image of a nude 12 yo. One such place ia Arizona. Problem is, America is forcing everybody else to follow suit

File: Prison-labor-2.jpg (74KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 640x360px

>>736931527
>people are getting ridiculously long sentences

Please, we prefer to call them discount labor contracts.

>>736919820
any more girls being hanged?

I'm happy to see people start waking up and speaking out against this bullshit that's been going on for the past decade or so.

Looking at images in itself does not hurt anyone and punishing this act with sentences as long as we have seen in the United States only promotes actual harm to children by way of encouraging potential offenders to seek out real children instead of doing so on their computers

>>736929110
dad hanged his 2 girls in his basement

>>736932497
I look at whatever i want to look at. Fuck 4chan and anyone else who dictates what i can and can't look at

>>736932375
bump for this

>>736924204
That teddybear only makes it worse.

>>736919820
>I can own a fully HD snuff film where 200+ children are slowly fed into a woodchipper feet first while screaming for someone, anyone, to save them. I am fully allowed by law to not only masturbate to it, I can fully legally film myself doing that and broadcasting that commercially.
looking forward to your commercial broadcast

>>736932705
And if you are in the wrong country your government can take your life away for doing so. Btw 4chan was famous for being full of actual cp, not naked girls, in its early days

>>736919820

they should both be illegal

/thread

>>736920586
they weren't fighting it under obama. its only under Trump that we see anything happening.

>>736933278
You can't /thread your own post, nigger.

>>736919820
>I can fully legally film myself slowly feed 200+ children into a woodchipper and broadcast that commercially.
no you can't

File: 1497989920036.jpg (99KB, 810x1440px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 810x1440px

>>736932497
>You nigger
Making the CP requires harming the kid in the first place. Either they are being raped, or blackmailed. Either way, to make it harms the child depicted.

File: 1496908607707.png (32KB, 510x518px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 510x518px

If you didn't want to see rape and gore or both done to kids why did you come to /b/

File: GnarlyChildShredder.jpg (39KB, 400x450px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 400x450px

>>736919820

The proper way to put children in a wood chipper is head first.

>>736933585
>>736933585
Maybe if you read what he actually posted instead of being a nigger, you might be able to comprehend what he is saying. He says he can legally own a video of 200+ kids being thrown in a wood chipper, not do it himself.

>>736933585
That's not what he said you fucking retard

>>736933890
You are forgetting that a "child" or minor can be old enough to consent, for example 16, yet if you film that happening you would still be looking at child pornography production charges and see your life destroyed. Again, America dictates, and in every country the age limit for appearance on film is being set at 18, regardless of age of consent that can go as low as 12 in some places.
The only notable exception is the state law of Maryland, according to which 16 is the threshold for both age of consent and child pornography. At least they are consistent there.

The amount of people in this thread who completely miss the point OP was trying to make is insane. It really summer, isn't it?

>>736924995
Wut have u started?
>lol

>>736919820
Dunno where you live but how I understand it, here in the US they allow pictures of children that can be naked as long as it's not sexual in any fashion. Like a nudist family could take a family photo, post it on the internet and not get in trouble for it.

Or at least that was how it used to be a few years ago, maybe they changed that law recently though, I don't really care enough to check if it's the same today as it was back then.

>>736919820
Your interest in this picture doesn't encourage other people to go out and kill kids.

>>736927379
If u put it under the guise as
>journalism

>>736934347
So..if I had porn with a 16 year old in it that was recorded in Maryland, and watched it here in *REDACTED*, I'd get v& by the FBI?

>>736919820
This picture makes me angry

>>736928223
Apothecary
>what are we doing?

>>736934759
Federal law is still the same, so that could still apply, even in md

>where's the woodchipper video

Y'all are so fucking retarded

>>736919820
I'm not 100% positive that what are you saying is correct anon.

>>736919820
what the fuck is wrong with you

>>736935125
Topkek

>>736935210
He's Horny. You never been Horny before? You need some cock

>>736934681
It also depends on whether the owner of the picture or video has it for sexual gratification. A nudist who has family photos including children naked is legal but if someone collects nudist pictures of children purely to fap to, then that can become illegal. A rekt image including a child is not illegal, even if they are undressed , if for historical documentation or even for shock value. But again if it is for someone purely to fap to, it becomes illegal. So, OP'S pic would be legal in a rekt thread or as here to provoke discussion, but would not be legal in a fap thread.

>>736919820
snuff films don't exist.

laws aren't made based around other laws. you cannot have pictures of sexualized children because it's wrong. it's the intent of the picture.

>>736934681
Maybe, but they may as well prosecute you if so they feel. I wouldn't want to risk it since the penalties are so severe. I think many parents feel the same way

>>736931527
The images make people more likely to commit sexual assault.

File: 389.png (29KB, 176x232px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 176x232px

>>736919820
>posts about having HD snuff films
>doesn't post any

I thought you were cool OP.

>>736932497
No, you wanting the pictures creates a demand. Pedos are the problem.

>>736935367
>Necrophilia

>>736933320
Of course you don't really think this, otherwise you'd be an idiot. Nothing is this simple.